Effect of Tree Size, Root Pruning, and Production Method on Root Growth and Lateral Stability of Quercus virginiana

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Anonymous

   . 2004. American standard for nursery stock. American National Standards Institute (ANSI Z60.1). American Association of Nurserymen. Washington, D.C.
2. ↵
   1. Blanusa, T.,
   2. E. Papadogiannakis,
   3. R. Tanner, and
   4. R.W.F. Cameron

   . 2007. Root pruning as a means to encourage root growth in two ornamental shrubs, Buddleja davidii ‘Summer Beauty’ and Cistus ‘Snow Fire’. Journal Horticultural Sciences and biotechnology 82:521–528.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Burdett, A.N.

   1978. Control of root morphologenesis for improved mechanical stability in container-grown lodgepole pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 8:483–486.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Coutts, M.P.

   1983. Development of the structural root system of Sitka spruce. Forestry 56:1–16.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Coutts, M.P.

   1986. Components of tree stability in Sitka spruce on peaty gley soil. Forestry 59:173–197.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Coutts, M.P.,
   2. C.C.N. Nielson, and
   3. B.C. Nicoll

   . 1999. The development of symmetry, rigidity, and anchorage in the structural root system of conifers. Plant and Soil 217:1–15.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Crook, M.J., and
   2. A.R. Ennos

   . 1998. The increase in anchorage with tree size of the tropical tap-rooted tree Mallotus wrayi, King (Euphorbiaceae). Annals of Botany 82:291–296.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Danjon F.,
   2. T. Fourcaud, and
   3. D. Bert

   . 2005. Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytology 168:387–400.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Dunn, G.M.,
   2. J.R. Huth, and
   3. M.J. Lewty

   . 1997. Coating nursery containers with copper carbonate improves root morphology of five native Australian tree species used in agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 37:143–155.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Duryea, M.L.,
    2. E. Kampf, and
    3. R.C. Littell

    . 2007. Hurricanes and the urban forest: I. Effects on southeastern United States coastal plain species. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:83–97.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. M.P. Coutts and
    2. J. Grace

    1. Ennos, A.R.

    1995. Development of buttress in rainforest trees: the influence of mechanical stress. In: M.P. Coutts and J. Grace (Eds.). Wind and trees. Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge. pp. 293–301.
12. ↵
    1. Fourcaud, T.,
    2. J. Ji,
    3. Z. Zhang, and
    4. A. Stokes

    . 2007. Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: A modeling approach. Annals of Botany 100:1093.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Fraser, A.I., and
    2. J.B.H. Gardiner

    . 1967. Rooting and stability in Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Bulletin 40, HMS, London.
14. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. I.A. Leone, and
    3. F.B. Flower

    . 1987. Effect of soil compaction and oxygen content on vertical and horizontal roots distribution. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 5:33–36.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. M.E. Kane

    . 1991. Growth dynamics following planting of cultivars of Juniperus chinensis. Journal American Society Horticulture Science 116:637–641.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. T.H. Yeager, and
    3. D. Weigle

    . 1996. Fertilizer, irrigation and root ball slicing affects Burford holly growth after planting. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 14:105–110.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. C. Harchick

    . 2008. Planting depth in containers affects root form and tree quality. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 26:129–134.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. C. Harchick, and
    3. C. Wiese

    . 2008. Pruning roots affects tree quality in container-grown oaks. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 27:7–11.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick

    . 2010a. Root ball shaving improves root systems on seven species in containers. Journal Environmental Horticulture 28:13–18.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. C. Harchick, and
    3. M. Paz

    . 2010b. Effect of tree size, root pruning and production method on establishment of Quercus virginiana. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:183–190.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. C. Harchick, and
    3. M. Paz

    . 2010c. Effect of container type on root form of red maple. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 28:1–7.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Halter, M.R.,
    2. C.P. Chanway, and
    3. G.J. Harper

    . 1993. Growth reduction and root deformation of containerized lodgepole pine saplings 11 years after planting. Forest Ecological Management 56:131–146.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Harrington, T.B., and
    2. K.D. Howell

    . 1998. Planting cost, survival and growth one to three years after establishing loblolly pine seedlings with straight, deformed, or pruned taproots. New Forests 15:193–204.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Harris, J.R., and
    2. E.F. Gilman

    . 1993. Production method affects growth and post-transplant establishment of ‘East Palatka’ holly. Journal American Society Horticulture Science 118:194–200.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Hayfa, K.,
    2. A. Stokes,
    3. F. Danjon,
    4. K. Gouskou, and
    5. F. Lagane

    . 2007. Is it possible to manipulate root anchorage in young trees? Plant Soil 294:87–102.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Krasowski, M.J., and
    2. J.N. Owens

    . 2000. Morphological and physical attributes of root systems and seedlings growth in three different Picea glauca reforestation stock. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:1669–1681.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Lindstrom, A., and
    2. G. Rune

    . 1999. Root deformation in plantations on container-grown Scots pine trees: effects on root growth, tree stability and stem straightness. Plant and Soil 217:29–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Lyford, W.H., and
    2. B.F. Wilson

    . 1964. Development of the root system of Acer rubrum L. Harvard Forest Paper 10. Harvard University, Petersham, MA. 17 p.
29. ↵
    1. Marshall, M.D., and
    2. E.F. Gilman

    . 1998. Production methods and irrigation affect root morphology of live oak. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 15:84–87.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Mickovski, S.B., and
    2. R. Ennos

    . 2002. A morphological and mechanical study of the root systems of suppressed crown Scots pine Pinus sylvestris. Trees 16:274–280.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Mickovski, S.B., and
    2. R. Ennos

    . 2003. Anchorage and asymmetry in the root system of Pinus peuce. Silva Fennica 37:161–173.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Nichols, T.J., and
    2. A.A. Alm

    . 1983. Root development of container-reared, nursery-growth, and naturally regenerated pine seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13:239–245.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. C. Almqvist

    1. Nielson, C.N.

    1998. Root development of bare rooted seedlings after field establishment and consequences for wind stability. In: C. Almqvist (Ed.). Root development and stability. Conf. held at Garpenberg, Sweden, 30 Sept-1 Oct 1997. The Forest Research Institution of Sweden Report No. 7. pp. 66–71.
34. ↵
    1. Ortega, U.,
    2. J. Majada,
    3. A. Mena-Petite,
    4. J. Sanchez-Zabala,
    5. N. Rodriguez-Itturrizar,
    6. K. Txarterina,
    7. J. Azpitarte, and
    8. M. Duñabeitia

    . 2006. Field performance of Pinus radiata D. Don produced in nursery with different types of containers. New Forests 31:97–112.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Robert, J.A., and
    2. B.S. Lindgren

    . 2006. Relationships between root form and growth, stability, and mortality in planted versus naturally regenerated lodgepole pine in north-central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:2642–2653.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. S.J. Colombo

    1. South, D.B., and
    2. R.G. Mitchell

    . 2005. A root-bound index for container-grown Pines. In: S.J. Colombo (Ed.). The Thin Green Line: A symposium on the state-of-the-art in reforestation. Forest Research Information Paper No. 160. Ontario Forest Research Institute. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. pp. 88–93.
37. ↵
    1. Sundstrom, E., and
    2. M. Keane

    . 1999. Root architecture, early development and basal sweep in containerized and bare-root Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Plant and Soil 217:65–78.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Stokes, A.

    1999. Strain distribution during anchorage failure of Pinus pinaster Ait. at different ages and tree growth response to wind-induced root movement. Plant and Soil 217:17–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. M.P. Coutts and
    2. J. Grace

    1. Stokes A.,
    2. A.H. Fitter, and
    3. M.P. Coutts

    . 1995. Response of young trees to wind: effects on root growth. In: M.P. Coutts and J. Grace (Eds.). Wind and Trees. pp. 264–275. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
40. ↵
    1. Stout, B.B.

    1956. Studies of the root systems of deciduous trees. Black Forest Bulletin 15. Cornwall-on-the-Hudson, NY: Harvard University 45 p.
41. ↵
    1. Tanaka, N., and
    2. J. Yagisawa

    . 2009. Effects of tree characteristics and substrate condition on critical breaking moment of trees due to heavy flooding. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 5:59–70.

    OpenUrl