Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Frequency and Severity of Trunk Decay in Street Tree Maples in Four New York Cities

Christopher J. Luley, David J. Nowak and Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 2009, 35 (2) 94-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.017
Christopher J. Luley
Christopher J. Luley (corresponding author), Vice President, Urban Forestry LLC, 6050 Hicks Rd., Naples, NY 14512, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
David J. Nowak
David J. Nowak, Project Leader, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric J. Greenfield
Eric J. Greenfield, Forester, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Listen

A proportional random selection of street tree Norway, silver, and sugar maples, and other species among four diameter classes were surveyed in the U.S.’ New York cities of Albany, Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse for decay incidence and severity. Decay was determined by drilling sampled trees with a Resistograph and calculating the ratio of sound wood to radius. Overall, 58.3% of the sampled trees had some amount of decay and incidence was highest in sugar maples and in the largest size class trees. However, decay incidence was high (53.2%) even in the smallest diameter tree size class (30.5–45.7cm (12–18 in). Decay severity was greatest in silver maple and in the largest diameter trees, although only 3.2% of the trees sampled had serious decay. The study shows that decay is common in street trees but is seldom severe. It also suggests that decay becomes established early in the life of street trees but is most severe in larger diameter trees and in trees that compartmentalize decay poorly such as silver maple. The frequency and severity of decay in the cities studied indicates that they need to continue to identify and manage trees with decay.

Key Words
  • Decay
  • Resistograph
  • street trees
  • maples
  • hazard trees
  • carbon loss

Little is known about the frequency and severity of decay in urban trees. Tate (1984; Tate 1986) quantified the incidence of decay in trees using an increment borer, and found that it ranged from 13% in street trees in New Jersey to 16% in Central Park, New York City. The development of a number of commercially available decay detecting tools, such as the Resistograph, Picus tomography, tree radar, and others (Nicolotti and Miglietta 1998; Gilbert and Smiley 2004) now allow a more extensive investigation of both the incidence and severity of decay in trees using minimally invasive testing methods.

In New York State, maples species frequently dominate the street tree population, and it is common for Norway (Acer platanoides), silver (A. saccharinum), sugar (A. saccharum), red (A. rubrum), and other maples to comprise over 50% of the population in both small communities and larger cities (Manion 1981a; Jaenson et al. 1992; Sisinni et al. 1995). In some cases, Norway maple alone may comprise over 50% of the planted street trees (Manion 1981a). Many of these maples were replacements for the American elms (Ulmus americana) that were lost as a result of the Dutch elm disease epidemic that started in the 1930’s (Nowak and Rowntree 1990). Therefore, a significant portion of this maple population is mature; and the health, structural stability, and carbon storage as affected by wood decay, is in question. Furthermore, the upstate New York maple population is threatened by the presence and potential northern and western spread of the Asian Longhorned Beetle currently known to infest parts of New York City, Long Island, Massachusetts and New Jersey. This insect has potential to seriously impact the health and structural stability of maples and other species in New York.

This research was initiated to determine the incidence and severity of wood decay in street tree maples and other species in Albany, Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse, New York. It used a Resistograph, visual evaluation, and sounding evaluation with a mallet to estimate decay frequency and amounts. The Resistograph allows for rapid decay testing and has been used in a variety of testing environments including decay in trees (Costello and Quarles 1999; Bethge et al. 1996; Mattheck et al. 1997), wood in service (Brashaw et al. 2005), and assessment of wood density of genetic crosses (Isik and Li 2003). This paper reveals the first set of results from this research on the frequency of decay and severity of decay in street tree trunks among four cities, four tree species classes, and four diameter classes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Listen

Sample Selection

The sample for the study was taken from street tree inventory data of trees greater than 30.5 cm (12 in) in diameter provided by the cities of Albany, Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse, New York. The inventories in each city were complete except for Albany where outlying portions of the city had yet to be inventoried. The initial sample was comprised of a random selection of 480 trees per city, and included thirty Norway, silver, and sugar maple, and “other” species (random selection from all other species present in the city) in each of four diameter-at-breast-height (DBH; diameter at 1.37 m (4.5 ft) classes. The random selection of trees was made in each selection class (diameter and species) by pooling all the trees from the inventory for each city individually and then selecting from that pool of species. Other species included in the sample, starting with the most frequent were, Tilia cordata, Gleditsia triacanthos, Platanus x acerifolia, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Acer rubrum, Aeculus hippocastanum, Quercus rubra, F. americana, Ulmus spp., Q. palustris, T. americana, Zelkova serrata, P. occidentalis, Acer negundo, Celtis occidentalis, and Liquidambar styraciflua, and 39 other species that comprised the remaining 15% of the sample. The four DBH classes were 30.5–45.7 cm (12-18 in), 45.7–61 cm (18–24 in), 61–76.2 cm (24–30 in), and greater than 76.2 cm (30 in). Field data were collected from June to October, 2007.

Decay Testing Procedures

All trees were tested for decay by drilling three times at DBH using the Resistograph F400. The Resistograph uses a 38 cm (15 in), 3 mm (0.12 in) diameter drill bit to record mechanical resistance to the bit on chart paper (Mattheck et al. 1997). The largest diameter class of trees tested was greater than 76.2 cm (30 in) and the drill bit would not have sampled the wood deeper in the stem beyond the 38 cm (15 in) it extends. Therefore, the presence of decay in the largest diameter class would be underestimated using this drilling method. By detecting decay as a decrease in resistance to the drill bit, the tool allows a measurement of the thickness of outer shell of wood showing high resistance to the bit (interpreted in this study as non-decayed wood or sound wood) at the drill site (Mattheck et al. 1997). A drop in resistance for more than 13 mm (0.5 inch) was interpreted as the indication of decay. In cases where the bark and cambium were dead and sapwood was decayed but wood deeper in the stem was solid, or sapwood rot (Luley 2006) was present, the thickness of the outer shell was recorded as zero. After removing the thickness of the bark, the thickness of the outer shell of non-decayed wood was recorded after the evaluation of each drill path.

Decay incidence and severity were also evaluated at each tree using indicators of decay (Shigo 1966; Manion 1981b; Young 1984; Mattheck and Breleor 1994; Luley 2006). Each decay indicator was evaluated visually and then tested by sounding around the circumference of the tree at the site of the indicator with a 170 g (6 oz) Sears Craftsman hammer (model number 38292) with a hardened plastic head. Visual assessment and sounding were used to make a field judgment of a second test location for decay. A series of three Resistograph F400 drillings around the circumference of the tree was made at the height of the decay indicator that was assessed to have the greatest amount of decay based on visual assessment and sounding. If no decay indicators were present, the tree was drilled only three times at breast height. Decay testing was performed only on the main trunk above the roots to a height of 3.1 m (10 ft). Scaffold branches were not tested for decay if the tree forked below 3.1 m. However, if decay indicators were present on buttress roots adjacent to the trunk, the indicator was tested for decay at the trunk above the indicator.

Statistical Analysis

Sampled trees were categorized into presence or absence of decay. Decay was indicated if a Resistograph drilling at either DBH or at an indicator produced a ratio of sound wood distance to stem radius of less than 1.00. Sampled trees were also placed into one of five categories based on the amount of decay averaged from the three Resistograph drilling at either DBH or at an decay indicator as follows; less then 0.1 of the radius remaining as sound wood; between 0.1 and 0.3 of the radius remaining as sound wood; between 0.3 and 0.5 of the radius remaining as sound wood; more than 0.5 and less than 1.0 of the radius remaining as sound wood; and no decay present or a ratio of 1.0. Each set of data was analyzed among the categories of cities, tree species, and DBH using χ2 analysis with an alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Listen

Sample Summary

Tables 1 and 2 summarize the sample distribution among the four cities, four tree species categories, and four DBH categories. A total of 1848 trees were evaluated for decay. The random sample of trees was most difficult to obtain in Albany because of its smaller tree population, and for sugar maple because of its relative scarcity compared to the other maple species (Table 1). Small diameter silver maples are also relatively rare because most cities are no longer planting this species.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Distribution of samples (n) in species and DBH by city.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Distribution of samples (n) in DBH by species.

Decay Incidence

Figures 1–3 summarize the incidence of decay by city, species, and DBH. Overall, 1078 of the 1848 samples (58.3%) had some decay. The greatest amount of decay in sampled trees was in Syracuse at 61.2%, while the least was found in Buffalo at 56%, although χ2 analysis showed no difference amongst cities (Figure 1). The highest incidence of decay by species class was in sugar maple at 63%, and the least was in silver maple 53.6% and incidence was significantly different amongst species (Figure 2). For DBH classes, the largest number of decayed trees was found in the 61–76.2 cm (24–30 in) DBH class at 63.2%, and the least in the 30.5–45.7cm (12–18 in) DBH class at 53.2% (Figure 3).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Decay incidence in Albany, Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse (positive incidence if ratio of sound wood distance to radius was less than 1.00 at either DBH or indicator test sites drilled with a Resistograph F400). χ2 analysis showed no difference amongst the cities (p = 0.05 χ2 test statistic = 2.9 for 3 degrees of freedom with a critical value of 7.8).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Decay incidence by species (positive incidence if ratio of sound wood distance to radius was less than 1.00 at either DBH or indicator test sites drilled with a Resistograph F400). χ2 analysis showed a significant difference amongst the species (p = 0.05 χ2 test statistic = 15.6 for 3 degrees of freedom with a critical value of 7.8).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Decay incidence by DBH classes (positive incidence if ratio of sound wood distance to radius was less than 1.00 at either DBH or indicator test sites drilled with a Resistograph F400). χ2 analysis showed a significant difference amongst the diameter classes (p = 0.05 χ2 test statistic = 10.2 for 3 degrees of freedom with a critical value of 7.8).

Decay Severity

Figures 4-7 summarize decay severity by city, species, and DBH. Overall, 60 of the 1848 samples had severe decay (3.2%) where more than two-thirds of the radius was decayed. Severe decay was determined when the calculated ratio of sound wood distance to radius was equal to or less than 0.30 (over two-thirds of radius decayed) based on an average from the Resistograph results at either DBH or at an indicator.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Distribution of decay severity based on the ratio of sound wood distance to radius for all the trees sampled in the four cities combined.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Incidence of severe decay in Albany, Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse (positive incidence if ratio of sound wood distance to radius was less than or equal to 0.30 at either DBH or indicator). χ2 analysis showed no significant difference amongst the cities (p = 0.05 χ2 test statistic = 7.5 for 3 degrees of freedom with a critical value of 7.8).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Incidence of severe decay by species (positive incidence if ratio of sound wood distance to radius was less than or equal to 0.30 at either DBH or indicator). χ2 analysis showed a significant difference amongst the tree species (p = 0.05 χ2 test statistic = 9.7 for 3 degrees of freedom with a critical value of 7.8).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Severe decay incidence by DBH class (positive incidence if ratio of sound wood distance to radius was less than or equal to 0.30 at either DBH or indicator). χ2 analysis showed a significant difference amongst the diameter classes (p = 0.05 χ2 test statistic = 33.3 for 3 degrees of freedom with a critical value of 7.8).

The greatest amount of severe decay of sampled trees was in Buffalo at 4.5%, and the least was found in Rochester at 1.5%, but severity was not significantly different amongst cities (Figure 5). Silver maple had the greatest amount of severe decay with 5.3%, while the least was sugar maple at 1.8% and species was significantly different for severe decay (Figure 6). For DBH classes, the largest amount of decayed trees were found in the greater than 76.2 cm DBH class at 7.2%, and the least in the 30.5-45.7cm (12-18 in) DBH class at 0.3% and DBH was significant (Figure 7).

DISCUSSION

Listen

Incidence of Decay

Decay incidence in the trees sampled was substantially higher than reported by Tate (1984; Tate 1986) as over 58% of the trees had at least some decay in this study. Tate (1986) reported decay incidence of 13% for street trees in New Jersey. However, that study used an increment borer of unspecified length and only tested trees in a single location. In this study, decay beyond the length of the Resistograph drill bit would have gone undetected in trees that were in the largest diameter classes or greater than 76.2 cm DBH. Therefore, decay incidence may be higher than what is reported in this study and may account for the lower incidence in the largest diameter trees compared to the trees in the 61–76.2 cm (24–30 in) DBH class (Figure 3). However, decay beyond 38 cm (15 in) would not have a significant effect on the stability of the trunk (Kane et al. 2001).

Decay incidence in silver maple was lower than other species, although this tree is well known to be prone to decay (Matheny and Clark 1994). This result may be due to the management activities of the cities forestry programs as silver maple is often targeted for removal because of its decay and defect susceptibility.

Interestingly, decay was present in over 50% of the trees in the smallest diameter class. This result suggests that decay may become established early in the life cycle of a planted street tree. However, our results showed that decay in smaller size class trees was seldom severe (Figure 7). The origin of the decay (type of wound) in these smaller diameter trees would be worth investigation as it may offer management practices to reduce decay incidence in urban street trees.

