Community Ash Densities and Economic Impact Potential of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) in Four Midwestern States

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Anonymous

   . 2009. Cooperative EAB Program. Accessed 08/28/2009. <http://www.emeraldashborer.info>
2. ↵
   1. Burns, R.M., and
   2. B.H. Honkala

   , technical coordinators. 1990. Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. vol. 2, 877 pp.
3. ↵
   1. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA)

   . 2000. Guide for Plant Appraisal, ninth edition. Champaign, IL. 143 pp.
4. ↵
   1. D’Amato, N.E.,
   2. T.D. Sydnor, and
   3. D. Struve

   . 2002. Urban foresters identify Ohio’s tree needs. Journal of Arboriculture 28:291–301.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. M.R. Wagner,
   2. K.M. Clancy,
   3. F. Lieutier, and
   4. T.D. Paine

   1. Herms, D.A.

   2002. Strategies for deployment of insect resistant ornamental plants, pp. 217–237. In: M.R. Wagner, K.M. Clancy, F. Lieutier, and T.D. Paine (Eds.). Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 332 pp.
6. ↵
   1. Herms, D.A,
   2. D.G. McCullough, and
   3. D.R. Smitley

   . 2004. Under attack: the current status of the emerald ash borer infestation and the program to eradicate it. American Nurseryman. 200(7):20–27.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. K. Gottschalk

   1. Herms, D.A.,
   2. D. Smitley,
   3. P. Bonello, and
   4. D. McCullough

   . 2005. Evaluation of resistance of Asian and North American ashes to emerald ash borer, p. 43. In: K. Gottschalk (Ed.). Proceedings, XV USDA Interagency Research Forum on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species 2004. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-332. 98 pp.
8. ↵
   1. Kovacs, K.F.,
   2. R.G. Haight,
   3. D.G. McCullough,
   4. R.J. Mercader,
   5. N.W. Siegert, and
   6. A.M. Liebhold

   . 2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009–2019. Ecological Economics 69:569–578.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Landers, J.

   2005. Emerald ash borer and controversy spreads in and around Michigan. Tree Care Industry 26(2):66–70.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Malhotra, N.K.

    1996. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 890 pp.
11. ↵
    1. Schaar, C.

    2008. Personal communication. Urban Forester, City of Toledo, Ohio.
12. ↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D.,
    2. M. Bumgardner, and
    3. A. Todd

    . 2007a. The potential economic impacts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) on Ohio, U.S., communities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33(1):48–54.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D.,
    2. R.F. Gooding, and
    3. B.L. Bishop

    . 2007b. Guide to Plant Appraisal of Trees and other Plants in Ohio, seventh edition. Ohio Chapter, International Society of Arboriculture, Columbus, OH. 40 pp.
14. ↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D., and
    2. S.K. Subburayalu

    . 2009. Results of a survey of twenty-two Ohio urban foresters. City Trees 45(2):32–37.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2000. Accessed 09/28/2009. <http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html>
16. ↵
    1. USDA Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS)

    . 2003. Emerald Ash Borer; Quarantine and Regulations. Federal Register 66(198); 59082-91.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. USDA Forest Service

    . Forest Inventory and Analysis Mapmaker 4.0. [Database]. Accessed 09/08/2009. <http://fia.fs.fed.us/tools-data/other/default.asp>