The Research Foundation to Tree Pruning: A Review of the Literature

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Harris, R.,
   2. J. Clark and
   3. N. Matheny

   . 2004. Arboriculture—Integrated management of landscape trees shrubs and vines. 4th edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River NJ.
2. ↵
   1. Kane, B., and
   2. R. Harris

   . 2008. Does pruning reduce the risk of tree failure? Arborist News 17:46-48.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Shigo, A.

   1989. Tree Pruning—A worldwide photo guide. Shigo and Trees Associates. Durham NH.
4. ↵
   1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)

   . 2008. ANSI A300 Pruning Standard. American National Standards Institute.
5. ↵
   1. Appel, D.

   1994. Identification and control of oak wilt in Texas urban forests. Journal of Arboriculture 20:250–258.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Austad, I., and
   2. L. Hauge

   . 2007. Pollarding in western Norway. In: Proc., European Symp. Tronges (pollards). Vendome Agricultural College. Loir-et-Cher. France.
7. 1. Bai, S.,
   2. W. Chaney, and
   3. Y. Qi

   . 2005. Wound closure in trees affected by paclobutrazol. Journal of Arboriculture 31: 273–279.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Baker, F. and
   2. D. French

   . 1985. Economic effectiveness of operational therapeutic pruning for control of Dutch elm disease. Journal of Arboriculture 11:247–249.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Balandier, P.

   1997. A method to evaluate needs and efficiency of formative pruning of fast-growing broad-leaved trees and results of an annual pruning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27:809–816.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Balder, H.,
    2. K. Ehlebracht, and
    3. E. Mahler

    . 1997. Straßenbaume. Planen, Pflanzen, Pflegen, am Beispiel Berlins. Berlin, Germany: Patzer-Verlag.
11. ↵
    1. Ball, J.

    1992. Response of the bronze birch borer to pruning wounds on paper birch. Journal of Arboriculture 18:294–297.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Barger, J., and
    2. W. Cannon

    . 1987. Response of smaller European bark beetles to pruning wounds on American elm. Journal of Arboriculture 13:102–104.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Barry, K.,
    2. M. Hall, and
    3. C. Mohammed

    . 2005. The effect of time and site on incidence and spread of pruning-related decay in plantation-grown Eucalyptus nitens. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35:495–502.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Barry, K.,
    2. R. Pearce, and
    3. C. Mohammed

    . 2000. Properties of reaction zones associated with decay from pruning wounds in plantation-grown Eucalyptus nitens. Forest Pathology 30:233–245.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Barton, I.

    1995. Preliminary results from a sailing pruning trial of Cupressus species. New Zealand Tree Grower 16:28–29.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Bauch, J.,
    2. A. Shigo, and
    3. M. Stark

    . 1980. Wound effects in the xylem of Acer and Betula species. Holzforschung 34: 154–160.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Baum, S., and
    2. F. Schwarze

    . 2002. Large-leaved lime (Tilia platyphyllos) has a low ability to compartmentalize decay fungi via reaction zone formation. New Phytologist 154: 481–490.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Proc

    1. Bory, G.,
    2. G. Hebert,
    3. N. Macle, and
    4. D. Clair-Maczulajtys

    . 1996. Physiological consequences of architectural pruning on trees. In: Proc. 2nd European Congress in Arboriculture. Institut pour le Développement Forestier, 111–119. Paris, France.
19. 1. Brickell, C., and
    2. D. Joyce

    . 1996. The Royal Horticultural Society Pruning and Training. Dorling Kindersley.
20. 1. Bridgeman, P.

    1976. Tree Surgery. London: David & Charles.
21. ↵
    1. British Standards Institute

    . 1989. BS 3998 Recommendations for tree work. British Standards Institute. London. United Kingdom.
22. ↵
    1. Broschat, T., and
    2. A. Meerow

    . 2000. Ornamental Palm Horticulture. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.
23. 1. Brown, G.

    2004. The Pruning of Trees, Shrubs and Conifers. 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
24. ↵
    1. Browning, M., and
    2. H. Wiant

    . 1997. The economic impacts of deferring electrical utility tree maintenance. Journal of Arboriculture 23:106–112.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Buhler, O., and
    2. P. Kristoffersen

    . 2009. The Urban Tree Arboretum in Horsholm Denmark: A new tool towards an improved education of arborists and tree managers. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8:55–61.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Butin, H., and
    2. A. Shigo

    . 1981. Radial shakes and “frost cracks” in living oak trees. Research Paper. NE-478. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
27. ↵
    1. Camilli, K.,
    2. D. Appel, and
    3. W. Watson

    . 2007. Studies on pruning cuts and wound dressings for oak wilt control. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33, no. 2:132–130.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Campanella, B.,
    2. A. Toussaint, and
    3. R. Paul

    . 2009. Mid-term economical consequences of roadside tree topping. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8:49–53.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Chandler, W., and
    2. R. Cornell

    . 1952. Pruning Ornamental Trees, Shrubs and Vines. California Agricultural Extension Service Circular No. 179. Oakland CA.
30. 1. Chandrashekara, U.

