Wood Residue Processing and Utilization in Southeastern Michigan, U.S.

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Alderman, D.R.,
   2. R.L. Smith, and
   3. V.S. Reddy

   . 1999. Assessing the availability of wood residues and residue markets in Virginia. Forest Products Journal 49(4):47–55.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Alderman, D.R., and
   2. R.L. Smith

   . 2000. Solid wood received and marketed by Virginia’s landfill facilities. Forest Products Journal 50(6):39–44.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bratkovich, S.M.

   2001. Utilizing municipal trees: Ideas from across the country. NA-TP-06-01, St. Paul, MNI: USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry. 50 pp.
4. ↵
   1. Chow, P., and
   2. L. Zhao

   . 1992. Medium density fiberboard made from phenolic resin and wood residues of mixed species. Forest Products Journal 42(10):65–67.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. De Hoop, C.F.,
   2. S. Kleit,
   3. S.J. Chang,
   4. R. Gazo, and
   5. M.E. Buchart

   . 1994. Survey and mapping of wood residues users and producers in Louisiana. Forest Products Journal 47(3):31–37.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Forest Products Laboratory

   . 2002. Successful approaches to recycling urban wood wastes. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-133, Madison, WI: USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 20 pp.
7. ↵
   1. Grushecky, S.T.,
   2. D.W. McGill, and
   3. R.B. Anderson

   . 2006. Inventory of wood residues in southern West Virginia. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 23(1):47–52.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Haviarova E.,
   2. C. Eckelman, and
   3. Y. Erdil

   . 2001. Design and testing of wood school desk frames suitable for production by low technology methods from waste wood residues. Forest Products Journal 51(5):79–88.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Hubing, N.R.

   1993. Wisconsin wood residue study. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Madison, Wisconsin. 25 pp.
10. ↵
    1. McCullough, D.G., and
    2. N.W. Siegert

    . 2007. Estimating potential emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) populations using ash inventory data. Forest Entomology 100(5):1577–1586.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. McKeever, D.B.

    1998. Wood residual quantities in the United States. Biocycle 39(1):65–68.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. McKeever, D.B.

    2003. Quantifying the flow: Taking inventory of woody residuals. Biocycle 44(7):311–35.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Murphy, J.A.,
    2. P.M. Smith, and
    3. J. Wiedenbeck

    . 2007. Wood residue utilization in Pennsylvania 1988 vs. 2003. Forest Products Journal 57(4):101–106.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Nzokou, P.,
    2. T. Petrice,
    3. R.A. Haack, and
    4. D.P. Kamdem

    2006. Treatment of Emerald Ash Borer Infested Logs from Southeastern Michigan. Forest Product Journal 56(5):78–81.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Petersen, C.E.,
    2. E.O. Berg, and
    3. L. Ronnegard

    . 2005. Quality control of waste to incineration – Waste composition analysis in Lidkoping, Sweden. Waste Management & Research 2005(23):527–533.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Sherrill, S.B.

    2003. Harvesting Urban Timber: A guide to making better use of urban trees. Linden Publishing Inc., Fresno, CA. 200 pp.
17. ↵
    1. Sherrill, S.B., and
    2. D. MacFarlane

    . 2007. Measures of Wood Resources in Lower Michigan: Wood Residues and the Saw Timber Content of Urban Forests. Technical Report. Southeast Michigan Resource Conservation and Development Council and the U.S.D.A. Forest Service. 178 pp.
18. ↵
    1. Short, P.H., and
    2. T.R. Hooper

    . 1996. Production and utilization of industrial wood and bark residues in Mississippi. Food & Fiber Center, Cooperative Extension Service. Mississippi State University. Mississippi State, MS. 45 pp.