Severity of Decay

Severely decayed street trees, which are most likely to pose an immediate hazard to property and life, comprised 3% of the sample trees (Figure 4). Data from the study has been provided to each city to allow them to make further inspection and to determine if pruning or removal are necessary. Silver maple had the highest incidence of severely decayed trees. This result is in line with what is known about the reduced ability of silver maple to compartmentalize decay (Hepting 1971). It also suggests that these cities may not be identifying the most decayed silver maples trees for removal given that decay incidence for silver maple was the lowest.

Sugar maple and the random selection of other species present in the four cities had the lowest incidence of severely decayed trees. Sugar maple compartmentalizes decay well (Smith et al. 2001); this result also suggests that a collection of other species with varying decay compartmentalization abilities may be a buffer to the development of severely decayed trees in a population.

These results show that the incidence of severely decayed trees was relatively low in these four cities. Importantly, these data do not represent failure rates, although trees with greater than two-thirds their radius decayed are believed to be at increased risk for failure (Mattheck et al. 1993). However, the ability to predict failure based on decay severity alone has been questioned recently (Brudi and van Wassenaer 2002; Bond 2006; Gruber 2007).

Management Implications

Without street tree management intervention, the proportion of severely decayed trees would be expected to increase as trees mature. The total population of trees greater than 30.5 cm in the four cities is approximately 67,000. Despite the low incidence of severely decayed trees, there may be over 2,000 seriously decayed trees on the streets in these cities. The location of trees with extensive decay along streets is important because of the higher target occupancy attributed to trees in street locations (Ellison 2005). However, not all trees with decay require removal as strength loss in tree trunks due to decay is low unless decay is severe (Kane et al. 2001). Other factors such as tree exposure, height, and wood strength also affect the risk of failure (Brudi and van Wassenaer 2002). Based on the frequency and severity of decay found in this study, management practices that continue to identify and remove severely decayed trees is important in these and other cities. The implications of these results also need to be addressed as communities and researchers attempt to quantify the environmental and societal benefits of urban trees. Based on these results, estimates of carbon storage by urban trees may need to be adjusted for decay, because wood decay fungi release carbon dioxide (a prominent greenhouse gas implicated in global climate change) as they enzimatically digest the wood of living trees. More study is needed to determine the volume of wood decayed in urban trees and the impact of decay on carbon storage. The high incidence of decay documented in this study of street trees indicate that the research published on carbon storage in urban trees (Nowak and Crane 2002; Nowak et al. 2002) may need to be adjusted for decay losses if this degree of decay is found throughout the urban forest.

Acknowledgments

Listen

The authors acknowledge the generous support of the Hyland Johns Tree Fund and the New York State Department of Conservation which provided monetary support for this research. We also acknowledge Oliver Hein of IML, Inc. for Resistograph assistance.

  • Copyright © 2009, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

LITERATURE CITED

Listen
  1. ↵
    1. Bethge, K.,
    2. C. Mattheck, and
    3. E. Hunger
    . 1996. Equipment for the detection and evaluation of incipient decay in trees. Arboricultural Journal 20:13–37.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Bond, J.
    2006. Foundations of tree risk analysis: Use of t/R to evaluate trunk failure potential. Arborist News 31–34.
  3. ↵
    1. Brashaw, B.K.,
    2. R.J. Vatalaro,
    3. J.P. Wacker, and
    4. R.J. Ross
    . 2005. Condition assessment of timber bridges. 1. Evaluation of a micro-drilling resistance tool. USDA General Technical Report FPL-GTR-159.
  4. ↵
    1. Smiley E. T. and
    2. K. Coder
    1. Brudi, E., and
    2. P. van Wassenaer
    . 2002. Trees and statics: Nondestructive failure analysis. In Smiley E. T. and K. Coder (Eds.). Tree Structure and Mechanics Conference Proceedings: How trees stand up and fall down. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
  5. ↵
    1. Costello, L.R., and
    2. S.L. Quarles
    . 1999. Detection of wood decay in blue gum and elm: An evaluation of the Resistograph and the portable drill. Journal of Arboriculture 25:311–317.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Ellison, M.J.
    2005. Quantified tree risk assessment used in the management of amenity trees. Journal of Arboriculture 31:57–65.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Gilbert, E.A., and
    2. E.T. Smiley
    . 2004. Picus sonic tomography for the quantification of decay in white oak (Quercus alba) and hickory (Carya spp.) Journal of Arboriculture 30:277–281.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Gruber, F.
    2007. Die VTA-0,32-estwandstärkenregel, wissenschaftlich unhaltbar und praktisch unbrauchbar. Agrar- und Umweltrecht 1:7–12.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Isik, F., and
    2. B. Li
    . 2003. Rapid assessment of wood density of live trees using the Resistograph for selection in tree improvement programs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:2426–2435.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Hepting, G.H.
    1971. 1971. Disease of forest and shade trees of the United States. USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook Number 386. 658 pp.
  11. ↵
    1. Jaenson, R.,
    2. N. Bassuk,
    3. S. Schwager, and
    4. D. Headley
    . 1992. A statistical method of the accurate and rapid sampling of urban street tree populations. Journal of Arboriculture 18:171–183.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Kane, B.,
    2. D. Ryan, and
    3. D. V. Bloniarz
    . 2001. Comparing formulae that assess strength loss due to decay. Journal of Arboriculture 27:78–87.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Luley, C. J.
    2006. Identifying wood decay and wood decay fungi. Arborist News 15:12–19.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Manion, P.D.
    1981a. Norway maple decline. Journal of Arboriculture 7:38–42.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Manion, P.D.
    1981b. Tree disease concepts. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 399 pp.
  16. ↵
    1. Matheny N.,
    2. Clark J.
    1994. A photographic guide to the evaluation of hazard trees in urban areas. 2nd edition International Society of Arboriculture. Savoy, IL. 85 pp.
  17. ↵
    1. Mattheck, C., and
    2. H. Breleor
    . 1994. Field guide for visual tree assessment (VTA). Arboricultural Journal 18:1–23.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Mattheck, C.,
    2. K. Bethge, and
    3. D. Erb
    , 1993. Failure criteria for trees. Arboricultural Journal 17:201–209.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Mattheck, C.,
    2. K. Bethge, and
    3. W. Albrecht
    . 1997. How to read the results of the Resistograph M. Arboricultural Journal 21:331–346.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Nicolotti, G., and
    2. P. Miglietta
    . 1998. Using high-technology instruments to assess defects in trees. Journal of Arboriculture 24: 297–302.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. R. Rowntree
    . 1990. History and range of Norway maple. Journal of Arboriculture 16:291–296.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. J.C. Stevens,
    3. S.M. Sisinni and
    4. C.J. Luley
    . 2002. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture 28:113–122.
    OpenUrl
    1. Nowak, D.J. and
    2. D.E. Crane
    . 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration in urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 116:381–389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.
    1966. Decay and discoloration following logging wounds on northern hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper, NE-47.
  24. ↵
    1. Smith, K.T.,
    2. W.C. Shortle, and
    3. K.R. Dudzik
    . 2001. Patterns of storm injury and tree response. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, NA-TP-02–01.
  25. ↵
    1. Sisinni, S.M.,
    2. W.C. Zipperer, and
    3. A.G. Pleninger
    . 1995. Impacts from a major ice storm: Street tree damage in Rochester, NY. Journal of Arboriculture 21:156–167.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Tate, R.L.
    1984. Stem decay in Central Park. Journal of Arboriculture 10:307-308.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Tate, R.L.
    1986. Stem decay in street trees in New Jersey and park trees in Central Park, New York. Journal of Arboriculture 12:73–74.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Young, C.W.T.
    1984. The external signs of decay in trees. Arboricultural Leaflet 1. 12pp.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 35 (2)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 35, Issue 2
March 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Frequency and Severity of Trunk Decay in Street Tree Maples in Four New York Cities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Frequency and Severity of Trunk Decay in Street Tree Maples in Four New York Cities
Christopher J. Luley, David J. Nowak, Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2009, 35 (2) 94-99; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2009.017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Frequency and Severity of Trunk Decay in Street Tree Maples in Four New York Cities
Christopher J. Luley, David J. Nowak, Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2009, 35 (2) 94-99; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2009.017
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Urban Trees and Cooling: A Review of the Recent Literature (2018 to 2024)
  • Aerial Imagery as a Tool for Monitoring Urban Tree Retention: Applications, Strengths and Challenges for Backyard Tree Planting Programs
  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • decay
  • Resistograph
  • street trees
  • maples
  • hazard trees
  • carbon loss

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire