Tree Wound Responses Following Systemic Insecticide Trunk Injection Treatments in Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.) as Determined by Destructive Autopsy

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Abacus Concepts

   . 1991. SuperAnova Berkeley (CA): Abacus Concepts.
2. ↵
   1. Abacus Concepts

   . 1992. StatView Berkeley (CA): Abacus Concepts.
3. ↵
   1. Cappaert, D.,
   2. D.G. McCullough,
   3. T.M. Poland, and
   4. N.W. Seigert

   . 2005. Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. American Entomologist 51:152–165.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Chaney, W.R.

   1986. Anatomy and Physiology Related to Chemical Movement in Trees. Journal of Arboriculture 12(4):85–91.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Dujesiefken, D.,
   2. W. Liese,
   3. W. Shortle, and
   4. R. Minocha

   . 2005. Response of beech and oaks to wounds made at different times of the year. European Journal of Forest Research 124:113–117.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Ellmore, G.S.,
   2. W.E. Phair,
   3. C. Gill, and
   4. D. Skinner

   . 1988. Fluid Delivery in Injected Ring-porous Trees. Journal of Arboriculture 14(10):233–239.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Esau, Katherine

   . 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons. New York. Santa Barbara. London, Sydney. Toronto. 550 pp.
8. ↵
   1. Haack, R.A.,
   2. E. Jendek,
   3. H. Liu,
   4. K.R. Marchant,
   5. T.R. Petrice,
   6. T.M. Poland, and
   7. H. Ye

   . 2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter Michigan Entomology Society 47:1–5.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Herms, D.A.,
   2. D.G. McCullough,
   3. D.R. Smitley,
   4. C.S. Sadoff,
   5. R.C. Williamson,
   6. P.L. Nixon

   . 2009. Insecticide Options for Protecting Ash Trees from Emerald Ash Borer. North Central IPM Bulletin 12 pp.
10. ↵
    1. McCullough, D.G.,
    2. A. Agius,
    3. D. Cappaert,
    4. T. Poland,
    5. D. Miller, and
    6. L. Bauer

    . 2003. Host Range and Host Preference of Emerald Ash Borer. Report. Department of Entomology and Department of Forestry, Michigan State University. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
11. ↵
    1. McFarlane, D.W., and
    2. S.P. Meyer

    . 2003. Characteristics and distribution of potential ash hosts for Emerald Ash Borer. Department of Forestry, Michigan State University.
12. ↵
    1. Salisbury F.B., and
    2. R.V. Parke

    . 1970. Vascular Plants: Form and Function. Second Edition. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. Belmont CA. 252 pp.
13. ↵
    1. Sanchez-Zamora, M.A., and
    2. R. Fernandez-Escobar

    . 2004. Uptake and distribution of trunk injections in conifers. Journal of Arboriculture 30:73–79.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L., and
    2. H.G. Marx

    . 1977. Compartmentalization of decay in trees. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Agricultural Information Bulletin 405. 73 pp.
15. 1. Shigo, A.L.,
    2. W.E. Money, and
    3. D. Dodds

    . 1977. Some internal effects of Mauget tree injections. Journal of Arboriculture 3:213–220.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.

    1984. Compartmentalization: a conceptual framework for understanding how trees grow and defend themselves. Annual Review of Phytopathology 22:189–214.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.

    1991. Modern Arboriculture. Shigo and Trees, Associates. Durham, NH. 423 pp.
18. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.

    1999. A New Tree Biology: Facts, Photos and Philosophies on Trees and Their Problems and Proper Care. Shigo and Trees, Associates. Durham, NH. 618 pp.
19. ↵
    1. Smith, K.T.

    1988. Wounding, compartmentalization, and treatment tradeoffs. Journal of Arboriculture 14:226–229.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Smith, K.T.

    2006. Compartmentalization Today. Arboricultural Journal, AB Academic Publishers. Great Britain. 29:173–184.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Smith, K.T., and
    2. P.A. Lewis

    . 2005. Potential concerns for tree wound response from stem injection in: ONKENB,. and Reardon R. (Compilers), Proceedings of the Third Hemlock Wooly Adelgid Conference, Asheville, North Carolina, February 1–3, 2005. USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET 2005-01, pp. 173–178.
22. ↵
    1. Smitley, D.,
    2. T. Davis, and
    3. E. Rebek

    . 2008. Progression of ash canopy thinning and dieback outward from the initial infestation of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Southeast Michigan. Journal of Economic Entomology 101:1643–1650.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 1. Smitley, D.R.,
    2. J.J. Doccola, and
    3. D.L. Cox

    . 2011. Multiple-year protection of ash trees from emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), with a single trunk injection of emamectin benzoate. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37: in press.
24. ↵
    1. Tattar, T.A., and
    2. S.J. Tattar

    . 1999. Evidence of the Downward Movement of Materials injected into Trees. Journal of Arboriculture 25(6):325–332.

    OpenUrl