Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Breaking Load of Hitches and Ropes Used in Rigging

Brian Kane
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 2012, 38 (1) 1-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2012.001
Brian Kane
Brian Kane, MA Arborists Association Professor, Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Clove (top) and cow hitches including the half hitch and stopper knot that was needed to prevent the tag end of the rope pulling through during the test.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Timber hitch (top) and running bowline; in the former, a loop (crossing parts of rope) was formed around the standing part of the rope; in the latter, a bight (parallel parts of rope) was formed around the standing part of the rope.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Rope tied in a running bowline under the pre-load of 0.889 kN. The black line on the utility pole normal to the rope indicates the location where the hitch was tied (30 cm from the end of the pole). The white arrow indicates the point of failure for all ropes and hitches.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Ropes used in testing, including their construction, manufacturer, material, nominal diameter (mm), rated breaking load (kN), and linear density (kg/100 m). The latter four values were obtained from manufacturers’ literature.

    RopeBraidManufacturerMaterialDiameterBreaking loadDensity
    ArborPlexSingleSamsonPolyester/polyolefin12.726.6910.1
    Double EsterlonDoubleYalePolyester12.748.0412.1
    Double EsterlonDoubleYalePolyester15.975.5714.3
    Industrial Poly DBDoubleNew EnglandPolyester12.744.0410.4
    Safety Pro-12SingleNew EnglandPolyester/polyolefin12.729.3611.6
    Stable BraidDoubleSamsonPolyester12.746.2612.2
    True-BlueSingleSamsonPolyester12.732.4713.1
    XTC-12SingleYalePolyester/polyolefin12.726.6910.0
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Least squares means (standard error) for breaking load (PMAX in kN) and specific strength [kN/(kg/100 m)] classified by knot and rope.

    EffectLevelnPMAXzSpecific strengthz
    RopeArborPlex2021.58 (0.49)a2.13 (0.04)a
    Double Esterlon2738.16 (0.43)f3.16 (0.04)c
    Industrial Poly DB1231.06 (0.64)d2.98 (0.05)bc
    Safety Pro-121725.64 (0.49)b2.29 (0.04)a
    Stable Braid2235.49 (0.55)e2.90 (0.05)b
    True-Blue2027.89 (0.48)c2.12 (0.04)a
    XTC-122022.87 (0.49)a2.29 (0.04)a
    HitchClove hitch3728.85 (0.38)a2.55 (0.03)ab
    Cow hitch3428.98 (0.39)a2.55 (0.03)ab
    Running bowline3529.72 (0.39)a2.62 (0.03)a
    Timber hitch3228.27 (0.40)a2.49 (0.03)b
    • ↵zRead down a column within each effect, least squares means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05) by Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Least squares means (standard error) for breaking load (PMAX in kN) and specific strength [kN/(kg/100 m)] of Double Esterlon ropes 15.9 mm in diameter and 12.7 mm in diameter.

    EffectLevelnPMAXzSpecific strengthz
    Diameter12.7 mm1538.67 (0.85)a3.20 (0.07)a
    15.9 mm960.82 (1.06)b3.03 (0.08)a
    HitchClove hitch1348.75 (0.97)a3.05 (0.08)a
    Running bowline1150.73 (0.96)a3.18 (0.08)a
    • ↵zRead down a column within each effect, least squares means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05) by Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 38 (1)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breaking Load of Hitches and Ropes Used in Rigging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Breaking Load of Hitches and Ropes Used in Rigging
Brian Kane
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2012, 38 (1) 1-5; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2012.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Breaking Load of Hitches and Ropes Used in Rigging
Brian Kane
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2012, 38 (1) 1-5; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2012.001
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS AND MATERIALS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Breaking Load
  • Hitch
  • Rigging
  • Rope
  • Specific Strength

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire