Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Strip Malls, City Trees, and Community Values

Kathleen L. Wolf
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 2009, 35 (1) 33-40; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.008
Kathleen L. Wolf
Kathleen L. Wolf, Research Social Scientist, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Visual presentation of survey scenarios.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Image preference categories.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Streetside monument signage.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Place perceptions–categories and means comparisons.

    Perceptions categoriesScenario
    No Vegetation [Mean (SD)]Mature Vegetation [Mean (SD)]Independent samples t-test
    Category 1: Business Quality3.76 (0.88)4.30 (0.93)t = −3.552, P < 0.001, df = 144
    Category 2: Amenities and Attractions2.97 (1.31)5.23 (1.21)t = −10.902, P < 0.001, df = 147
    Category 3: Positive Merchants3.82 (1.07)4.77 (1.18)t = −5.107, P < 0.001, df = 144
    Category 4: Wayfinding5.90 (0.81)4.27 (1.31)t = 9.003, P < 0.001, df = 149
    • Note. Item ratings: 1 = strongly disagree through 7 = strongly agree.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Patronage variables–scenario comparisons.

    Patronage variableScenarios
    No VegetationMature Vegetation
    Time willing to travel to reach place?
        Pearson χ2 = 11.310, P < 0.004, Cramer’s V = 0.271
        Less than 10 min5532
        10 to 20 min4153
        More than 20 min415
        Total100%100%
    n = 82n = 72
    Distance willing to travel?
        Pearson χ2 = 5.185, P < 0.075, Cramer’s V = 0.183
        Up to 2 mi4024
        2 to 5 mi3236
        More than 5 mi2840
        Total100%100%
    n = 82n = 72
    Time would spend during visit?
        Pearson χ2 = 11.327, P < 0.003, Cramer’s V = 0.272
        Up to 10 min2912
        10 to 30 min5449
        More than 30 min1739
        Total100%100%
    n = 81n = 72
    Frequency or how often return?
        Pearson χ2 = 17.664, P < 0.000, Cramer’s V = 0.354
        Less than once a month5420
        Once a week to once a month3351
        Once a week or more1329
        Total100%100%
    n = 76n = 65
    • Response frequencies expressed as percentages.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Products pricing–scenario comparisons.

    IndexScenariosIndependent samples t-test
    No Vegetation [Mean (SD)]Mature Vegetation [Mean (SD)]
    Convenience goods  7.74 (3.23)10.34 (4.10)t = −3.840, P < 0.000, df = 116
    Shopping goods37.88 (16.60)52.96 (17.68)t = −4.650, P < 0.000, df = 110
    Specialty goods54.64 (26.25)67.24 (24.58)t = −2.220, P < 0.03, df = 79
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 35 (1)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Strip Malls, City Trees, and Community Values
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Strip Malls, City Trees, and Community Values
Kathleen L. Wolf
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2009, 35 (1) 33-40; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2009.008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Strip Malls, City Trees, and Community Values
Kathleen L. Wolf
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2009, 35 (1) 33-40; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2009.008
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • METHODS AND PROCEDURES
    • ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Contingent valuation
  • mall
  • preference
  • public response
  • retail
  • roadside
  • survey
  • visual quality

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire