Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services

David J. Nowak, Daniel E. Crane, Jack C. Stevens, Robert E. Hoehn, Jeffrey T. Walton and Jerry Bond
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2008, 34 (6) 347-358; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2008.048
David J. Nowak
David J. Nowak (corresponding author), USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Daniel E. Crane
Daniel E. Crane, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack C. Stevens
Jack C. Stevens, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Hoehn
Robert E. Hoehn, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey T. Walton
Jeffrey T. Walton, Paul Smith’s College, Routes 86 & 30, P.O. Box 265, Paul Smiths, NY 12970-0265, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerry Bond
Jerry Bond, Consulting Urban Forester, Urban Forestry LLC, 3904 Willowdale Lane, Geneva, NY 14456-9267, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    General plot information collected for the UFORE Model.

    VariableDescription
    Plot IDzUnique identifier
    Plot addressy
    Date and crew
    Photo numberUsed to help identify plot
    Measurement unitszUnits for all measurement in the plot; metric (m/cm) or English (ft/in)
    Reference objectsyAt least two objects that will assist in locating plot center for future plot remeasurements
    Distance to reference objectyDistance from plot center to each reference object (ft or m)
    Direction to objectyDirection from plot center to each reference object (degrees)
    Tree measurement point (TMP)yIf plot center falls on a building or other surface (such as a highway) where plot center cannot be accessed, the plot is not moved; all distances and directions to trees are measured and recorded from a recorded fixed point (e.g., building corner) referred to as the TMP
    Percent measuredzProportion of the plot that is actually measured as portions of plot may be denied access
    Land usezAs determined by crew in the field from a standard list of land uses
    Percent inzProportion of the plot in each land use to nearest 1%
    Tree coverzPercent of plot area covered by tree canopies estimated to nearest 5%
    Shrub coverzPercent of plot area covered by shrub canopies estimated to nearest 5%
    Plantable spacePercent of plot area that is plantable for trees (i.e., plantable soils space not filled with tree canopies) and tree planting would not be restricted as a result of land use (footpath, baseball field, and so on); to nearest 5%
    • ↵zRequired for UFORE analysis.

    • ↵yRequired for permanent reference of plot.

    • UFORE = Urban Forest Effects.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Shrub information collected for the UFORE Model.

    VariableDescription
    Species codeSpecies code from standard list currently containing over 10,000 tree and shrub species
    Average height of massWhere mass is a group of shrubs species or genera of similar height (ft or m)
    Percent areaPercent of total shrub cover on plot occupied by shrub mass
    Percent shrub mass missingPercent of shrub mass volume (height × ground area) that is not occupied by leaves; estimated to nearest 5%
    • UFORE = Urban Forest Effects.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Tree variables collected for UFORE analysis with associated reason for data collection

    VariableDescription
    Tree IDUnique tree number
    Distance (ft/m) and direction (degrees) from plot center or TMPzUsed to identify and locate trees for future measurements; TMP is tree measurement point (Table 1)
    Species codey (A, C, E, S, V)Species code from standard list currently containing over 10,000 tree and shrub species
    Number of dbhs recordedyFor multistemmed trees
    Dbhy (C, S)Diameter at breast height (in/cm) for all recorded stems
    Dbh measurement heightRecorded if dbh is not measured at 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
    Total heighty (A, C, E, S, V)Height to top of tree (ft/m)
    Height to crown basey (A, S, V)Height to base of live crown (ft/m)
    Crown widthy (A, S, V)Recorded by two measurements: N-S (north–south) and E-W (east–west) widths (ft/m)
    Percent canopy missingy (A, S, V)The percent of the crown volume that is not occupied by leaves; two perpendicular measures of missing leaf mass are made and the average result is recorded; recorded to nearest 5%
    Diebacky (C,E, S)Percent crown dieback to nearest 5%
    Percent impervious beneath canopy (H)Percent of land area beneath entire tree canopy’s drip line that is impervious
    Percent shrub cover beneath canopy (H)Percent of land area beneath canopy drip line that is occupied by shrubs
    Crown light exposurey (C, S)Number of sides of the tree receiving sunlight from above; used to estimate competition and growth rates
    Distance (ft/m) and direction (degrees) to space-conditioned residential buildingsy (E)Measured for trees at least 6.1 m (20 ft) tall and within 18.3 m (60 ft) of structures three stories or less in height
    Street treeY/N; used to estimate proportion of population that is street trees
    Tree statusIndicates if tree is new or removed from last measurement period
    • ↵zRequired for permanent reference of plot.

    • ↵yRequired for UFORE analysis.

    • Variable used to assess: A = air pollution removal; C = carbon storage/sequestration; E = energy conservation; H = hydrologic effects; S = structural information; V = VOC emissions.

    • UFORE = Urban Forest Effects.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Estimates of total number of trees and standard error (SE), tree density, percent tree cover, leaf area index (LAI), and most common tree species from 14 cities analyzed using the UFORE model.z

    CityNumber of treesTree density (no./ha)Tree cover (%)LAIyMost common tree speciesYearSample typexNo. of plots
    TotalSE
    Atlanta, GAw9,415,000749,000275.836.72.2Liquidambar styraciflua1997SR205
    Baltimore, MDv2,571,000494,000122.921.01.3Fagus grandifolia2004SR200
    Boston, MAw1,183,000109,000  82.922.31.0Acer platanoides1996SR217
    Casper, WYu   123,000  16,000  22.5  8.90.3Populus sargentii2006RG234
    Freehold, NJt     48,000    6,000  94.634.41.6Acer platanoides1998SR144
    Jersey City, NJt   136,000  22,000  35.511.50.4Ailanthus altissima1998SR220
    Minneapolis, MNs   979,000165,000  64.726.41.0Fraxinus pennsylvanica2004RG110
    Moorestown, NJt   583,000  53,000153.428.01.7Acer rubrum2000SR206
    New York, NYw5,212,000719,000  65.220.90.9Ailanthus altissima1996SR206
    Philadelphia, PAw2,113,000211,000  61.915.70.8Prunus serotina1996SR210
    San Francisco, CAu   668,000  98,000  55.711.90.4Eucalyptus globulus2004RG194
    Syracuse, NYv   876,000119,000134.723.11.2Acer saccharum2001SR197
    Washington, DCr1,928,000224,000121.128.61.0Fagus grandifolia2004RG201
    Woodbridge, NJt   986,000  97,000164.329.51.6Liquidambar styraciflua2000SR215
    • ↵zDivide tree density (no./ha) by 2.471 to convert to no./ac.

    • ↵yTotal tree leaf area divided by total city area.

    • ↵xSR = stratified random; RG = randomized grid.

    • ↵wData collected by ACRT, Inc.

    • ↵vData collected by U.S. Forest Service.

    • ↵uData collected by city personnel.

    • ↵tData collected by New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

    • ↵sData collected by Davey Resource Group.

    • ↵rData collected by Casey Trees Endowment Fund and National Park Service.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 34 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 34, Issue 6
November 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services
David J. Nowak, Daniel E. Crane, Jack C. Stevens, Robert E. Hoehn, Jeffrey T. Walton, Jerry Bond
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2008, 34 (6) 347-358; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.048

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services
David J. Nowak, Daniel E. Crane, Jack C. Stevens, Robert E. Hoehn, Jeffrey T. Walton, Jerry Bond
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2008, 34 (6) 347-358; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.048
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Changes in the health-related ecosystem services and disservices provided by urban trees over multiple decades in a small city
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Air pollution removal
  • carbon sequestration
  • tree measurement
  • urban forest monitoring
  • urban forest sampling

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire