Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

A 100% Tree Inventory Using i-Tree Eco Protocol: A Case Study at Auburn University, Alabama, U.S.

Nicholas A. Martin, Arthur H. Chappelka, Gary J. Keever and Edward F. Loewenstein
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 2011, 37 (5) 207-212; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2011.027
Nicholas A. Martin
Nicholas A. Martin (corresponding author), School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Arthur H. Chappelka
Arthur H. Chappelka, Professor, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary J. Keever
Gary J. Keever, Professor, Department of Horticulture, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward F. Loewenstein
Edward F. Loewenstein, Associate Professor, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. CTLA
    . 2000. Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers. Guide for Plant Appraisal (8th Edition). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
  2. ↵
    1. CITYgreen
    . 2010. American Forests: CITYgreen Environmental Education: Tree Inventory Worksheet. <http://www.americanforests.org/downloads/citygreen/Tree%20Inventory%20Collction%20Sheet.pdf>
  3. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.F.,
    2. E.G. McPherson,
    3. H.W. Schroeder, and
    4. R.A. Rowntree
    . 1992. Assessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18:227–234.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.F.,
    2. H.W. Schroeder, and
    3. P.H. Gobster
    . 1991. The Significance of Urban Trees and Forests: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Values. Journal of Arboriculture 17:276–284.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Escobedo, F.,
    2. J.A. Seitz, and
    3. W. Zipper
    . 2009a. Gainesville’s Urban Forest Canopy Cover. FOR 215. School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FR215>
  6. ↵
    1. Escobedo, F.,
    2. J.A. Seitz, and
    3. W. Zipper
    . 2009b. Gainesville’s Urban Forest Structure and Composition. FOR 214. School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FR214>
  7. ↵
    1. Hauer, R.J.,
    2. R.W. Miller, and
    3. D.M. Ouimet
    . 1994. Street Tree Decline and Construction Damage. Journal of Arboriculture 20:94–97.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Huyler, A.,
    2. A.H. Chappelka, and
    3. E.F. Loewenstein
    . 2010. UFORE Model Analysis of the Structure and Function of the Urban Forest in Auburn, Alabama. pp. 18–23. In: Emerging Issues Along Urban-Rural Interfaces III: Linking Science and Society Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA. April 11–14, 2010.
  9. ↵
    1. ISA
    . 2010. International Society of Arboriculture History. <http://www.isa.arbor.com/about/History/1950.aspx>
  10. ↵
    1. i-Tree
    . 2010a. i-Tree: Tools for assessing and managing community forests. <http://www.itreetools.org>
  11. ↵
    1. i-Tree
    . 2010b. Frequently Asked Questions about the UFORE model. <http://www.itreetools.org/eco/resources/UFORE%20Model%20FAQs.pdf>
  12. ↵
    1. i-Tree
    . 2010c. i-Tree Software Suite v3.1 User’s Manual. <http://www.itreetools.org/resources/manuals/iTree%20Eco%20Users%20Manual.pdf>
  13. ↵
    1. i-Tree
    . 2010d. UFORE Methods. <http://www.itreetools.org/eco/resources/UFORE%20Model%20FAQs.pdf>
  14. ↵
    1. Matheny, N., and
    2. J. Clark
    . 2009. Tree Risk Assessment: What We Know (and What We Don’t Know). Arborist News 18:28–33.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. D. Nowak,
    3. G. Heisler,
    4. S. Grimmond,
    5. C. Souch,
    6. R. Grant, and
    7. R. Rowntree
    . 1997. Quantifying Urban Forest Structure, Function, and Value: The Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems 1:49–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. D.E. Crane
    . 1998. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: Quantifying Urban Forest Structure and Functions. Integrated Tools Proceedings. pp. 714–720.
  17. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. M.H. Noble,
    3. S.M. Sisinni, and
    4. J.F. Dwyer
    . 2001. People & Trees: Assessing the US Urban Forest Resource. Journal of Forestry 99:37–42.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane, and
    3. J.F. Dwyer
    . 2002. Compensatory Value of Urban Trees in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture 28: 194–199.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane,
    3. J.C. Stevens,
    4. R.E. Hoehn,
    5. J.T. Walton, and
    6. J. Bond
    . 2008a. A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:347–358.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. J.T. Walton,
    3. J.C. Stevens,
    4. D.E. Crane, and
    5. R.E. Hoehn
    . 2008b. Effect of Plot and Sample Size on Timing and Precision of Urban Forest Assessments. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34: 386–390.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Pandit, R., and
    2. D.N. Laband
    . 2010. A Hedonic Analysis of the Impact of Tree Shade on Summertime Residential Energy Consumption. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:73–80.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Webster, B.L.
    1978. Guide to Judging the Condition of a Shade Tree. Journal of Arboriculture 4:247–249.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Welch, J.M.
    1994. Street and Park Trees of Boston: A Comparison of Urban Forest Structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 29:131–143.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 37 (5)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 37, Issue 5
September 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A 100% Tree Inventory Using i-Tree Eco Protocol: A Case Study at Auburn University, Alabama, U.S.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
A 100% Tree Inventory Using i-Tree Eco Protocol: A Case Study at Auburn University, Alabama, U.S.
Nicholas A. Martin, Arthur H. Chappelka, Gary J. Keever, Edward F. Loewenstein
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2011, 37 (5) 207-212; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2011.027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A 100% Tree Inventory Using i-Tree Eco Protocol: A Case Study at Auburn University, Alabama, U.S.
Nicholas A. Martin, Arthur H. Chappelka, Gary J. Keever, Edward F. Loewenstein
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2011, 37 (5) 207-212; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2011.027
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • i-Tree Eco
  • Tree inventory
  • UFORE Model
  • Urban Forest Sampling, Urban Forestry

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire