Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1.
Troy, Michigan: emerald ash borer larval density in green ash street trees and canopy thinning ratings of the same trees for 1.5 years after trunk injection of emamectin benzoate at rates of 0.10–0.60 g ai/2.54 cm dbh. Data are means ± SD. Each treatment has 10 replications unless indicated otherwise under mean ± SD as (n).
Treatment Treatment Dates 2005 dbh (cm) 2005 Canopy thinning (%) 2005 Larvae per m2 2006 Canopy thinning (%) Emamectin 0.10 g/2.54 cm dbh 5-25-05 + 5-23-06 30.0 ± 3.6 16.5 ± 13.4 A 0 ± 0 A 16.7 ± 8.8 Emamectin 0.20 g/2.54 cm dbh 5-25-05 30.0 ± 3.6 25.0 ± 11.1 AB 0 ± 0 A 26.7 ± 25.0 Emamectin 0.40 g/2.54 cm dbh 5-25-05 30.5 ± 5.8 30.8 ± 22.1 AB 0 ± 0 A 28.2 ± 27.9 Emamectin 0.48 g/2.54 cm dbh 5-25-05 26.4 ± 6.4 26.8 ± 13.2 AB 0 ± 0 A 21.0 ± 14.5 Emamectin 0.60 g/2.54 cm dbh 5-25-05 30.4 ± 6.5 41.5 ± 26.0 B 0 ± 0 A 34.3 ± 40.2 (9) Control - 29.6 ± 4.8 19.0 ± 14.7 A 59.2 ± 72.0 B 54.3 ± 33.9 (9) Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05, by the Tukey-Kramer test.
- Table 2.
East Lansing, Michigan: emerald ash borer larval density in green ash street trees and canopy thinning ratings of the same trees for one to three years after a single trunk injection of emamectin benzoate at a rate of 0.4 g ai/inch dbh on September 27, 2005, or at 0.2 or 0.1 ai/2.54 cm dbh on May 21, 2007. Data are means ± SD. Each treatment has 10 replications unless indicated otherwise under the mean ± SD by (n).
Treatment Treatment Dates 2006 dbh (cm) 2006 canopy Thinning (%) 2007 canopy thinning 2007 Larvae per m2 2008 canopy Thinning (%) 2008 larvae per m2 2009 canopy thinning (%) Emamectin trunk injection 0.4 g ai/inch dbh Sept. 2005 29.9 ± 11.4 7.3 ± 8.9 12.8 ± 14.8 0 ± 0 A 19.3 ± 17.9A 0 ± 0 A 13.8 ± 14 A Emamectin trunk injection 0.2 g ai/inch dbh May 2007 29.2 ± 4.1 11.8 ± 1.6 17.3 ± 13.5 (9) 0 ± 0 A (9) 12.8 ± 8.8 A (9) 0 ± 0 A (9) 13.1 ± 13.3 A (9) Emamectin trunk injection 0.1 g ai/inch dbh May 2007 38.2 ± 7.3 17.0 ± 10.5 11.4 ± 15.9 0 ± 0 A 29.8 ± 29.4 A 0 ± 0 A (6) 10.4 ± 9.1 A (7) Control - 28.7 ± 10.6 16.0 ± 21.0 28.5 ± 27.9 6.9 ± 9.4 B 51.3 ± 30.2 B 28.7 ± 21.5 B 58.1 ± 33.2 B - Table 3.
Adrian, Michigan: emerald ash borer larval density in green ash street trees and canopy thinning ratings of the same trees for 3-4 years after a single trunk injection of emamectin benzoate on June 22, 2006. Data are means ± SD. Each treatment has 10 replications unless shown under the mean ± SD as (n).
Treatment Treatment dates 2008 dbh (cm) 2006 canopy thinning (%) 2007 canopy thinning (%) 2007 larvae per m2 2008 canopy thinning (%) 2008 larvae per m2 2009 canopy thinning (%) Emamectin trunk injection 0.4 g ai/inch dbh June 2006 45.0 ± 8.1 Az 14.4 ± 3.1 A 11.1 ± 6.0 A - 12.3 ± 10.4 A - 7.2 ± 6.7 A Emamectin trunk injection 0.4 g ai/inch dbh June 2006 43.1 ± 12.2A 16.0 ± 5.0 A 11.6 ± 6.5 A 2.4 ± 7.1 A 13.0 ± 12.7 A (9) 0 ± 0 A (9) 20.0 ± 8.0 A Imidacloprid trunk injection + soil imidacloprid June 2007 + June 2007, 2008 38.4 ± 9.8 A 14.9 ± 3.6 A 12.0 ± 4.9 A - 13.5 ± 12.0 A - 23.9 ± 10.1 A Soil imidacloprid June 2006, 2007, 2008 39.6 ± 15.0 A 14.2 ± 5.7 A 8.4 ± 4.0 A 3.6 ± 6.8 A 33.0 ± 25.8 AB 5.7 ± 5.6 AB (4) 30.3 ± 22.0 A Control 1 - 43.4 ± 16.9 A - 12.0 ± 15.1 A - 58.3 ± 26.5 BC 23.6 ± 39.4 B (8) 89.5 ± 13.4 B Control 2 - 44.7 ± 11.2 A 15.6 ± 5.4 A 10.3 ± 7.0 A 6.2 ± 6.6 A 64.0 ± 29.3 C 27.7 ± 28.9 B (7) 84.6 ± 12.0 B ↵zMeans followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05, by the Tukey-Kramer test.