Plant Available Moisture in Stone-soil Media for Use Under Pavement While Allowing Urban Tree Root Growth

LITERATURE CITED

1. 1. American Society of Testing Materials

   . 1997a. Section 4: Construction. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials. 04.08 Soil and Rock (I) D420-D4914.
2. 1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

   . 1995. Standard specifications of transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing 17th edition. Washington DC, AASHTO. Part II Tests.
3. ↵
   1. Atkins, H.N.

   1997. Section 1.54 Soil Water. In: Highway materials, soils, and concretes 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
4. ↵
   1. Bühler, O.,
   2. P. Kristofferson, and
   3. S.U. Larson

   . 2007. Growth of street trees in Copenhagen with emphasis on the effect of different establishment concepts. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33(5):330–337.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Carolina Stalite Company

   . 2007. Product specifications and Stalite structural soil specifications. http://www.stalite.com/specifications2.html accessed: December 3, 2007.
6. ↵
   1. Costello, L.R., and
   2. K.S. Jones

   . 2003. Reducing infrastructure damage by tree roots: A compendium of strategies. WCISA. 119 p.
7. ↵
   1. Craul, Phillip J.

   1992. Urban Soils in Landscape Design. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, NY.
8. ↵
   1. Donahue, R.L.,
   2. R.W. Miller, and
   3. J.C. Shickluna

   . 1983. Soils an introduction to soils and plant growth 5th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. ↵
   1. Grabosky, J.

   1999. Growth response of three tree species in sidewalk profiles. PhD Dissertation Cornell University.
10. ↵
    1. Grabosky, J.

    1996. Developing a structural soil material with high bearing strength and increased rooting volumes for street trees under sidewalks. MS Thesis. Cornell University.
11. ↵
    1. Grabosky, J., and
    2. N. Bassuk

    . 2008. Sixth- and tenth-year growth measurements for three tree species in a load-bearing stone-soil blend under pavement and a tree lawn in Brooklyn, New York, U.S. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(4):265–266.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Grabosky, J.,
    2. N. Bassuk, and
    3. H. van Es

    . 1996. Further testing of rigid urban tree soil materials for use under pavement to increase street tree rooting volumes. Journal of Arboriculture 22(6):255–263.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Grabosky J.,
    2. N. Bassuk,
    3. L. Irwin, and
    4. H. van Es

    . 2001. Shoot and root growth of three tree species in sidewalk profiles. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 19(4):206–211.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Grabosky, J.,
    2. N. Bassuk, and
    3. B.Z. Marranca

    . 2002. Preliminary findings from measuring street tree shoot growth in two skeletal soil installations compared to tree lawn plantings. Journal of Arboriculture 28(2):106–108.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Haffner, E.C.

    2008. Porous asphalt and turf: Exploring new applications through hydrological characterization of CU Structural Soil and Carolina Stalite Structural Soil. MS Thesis. Cornell University.
16. ↵
    1. Liu, H.H., and
    2. J.H. Dane

    . 1995. Improved computational procedure for retention relations of immiscible fluids using pressure cells. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59:1520-1524.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. New York State Department of Transportation

    . 2006. 2006 Standard specifications; construction and materials. Office of Engineering, Albany, NY. 7.03.
18. ↵
    1. New York State Department of Transportation

    . 1990. Standard specifications; construction and materials. Office of Engineering, Albany, NY. 7.15–7.20.
19. ↵
    1. Ogden, C.B.,
    2. H.M. van Es, and
    3. R.R. Schindelbeck

    . 1997. Miniature rain simulator for measurement of infiltration and runoff. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61:1041–1043
20. ↵
    1. Scholander, P.F.,
    2. H.T. Hammel,
    3. E.A. Hemmingsen, and
    4. E.D. Bradstreet

    . 1964. Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of Mangroves and some other plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 52:119–125
21. ↵
    1. Smiley, E.T.,
    2. L. Calfee,
    3. B. Fraedrich, and
    4. E.J. Smiley

    . 2006. Compaction of Structural Soil and Noncompacted Soils for Trees Surrounded by Pavement. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 32(4):164–169.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Tokunaga T.K.,
    2. K.R. Olson, and
    3. J. Wan

    . 2003. Moisture characteristics of Hanford gravels: Bulk, grain-surface, and intragranular components. Vadose Zone Journal 2:322–329.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Tokunaga T.K.,
    2. J. Wan, and
    3. K.R. Olson

    . 2002. Saturation matric potential relations in gravel. Water Resources Research 38(10).
24. ↵
    1. M.R. Carter

    1. Topp G.C.,
    2. Y.T. Galganov,
    3. B.C. Ball, and
    4. M.R. Carter

    . 1993. Soil Water Desorption curves. In: M.R. Carter (Ed.). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL. pp 569–580.
25. ↵
    1. Williams L.E., and
    2. F.J. Araujo

    . 2002. Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 127(3):448–454.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text