    2007. Effects of pruning on radial growth and biomass increment of trees growing in homegardens of Kerala, India. Agroforest Systems 69:231–237.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Churack, P.,
    2. R. Miller,
    3. K. Ottman, and
    4. C. Koval

    . 1994. Relationship between street tree diameter growth and projected pruning and waste wood management costs. Journal of Arboriculture 20:231–236.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Clair-Maczulajtys, D.,
    2. I. Le Disquet, and
    3. G. Bory

    . 1999. Pruning stress: Changes in the tree physiology and their effects on the tree health. In: Proc. International Symposium on Urban Tree Health, 317–324. Acta Horticulturae 496.
33. 1. Clark, F.B.

    1955. Black walnut responds to pruning. Journal of Forestry, 53:362–365.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Close, D.,
    2. J. Groninger,
    3. J. Mangun, and
    4. P. Roth

    . 2001. Homeowners opinions on the practice and effects of topping trees. Journal of Arboriculture 27:160–165.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Coder, K.D.,
    2. P. Blackburne-Maze,
    3. M. Cracknell, and
    4. R. Bentley

    . 1997. Crown pruning effects on roots. In: Proc. 3rd European Arboriculture Congress.
36. 1. Coombs, D.,
    2. P. Blackburne-Maze,
    3. M. Cracknell, and
    4. R. Bentley

    . 2001. The Complete Book of Pruning. Cassell Paperbacks. England.
37. 1. Croxton, P.,
    2. W. Franssen,
    3. D. Myhill, and
    4. T. Sparks

    . 2004. The restoration of neglected hedges: A comparison of management treatments. Biological Conservation 117:19–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Dahle, G.,
    2. H. Holt,
    3. W. Chaney,
    4. T. Whalen,
    5. D. Cassens,
    6. R. Gazo, and
    7. R. McKenzie

    . 2006a. Branch strength loss implications for silver maple (Acer saccharinum) converted from round-over to V-trim. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32, no. 4:148–154.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Dahle, G.,
    2. H. Holt,
    3. W. Chaney,
    4. T. Whalen,
    5. J. Grabosky,
    6. D. Cassens,
    7. R. Gazo,
    8. R. McKenzie, and
    9. J. Santini

    . 2006b. Decay patterns in silver maple (Acer saccharinum) trees converted from round-over to V-trims. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32:260–264.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Deflorio, G.,
    2. K. Barry,
    3. C. Johnson, and
    4. C. Mohammed

    . 2007. The influence of wound location on decay extent in plantation-grown Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens. Forest Ecology Management 242:353–362.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Doughty, S.,
    2. C. Hollier,
    3. K. Koonce, and
    4. P. Orr

    . 1989. How wound compounds affect pruning wound closure and decay in young swamp red maple trees. HortScience 24:393.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Drenou, C.

    1999. La taille des arbres d’ornement (The size of ornamental trees: how to why). Paris, France: Institut pour le developpement forestier.
43. ↵
    1. Drenour, C.

    2000. Pruning trees: the problem of forks. Journal of Arboriculture 26:264–269.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Dujesiefken, D.

    1991. Der Kronenschnitt in der Baumpflege (Crown cutting in arboriculture). Neue Landschaft 36: 27–31.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Dujesiefken, D.

    (Ed.) 1995. Wundbehandlung an Bäumen (Wound treatment of trees). Bernhard Thalacker Berlag, Braunschweig.
46. ↵
    1. Dujesiefken, D.,
    2. C. Drenou,
    3. P. Oven, and
    4. H. Stobbe

    . 2005a. Arboricultural practices. In: Urban Forests and Trees, 520. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
47. 1. Dujesiefken, D.,
    2. S. Ebenritter, and
    3. W. Liese

    . 1989. Wundreaktionen im Holzgewebe bei Birke, Buche und Linde (Wound reactions in the wood of birch, beech and basswood). Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff (Germany) 47:495–500.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Dujesiefken, D.,
    2. T. Kowol, and
    3. W. Liese

    . 1998. Vergleich der Schnittführung bei der Astung von Linde und Roßkastanie (Comparison of the situation of cuts during pruning of linden or horse chestnut). Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift (Germany, F.R.) 43:331–332, 336.

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Dujesiefken, D.,
    2. W. Liese,
    3. W. Shortle, and
    4. R. Minocha

    . 2005b. Response of beech and oaks to wounds made at different times of the year. European Journal of Forest Research 124:113–117.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Dujesiefken, D.,
    2. A. Rhaesa,
    3. D. Eckstein, and
    4. H. Stobbe

    . 1999. Tree wound reactions of differently treated boreholes. Journal of Arboriculture 25:113–123.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Dujesiefken, D., and
    2. H. Stobbe

    . 2002. The Hamburg Tree Pruning System - A framework for pruning of individual trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 1:75–82.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Dujesiefken, D.,
    2. Horst Stobbe, and
    3. D. Eckstein

    . 1998. Langzeitwirkungen von Astungen im Holz von Linde und Roßkastanie (Long-term effects of pruning on the trunk of lime and horsechestnut). Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt - Tharandter Forstliches Jahrbuch 117:305–315.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Duryea, M.,
    2. G. Blakeslee,
    3. W. Hubbard, and
    4. R.A. Vasquez

    . 1996. Wind and trees: A survey of homeowners after Hurricane Andrew. Journal of Arboriculture 22 1:44–49.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Ehsen, H.

    1987. Pruning of street trees: Cause, objective and execution. Arboricultural Journal 11:245–263.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Eisner, N.J.,
    2. E.F. Gilman, and
    3. J.C. Grabosky

    . 2002a. Branch morphology impacts compartmentalization of pruning wounds. Journal of Arboriculture 28:99–105.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Eisner, N.J.,
    2. E.F. Gilman,
    3. J.C. Grabosky, and
    4. R.C. Beeson, Jr.

    2002b. Branch junction characteristics affect hydraulic segmentation in red maple. Journal of Arboriculture 28:99–105

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Ericsson, A.,
    2. C. Hellqvist,
    3. B. Langstrom,
    4. S. Larsson, and
    5. O. Tenow

    . 1985. Effects on growth of simulated and induced shoot pruning by Tomicus piniperda as related to carbohydrate and nitrogen dynamics in Scots pine. Journal of Applied Ecology 22:105–124.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. European Arboricultural Council

    . 2008. European Tree Pruning Guide. Bad Honnef/Germany.
59. 1. Evans, P., and
    2. J. Klett

    . 1984. The effects of dormant pruning treatments on leaf, shoot, and root production from bare-root Malus sargentii. Journal of Arboriculture 10:298–302.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Evans, P., and
    2. J. Klett

    . 1985. The effects of dormant branch thinning on total leaf, shoot, and root production from bareroot Prunus cerasifera ‘Newportii’. Journal of Arboriculture 11:149–51.

    OpenUrl
61. 1. Fay, N.

    2002. Environmental arboriculture, tree ecology and veteran tree management. Arboricultural Journal 26: 213–238.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Fay, N.

    2004. Survey methods and development of innovative arboricultural techniques in key UK (United Kingdom) veteran tree sites. In: The trees of history: Protection and exploitation of monumental trees. Proc. International Congress 64–75. Torino, Italy.
63. 1. Fazio, J., and
    2. E. Krumpe

    . 1999. Underlying beliefs and attitudes about topping trees. Journal of Arboriculture 25:193–199.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Ferrari, F.,
    2. A. Pestalozza, and
    3. R. Casagrandi

    . 2003. Pruning carefully. Acer 3:41–47.

    OpenUrl
65. 1. Ferrari, F.

    2004. Summer pruning. Acer 3:53–55.

    OpenUrl
66. 1. Ferrini, F.

    2004a. Training veteran trees. Part 1. Acer 4:42–46.

    OpenUrl
67. 1. Ferrini, F.

    2004b. Training veteran trees. Part 2. Acer 5:50–54.

    OpenUrl
68. 1. Ferrini, F.

    2004c. Management of monumental trees: Review on the effects on physiological balance and tree biomechanics. In: The trees of history: Protection and exploitation of monumental trees. Proc. International Congress 56–63. Torino, Italy: Regione Piemonte Univ. di Torino.
69. 1. Ferrini, F.

    2006a. Potatura degli alberi ornamentali: Effetti sull’equilibrio fisiologico e biomeccanico (Pruning ornamental trees: Effects on physiology and biomechanic equilibrium). Sherwood-Foreste 120:19–22.

    OpenUrl
70. 1. Ferrini, F.

    2006b. Interventi di potatura e loro effetti sull’equilibrio fisiologico e biomeccanico degli alberti ornamentali. Sherwood 3:19–22.

    OpenUrl
71. ↵
    1. Ferrini, F.

    2006c. Pollarding and its effects on tree physiology: a look to mature and senescent tree management in Italy. In: Colloque européen sur les trognes, 1–8. Vendôme France.
72. 1. Findlay, C.,
    2. F. Last,
    3. P. Aspinall,
    4. C. Ward Thompson, and
    5. N. Rudd

    . 1997. Root and shoot pruning in root-balled Acer platanoides L.: effects of establishment and shoot architecture. Arboricultural Journal 21:215–229.

    OpenUrl
73. 1. Forkasiewicz, K.

    1998. The design and implementation of a code of practice for low voltage overhead utility pruning of trees. Arboricultural Journal 21:121–128.

    OpenUrl
74. ↵
    1. Fraedrich, B., and
    2. E.T. Smiley

    . 1996. Maintenance pruning standard: A simplified view. Arborist News 5:49–52

    OpenUrl
75. 1. Funk, D.

    1979. Stem form response to repeated pruning of young black walnut trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 9:114–116.

    OpenUrl
76. ↵
    1. K.G. Sellner

    1. Galvin, M.F.

    2005. Trees and their impact on electric reliability during and following tropical storm Isabel. In: Hurricane Isabel in Perspective. K.G. Sellner (Ed.). Edgewater, MD: Chesapeake Research Consortium, CRC Publication.
77. 1. Gatti, L.

    2003. Precise cutting. Acer 3:42–43.

    OpenUrl
78. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. J. Grabosky,
    3. S. Jones, and
    4. C. Harchick

    . 2008a. Effects of pruning dose and type on trunk movement in tropical wind storms. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:13–19.

    OpenUrl
79. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.

    2002. Illustrated Guide to Pruning. 2nd ed. CEN-GAGE Delmar Learning, January 15.
80. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.

    2003. Branch-to-stem diameter ratio affects strength of attachment. Journal of Arboriculture 29:291–294.

    OpenUrl
81. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. J. Grabosky

    . 2006. Branch union morphology affects decay following pruning. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32:74–79.

    OpenUrl
82. 1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. G. Knox

    . 2005. Pruning type affects decay and structure of crapemyrtle. Journal of Arboriculture 31:38–47.

    OpenUrl
83. 1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. S. Lilly

    . 2002. Best Management Practices Tree Pruning. International Society of Arboriculture. Champaign, IL.
84. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. F. Masters, and
    3. J. Grabosky

    . 2008b. Pruning affects tree movement in hurricane force winds. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:20–28.

    OpenUrl
85. ↵
    1. Goodfellow, J.,
    2. B. Blumreich, and
    3. G. Nowacki

    . 1987. Tree growth response to line clearance pruning. Journal of Arboriculture 13:196–200.

    OpenUrl
86. ↵
    1. Grabosky, J., and
    2. E.F. Gilman

    . 2007. Response of two oak species to reduction pruning cuts. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:360–366.

    OpenUrl
87. 1. Grabosky, J.,
    2. E.F. Gilman, and
    3. C. Harchick

    . 2007. Use of branch cross-sectional area for predicting pruning dose in young field-grown Quercus virginiana ‘Cathedral’ in Florida, US. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6:159–167.

    OpenUrl
88. 1. Green, D.,
    2. W. Shortle, and
    3. A. Shigo

    . 1981. Compartmentalization of discolored and decayed wood in red maple branch stubs. Forest Science 27:519–522.

    OpenUrl
89. ↵
    1. Gregory, G., and
    2. J. Allison

    . 1979. The comparative effectiveness of pruning versus pruning plus injection of trunk and/or limb for therapy for Dutch elm disease in American elms. Journal of Arboriculture 5:1–4.

    OpenUrl
90. ↵
    1. Guggenmoos, S.

    2007. Increased risk of electrical service interruption associated with tree branches overhanging conductors. Utility Arborist Assoc. Quart. 15:8–14.

    OpenUrl
91. 1. Guimond, C.,
    2. G. Lang, and
    3. P. Andrews

    . 1998. Timing and severity of summer pruning affects flower initiation and shoot regrowth in sweet cherry. HortScience 33:647–649.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
92. 1. Halliwell, B.,
    2. J. Turpin, and
    3. J. Wright

    . 1979. The Complete Handbook of Pruning. 2nd ed. London: Ward Lock.
93. ↵
    1. Hanley, D.,
    2. C. Oliver,
    3. D.A. Maguire,
    4. D. Briggs, and
    5. R. Fight

    (Eds.). 1995. Forest pruning and wood quality of western North American conifers. University of Washington Institute of Forest Research #77. Seattle WA.
94. 1. Harris, R.

    1975. Pruning fundamentals. Journal of Arboriculture 1:221–226.

    OpenUrl
95. 1. Harris, R.

    1994. Clarifying certain pruning terminology: thinning, heading, pollarding. Journal of Arboriculture 20:50–54.

    OpenUrl
96. 1. Hensley, D.

    1979. Pruning: Why, when and how. Journal of Arboriculture 5:239–240.

    OpenUrl
97. ↵
    1. Herring, H.G.,
    2. V.J. Rudolph, and
    3. W.A. Lemmien

    . 1958. Wound area as influenced by closeness of pruning. Journal of Forestry 56:219–220.

    OpenUrl
98. 1. Himelick, E., and
    2. D. Ceplecha

    . 1976. Dutch elm disease eradication by pruning. Journal of Arboriculture 2:81–84.

    OpenUrl
99. ↵
    1. Holewinski, D.,
    2. J. Orr, and
    3. J. Gillon

    . 1983. Development of improved tree trimming equipment and technique. Journal of Arboriculture 9:137–40.

    OpenUrl
100. ↵
     1. Hoster, R.

     1993. Baumpflege und Baumschutz (Tree Care and Tree Protection). Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag Eugen Ulmer.
101. 1. Hudler, G., and
     2. S. Jensen-Tracy

     . 1999. Lac Balsam^® as a treatment to hasten wound closure and minimize discoloration and decay. Journal of Arboriculture 28:264–269.

     OpenUrl
102. 1. Johnson, D.

     2007. Pruning. In Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast. New York, NY: Springer.
103. ↵
     1. Johnstone, R.

     1983. Management techniques for utility tree maintenance. Journal of Arboriculture 9:17–20.

     OpenUrl
104. ↵
     1. Johnstone, R.

     1988. Economics of utility lateral trimming. Journal of Arboriculture 14:74–77.

     OpenUrl
105. ↵
     1. Kane, B.

     2007. Branch strength of Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana var. Bradford). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:283–291.

     OpenUrl
106. 1. Kane, B.

     2008. Tree failure following a windstorm in Brewster Massachusetts USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7:15–23.

     OpenUrl
107. 1. Kane, B., and
     2. R. Farrell

     . 2008. Failure mode and prediction of the strength of branch attachments. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:308–316.

     OpenUrl
108. 1. Kappel, F.,
     2. M. Bouthillier, and
     3. R. Brownlee

     . 1997. Summer pruning young ‘Sweetheart’ sweet cherry trees affects yield and tree size. HortScience 32:1034–1036.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
109. 1. Karlovich, D.,
     2. J. Groninger, and
     3. D. Close

     . 2000. Tree condition associated with topping in southern Illinois communities. Journal of Arboriculture 26:87–91.

     OpenUrl
110. ↵
     1. Kempter, G.

     2004. Best Management Practices Utility Pruning of Trees. International Society of Arboriculture. Champaign, IL.
111. 1. Kerr, G., and
     2. R. Harmer

     . 2001. Production of epicormic shoots on oak (Quercus robur): effects of frequency and time of pruning. Forestry 74:467–477.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
112. 1. Kerr, G., and
     2. G. Morgan

     . 2006. Does formative pruning improve the form of broadleaved trees? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:132–141.

     OpenUrl
113. 1. Kimball, B.,
     2. D. Nolte,
     3. D. Griffin,
     4. S. Dutton, and
     5. S. Ferguson

     . 1998. Impacts of live canopy pruning on the chemical constituents of Douglas-fir vascular tissues: Implications for black bear tree selection. Forest Ecology Management 109:51–56.

     OpenUrl
114. 1. Kramer, E., and
     2. M. Borkowski

     . 2004. Wood grain patterns at branch junctions: modeling and implications. Trees-Structure & Function 18:493–500.

     OpenUrl
115. ↵
     1. Kuhns, M., and
     2. D. Reiter

     . 2007. Knowledge and attitudes about utility pruning and how education can help. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:264–274.

     OpenUrl
116. 1. Langstrom, B., and
     2. C. Hellqvist

     . 1991. Effects of different pruning regimes on growth and sapwood area of Scots pine. Forest Ecology Management 44 2-4:239–254.

     OpenUrl
117. 1. Langstrom, B.,
     2. H. Solheim,
     3. C. Hellqvist, and
     4. R. Gref

     . 1993. Effects of pruning young Scots pines on host vigour and susceptibility to Leptographium wingfieldii and Ophiostoma minus, two blue-stain fungi associated with Tomicus piniperda. European Journal of Forest Pathology 23:400–415.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
118. 1. Ledin, R.

     1961. Pruning Palms. American Horticulture Magazine 40:142–143.

     OpenUrl
119. ↵
     1. Leiser, A.,
     2. R. Harris,
     3. P.L. Neel,
     4. D. Long,
     5. N. Stice, and
     6. R. Maire

     . 1972. Staking and pruning influence trunk development of young trees. Journal of American Society Horticultural Science 97:498–503.

     OpenUrl
120. 1. Lev-Yadun, S., and
     2. R. Aloni

     . 1990. Vascular differentiation in branch junctions of trees: circular patterns and functional significance. Trees- Structure & Function 4:49–54.

     OpenUrl
121. 1. Li, M.,
     2. P. Uehre, and
     3. J. Matschke

     . 2001. Diameter growth and stem form development of young trees, depending on pruning activity. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwese 152:389–393.

     OpenUrl
122. 1. S.P. Raychaudhuri

     1. K. Maramorosch

     1. Liese, W., and
     2. D. Dujesiefken

     . 1996. Wound reactions in trees. In: Forest trees and palms. Diseases and control. S.P. Raychaudhuri (Ed.) and K. Maramorosch, 21–35. New Delhi, Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
123. 1. Liese, W.,
     2. D. Dujesiefken, and
     3. J. Bremer

     . 1988. Wundreaktionen bei Linde nach Astung in der Baumpflege (Wound reactions of lime trees following pruning during tree care). Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt (Germany) 107:184–196.

     OpenUrl
124. 1. Lippi, P.

     1994a. Tree pruning: aims and types. Part 1. Acer 2:18–19.

     OpenUrl
125. 1. Lippi, P.

     1994b. Tree pruning: aims and types. Part 2. Acer 3:19–21.

     OpenUrl
126. ↵
     1. di Lobis, V., and
     2. M. Tomasi

     . 2003. La classificazione degli interventi di manutenzione degli alberi (System of classification for tree care). Sherwood-Foreste 94:39–45.

     OpenUrl
127. 1. Lonsdale, D.

     1993. A comparison of “target”pruning, versus flush cuts and stub pruning. AAIS Arboriculture Research Note 116/93/PATH.
128. ↵
     1. Lonsdale, D.

     2008. BS 3998 Recommendations for tree work: likely implications of the next edition. Arboricultural Journal 31:19–31.

     OpenUrl
129. ↵
     1. Luley, C.,
     2. S. Sisinni, and
     3. A. Pleninger

     . 2002. The effect of pruning on service requests, branch failures, and priority maintenance in the City of Rochester New York U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 28:137–143.

     OpenUrl
130. 1. Malins, J.

     1997. The Pruner’s Handbook. Practical pruning advice for healthy, beautiful plants. 2nd ed. Devon, United Kingdom: David & Charles.
131. 1. Margolis, H.,
     2. R. Gagnon,
     3. D. Pothier, and
     4. M. Pineau

     . 1988. The adjustment of growth, sapwood area, heartwood area, and sapwood saturated permeability of balsam fir after different intensities of pruning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:723–727.

     OpenUrl
132. ↵
     1. Mascelli, M.,
     2. F. Menchi, and
     3. A. Gabellini

     . 2008. Alberature mature in ambiente urbano: Un case nella citta di Prato (Urban plant stand: A study in Prato Italy). Sherwood-Foreste 142:37–41.

     OpenUrl
133. 1. Mayer-Wegelin, H.

     1936. Astung. Hanover, Germany: M. & H. Schaper.
134. 1. Mayer-Wegelin, H.

     1952. Das Aufasten der Waldbaume (Pruning forest trees). 3rd ed. Hannover, Germany: Schaper-Verlag.
135. 1. McGillivary, L.,
     2. S. Wiest, and
     3. D. Hensley

     . 1996. A survey of line clearance operations in Kansas US. Journal of Arboriculture 22:281–282.

     OpenUrl
136. ↵
     1. McQuilkin, W.E.

     1950. Effects of some growth regulators and dressings on the healing of tree wounds. Journal of Forestry 48:423–28.

     OpenUrl
137. 1. Mercer, P.,
     2. S. Kirk,
     3. P. Gendle, and
     4. D.R. Clifford

     . 1983. Chemical treatments for control of decay in pruning wounds. Annals Applied Biology 102:435–453.

     OpenUrl
138. 1. Mercer, P.C., and
     2. S. Kirk

     . 1984a. Biological treatments for the control of decay in tree wounds: Laboratory tests. Annals Applied Biology 104:211–219.

     OpenUrl
139. 1. Mercer, P.C., and
     2. S. Kirk

     . 1984b. Biological treatments for the control of decay in tree wounds: Field tests. Annals Applied Biology 104:221–229.

     OpenUrl
140. 1. Miller, R., and
     2. W. Sylvester

     . 1981. An economic evaluation of the pruning cycle. Journal of Arboriculture 7:109–112.

     OpenUrl
141. 1. Miller, V.

     1959. Crotch influence on strength and breaking point of apple tree branches. Proc. American Society Horticultural Science 73:27–32.

     OpenUrl
142. ↵
     1. Millet, J., and
     2. A. Bouchard

     . 2003. Architecture of silver maple and its response to pruning near the power distribution network. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:726–739.

     OpenUrl
143. 1. Monnier, R.

     2003. A new pruning method for living branches with a thin collar. Forst und Holz 58:661–664.

     OpenUrl
144. 1. de Montigny, L., and
     2. S. Stearns-Smith

     . 2001. Pruning density and severity in coastal western hemlock: 4-year results. Ministry of Forests Research Program. British Columbia. Canada.
145. ↵
     1. Moore, J., and
     2. D. Maquire

     . 2005. Natural sway frequencies and damping ratios of trees: influence of crown structure. Trees - Structure and Function 19:363–373.

     OpenUrl
146. 1. Moorman, G., and
     2. R. Lease

     . 1999. Effects of pruning in the management of dogwood and pine branch dieback in the landscape. Journal of Arboriculture 25:274–277.

     OpenUrl
147. ↵
     1. Neely, D.

     1970. Healing of wounds on trees. Journal of American Society Horticultural Science 95:536–40.

     OpenUrl
148. ↵
     1. Neely, D.

     1979. Tree wounds and wound closure. Journal of Arboriculture 5:135–40.

     OpenUrl
149. 1. Neely, D.

     1988a. Closure of branch pruning wounds with conventional and ‘Shigo’ cuts. Journal of Arboriculture 14: 261–64.

     OpenUrl
150. 1. Neely, D.

     1988b. Wound closure rates on trees. Journal of Arboriculture 14:250–54.

     OpenUrl
151. 1. Neely, D.

     1988c. Tree wound closure. Journal of Arboriculture 14:148–52.

     OpenUrl
152. ↵
     1. Neilsen, W., and
     2. E. Pinkard

     . 2003. Effects of green pruning on growth of Pinus radiata. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:2067–2073.

     OpenUrl
153. ↵
     1. Nowak, D.

     1990. Street tree pruning and removal needs. Journal of Arboriculture 16:309–315.

     OpenUrl
154. ↵
     1. O’Hara, K.

     1991. A biological justification for pruning in coastal Douglas-fir stands. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 6:59–63.

     OpenUrl
155. ↵
     1. O’Hara, K.

     2007. Pruning wounds and occlusion: A long-standing conundrum in forestry. Journal of Forestry 105:131–138.

     OpenUrl
156. ↵
     1. Oleksak, B.,
     2. M. Kmetz-Gonzales, and
     3. D. Struve

     . 1997. Terminal bud cluster pruning promotes apical control in transplanted shade tree whips. Journal of Arboriculture 23:147–154.

     OpenUrl
157. 1. Opgenorth, D.,
     2. L. Butler, and
     3. M. Arciero

     . 1983. Transmission of Ceratocystis ulmi on pruning saws. Journal of Arboriculture 9:196–197.

     OpenUrl
158. ↵
     1. Pavlis, M.,
     2. B. Kane,
     3. J.R. Harris, and
     4. J.R. Seiler

     . 2008. The effect of pruning on drag-induced bending moment of shade trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:207–215.

     OpenUrl
159. ↵
     1. Pearce, R.

     2000. Decay development and its restriction in trees. Journal of Arboriculture 26:1–11.

     OpenUrl
160. 1. Perry, E., and
     2. G. Hickman

     . 1987. Wound closure in eucalyptus. Journal of Arboriculture 13:201–202.

     OpenUrl
161. 1. Peterson, J., and
     2. D. Helmer

     . 1992. A wound treatment system to suppress cankers and wood rots in trees. Journal of Arboriculture 18:155–160.

     OpenUrl
162. ↵
     1. Pfisterer, J.

     1999. Geholzschnitt nach den Gesetzen der Natur (Tree pruning according to the laws of nature). Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag Eugen Ulmer.
163. 1. Pietilä, J.

     1989. Factors affecting the healing-over of pruned Scots pine knots. Silva Fennica 23:125–158.

     OpenUrl
164. 1. Pinkard, E.A.

     2002. Effects of pattern and severity of pruning on growth and branch development of pre-canopy closure Eucalyptus nitens. Forest Ecology Management 157: 217–230.

     OpenUrl
165. 1. Pinkard, E.A.,
     2. M. Battaglia,
     3. C.L. Beadle, and
     4. P.J. Sands

     . 1999. Modeling the effect of physiological responses to green pruning on net biomass production of Eucalyptus nitens. Tree Physiology 19:1–12.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
166. 1. Pinkard, E.A., and
     2. C.L. Beadle

     . 1998. Effects of green pruning on growth and stem shape of Eucalyptus nitens. New Forests 15:107–126.

     OpenUrl
167. 1. Reich, P.,
     2. M. Walters,
     3. S. Krause,
     4. D. Venderklein,
     5. K. Raffs, and
     6. T. Tabone

     . 1993. Growth, nutrition and gas exchange of Pinus resinosa following artificial defoliation. Trees—Structure and Function 7:67–77.

     OpenUrl
168. 1. Schatz, U.,
     2. K. Kannisto, and
     3. M. Rantatalo

     . 2008. Influence of saw and secateur pruing on stem discolouration, wound cicatrisation and diameter growth of Betula pendula. Silva Fennica 42:295–305.

     OpenUrl
169. 1. Schnelle, M., and
     2. J. Klett

     . 1992. Effects of pruning and bark ringing on total nonstructural carbohydrates in crabapple. Journal of Arboriculture 18:192–196.

     OpenUrl
170. 1. Schubert, M.,
     2. S. Fink, and
     3. F. Schwarze

     . 2008a. In vitro screening of an antagonistic Trichoderma strain against wood decay fungi. Arboricultural Journal 31:227–248.

     OpenUrl
171. 1. Schubert, M.,
     2. S. Fink, and
     3. F. Schwarze

     . 2008b. Field experiments to evaluate the application of Trichoderma strain (T-15603.1) for biological control of wood decay fungi. Arboricultural Journal 31:249–268.

     OpenUrl
172. ↵
     1. Schwarze, F.

     2001. Development and prognosis of decay in the sapwood of living trees. Arboricultural Journal 25:321–337.

     OpenUrl
173. ↵
     1. Schwarze, F.,
     2. J. Gruner,
     3. J. Schubert, and
     4. S. Fink

     . 2007. Defence reactions and fungal colonisation in Fraxinus excelsior and Tilia platyphyllos after stem wounding. Arboricultural Journal 30:61–82.

     OpenUrl
174. 1. Schwarze, F., and
     2. C. Heuser

     . 2006. Stem wounds - potential entry courts for wood decay fungi? Arboricultural Journal 29:101–119.

     OpenUrl
175. 1. Shigo, A.

     1981. To Paint or Not to Paint. In: Handbook of Pruning, 20–23. Plants & Gardens. 37(2): Brooklyn Botanic Garden.
176. 1. Shigo, A.

     1983. Targets for proper tree care. Journal of Arboriculture 9:285–94.

     OpenUrl
177. ↵
     1. Shigo, A.

     1984. Compartmentalization: a conceptual framework for understanding how trees grow and defend themselves. Annual Review Phytopathology 22:189–214.

     OpenUrl
178. ↵
     1. Shigo, A.

     1985. How tree branches are attached to trunks. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:1391–1401.

     OpenUrl
179. 1. Shigo, A.

     1989. Tree Pruning: A Worldwide Photo Guide. Shigo and Trees, Associates. Durham NH.
180. 1. Shigo, A.

     1990. Pruning Trees near Electric Utility Lines. Durham, NH: Shigo and Trees, Associates. Durham NH.
181. ↵
     1. Shigo, A., and
     2. E. Larson

     . 1969. Photo guide to the patterns of discoloration and decay in living northern hardwood trees. Research Paper. USDA Forest Service.
182. ↵
     1. Shigo, A., and
     2. H. Marx

     . 1977. Compartmentalization of decay in trees. Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 405. USDA Forest Service.
183. ↵
     1. Shigo, A.,
     2. E. McGinnes,
     3. D. Funk, and
     4. N. Rogers

     . 1979. Internal defects associated with pruned and non-pruned branch stubs in black walnut. Research Paper. No 440. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
184. 1. Shigo, A., and
     2. C. Wilson

     . 1977. Wound dressings on red maple and American elm: Effectiveness after five years. Journal of Arboriculture 3:81–87.

     OpenUrl
185. 1. Shortle, W.

     1979. Mechanisms of compartmentalization of decay in living trees. Phytopathology 69:1147–1151.

     OpenUrl
186. ↵
     1. Slabaugh, P.

     1957. Effects of live crown removal on the growth of red pine. Journal of Forestry 55:904–906.

     OpenUrl
187. 1. Smiley, E.T.

     2003. Does included bark reduce the strength of codominant stems? Journal of Arboriculture 29:104–106.

     OpenUrl
188. 1. Smiley, E.T.,
     2. C. Greco, and
     3. J. Williams

     . 2000. Brace rods for codominant stems: installation location and breaking strength. Journal of Arboriculture 26:170–176.

     OpenUrl
189. ↵
     1. Smiley, E.T., and
     2. B. Kane

     . 2006. The effects of pruning type on wind loading of Acer rubrum. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32:33–40.

     OpenUrl
190. ↵
     1. Smith, D.,
     2. B. Larson,
     3. M. Kelty, and
     4. P. Ashton

     . 1996. The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology 9th ed. New York: Wiley.
191. 1. Smith, K.

     2006. Compartmentalization today. Arboricultural Journal 29:173–184.

     OpenUrl
192. ↵
     1. Stefulesco, C.

     1995. Traditional pruning in France. In: 2nd European Arboricultural Congress. Versailles France.
193. ↵
     1. D. Dujesiefken

     1. P. Kockerbeck

     1. Stobbe, H.,
     2. U. Schmitt,
     3. D. Eckstein, and
     4. D. Dujesiefken

     . 2002a. Behandlungsmöglichkeiten von frischen Anfahrschäden an Alleebäumen (Possible treatment of fresh wounds on street trees). In: Jahrbuch der Baumpflege (Yearbook of tree care). D. Dujesiefken (Ed.) and P. Kockerbeck, 43–55. Thalacker Medien, Braunschwieg.
194. ↵
     1. Stobbe, H.,
     2. U. Schmitt,
     3. D. Eckstein, and
     4. D. Dujesiefken

     . 2002b. Developmental stages of fine structure of surface callus formed after debarking of living lime trees. Annals Botany 89:773–782.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
195. ↵
     1. Svihra, P.

     1994. Principles of eradicative pruning. Journal of Arboriculture 20:262–71.

     OpenUrl
196. ↵
     1. Toussaint, A.,
     2. V. Kervyn de Meerendre,
     3. B. Delcroix, and
     4. J. Baudoin

     . 2002. Analysis of physiological and economical impacts of the roadside trees pruning. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society, and Environment 6:99–107.

     OpenUrl
197. ↵
     1. von Aufsess, H.

     1975. The formation of a protective zone at the base of branches of broad-leaved and coniferous trees and its effectiveness in preventing fungi from penetrating into the heartwood of living trees. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt (German Journal of Forest Science) 94:140–152.

     OpenUrl
198. 1. von Aufess, H.

     1984. Some examples of wood discolourations related to mechanisms for potential protection of living trees against fungal attack. Intern. Assoc. Wood Anatomy Bulletin 5:133–138.

     OpenUrl
199. 1. Wang, S.-Y.,
     2. C.-M. Chiu, and
     3. C.-J. Lin

     . 2003. Application of the drilling resistance method for annual ring characteristics: evaluation of Taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides) trees grown with different thinning and pruning treatments. Journal of Wood Science 49:116–124.

     OpenUrl
200. 1. Wardlaw, T., and
     2. W. Neilsen

     . 1999. Decay and other defects associated with pruned branches of Eucalyptus nitens. Tasforests 11:49–57.

     OpenUrl
201. 1. Watson, G.

     1998. Tree growth after trenching and compensatory crown pruning. Journal of Arboriculture 24:47–53.

     OpenUrl
202. 1. Wilson, B.

     2000. Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants. American Journal of Botany 87:601–607.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
203. 1. Wiseman, D.,
     2. P. Smethurst,
     3. L. Pinkard,
     4. T. Wardlaw,
     5. C.L. Beadle,
     6. M. Hall,
     7. C. Baillie, and
     8. C. Mohammed

     . 2006. Pruning and fertiliser effects on branch size and decay in two Eucalyptus nitens plantations. Forest Ecology Management 225:123–133.

     OpenUrl
204. 1. Yamamoto, S.

     1985. Programmed tree pruning and public liability. Journal of Arboriculture 11:15–17.

     OpenUrl
205. ↵
     1. ZTV-Baumpflege

     . 2001. Additional technical agreements and guidelines for arboriculture. 4th edition. Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung - Landschaftsbau.e (FLL).