Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery

Jeffrey T. Walton, David J. Nowak and Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2008, 34 (6) 334-340; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2008.046
Jeffrey T. Walton
Jeffrey T. Walton (corresponding author), Paul Smith’s College, Routes 86 & 30, P.O. Box 265, Paul Smiths, NY 12970-0265, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
David J. Nowak
David J. Nowak, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, SUNY-ESF, 5 Moon Library, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Eric J. Greenfield
Eric J. Greenfield, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, SUNY-ESF, 5 Moon Library, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. American Forests
    . 2007. Urban Ecosystem Analysis. www.americanforests.org/resources/urbanforests/analysis.php (accessed 12/20/07).
  2. ↵
    1. Campbell, J.B.
    2007. Introduction to Remote Sensing. 4th Ed. The Guilford Press, New York, NY. 626 pp.
  3. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.F.,
    2. E.G. McPherson,
    3. H.W. Schroeder, and
    4. R.A. Rowntree
    . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18: 227–234.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.F.,
    2. D.J. Nowak,
    3. M.H. Noble, and
    4. S.M. Sisinni
    . 2000. Connecting People with Ecosystems in the 21st Century: An Assessment of Our Nation’s Urban Forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-490. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 483 pp. http://treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/12517 (accessed 1/3/08).
  5. ↵
    1. Galvin, M.,
    2. J.M. Grove, and
    3. J. O’Neil-Dunne
    . 2007. Urban tree canopy assessment and goal setting: Case studies from four cities on the eastern coast USA. Presented to the Joint ISA-IUFRO Urban Forestry Research Group Session at the 83rd Annual International Society of Arboriculture Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 30, 2007.
  6. ↵
    1. Homer, C.,
    2. J. Dewitz,
    3. J. Fry,
    4. M. Coan,
    5. N. Hossain,
    6. C. Larson,
    7. N. Herold,
    8. A. McKerrow,
    9. J.N. VanDriel, and
    10. J. Wickham
    . 2007. Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the Coterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 73: 337–341. www.mrlc.gov/pdfs/April_07_highlight.pdf (accessed 1/3/08).
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Huang, C.,
    2. L. Yang,
    3. B. Wylie, and
    4. C. Homer
    . 2001. A strategy for estimating tree canopy density using Landsat 7 ETM+ and high-resolution images over large areas. In: Third International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry, Denver, CO. http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/canopy_density.pdf (accessed 1/3/08).
  8. ↵
    1. Irani, F.M., and
    2. M.F. Galvin
    . 2002. Strategic Urban Forests Assessment. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Baltimore, MD.
  9. ↵
    1. Iverson, L.R., and
    2. E.A. Cook
    . 2000. Urban forest cover of the Chicago region and its relation to household density and income. Urban Ecosystems 4: 105–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Morisette, J.T.,
    2. S. Khorram, and
    3. T. Mace
    . 1999. Land-cover change detection enhanced with generalized linear models. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 2703–2721.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Myeong, S.,
    2. P.F. Hopkins, and
    3. D.J. Nowak
    . 2001. Urban cover mapping using digital, high-spatial resolution aerial imagery. Urban Ecosystems 5: 243–256.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.
    1994. Understanding the structure of urban forests. Journal of Forestry 92: 42–46.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane,
    3. J.C. Stevens, and
    4. R.E. Hoehn
    . 2005. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: Field Data Collection Manual, V1b. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Syracuse, NY. www.fs.fed.us/ne/syracuse/Tools/downloads/UFORE_Manual.pdf (accessed 12/20/07).
  14. ↵
    1. Kuser, J.
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. J.F. Dwyer
    . 2007. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems, pp. 25–46. In: Kuser, J. (Ed.). Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, NY.
  15. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. R.A. Rowntree,
    3. E.G. McPherson,
    4. S.M. Sisinni,
    5. E.R. Kerkmann, and
    6. J.C. Stevens
    . 1996. Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 49–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. O’Neil-Dunne, J.
    2007. Urban Tree Canopy Assessment. www.uvm.edu/~joneildu/?Page=utc/utc_main.html&SM=utc/sm_utc.html (accessed 1/3/08).
  17. ↵
    1. Poracsky, J., and
    2. M. Lackner
    . 2004. Urban Forest Canopy Cover in Portland, Oregon, 1972–2002; Final Report. Portland State University Cartographic Center. http://web.pdx.edu/~poracskj/Cart%20Center/psucc200404-047.pdf (accessed 1/3/08).
  18. ↵
    1. Rowntree, R.A.
    1984. Forest canopy cover and land use in four eastern United States cities. Urban Ecology 8: 55–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Small, C.
    2001. Estimation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22: 1305–1334.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Small, C., and
    2. J.W.T. Lu
    . 2006. Estimation and vicarious validation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 100: 441–456.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Walker, J.S., and
    2. J.M. Briggs
    . 2007. An object-oriented approach to urban forest mapping in Phoenix. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 73: 577–583.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Walton, J.T.
    2008. Difficulties with estimating city-wide urban forest cover change from national, remotely-sensed tree canopy maps. Urban Ecosystems 11: 81–90.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Wang, S.
    1988. An analysis of urban tree communities using Landsat thematic mapper data. Landscape and Urban Planning 15: 11–22.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Zhang, Y.
    2001. Texture-integrated classification of urban treed areas in high-resolution color-infrared imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 1359–1365.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Zhou, W., and
    2. A. Troy
    . 2008. An object-oriented approach for analysing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29: 3119–3135.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Zhu, Z.
    1994. Forest Density Mapping in the Lower 48 States: A Regression Procedure. Research Paper SO-280. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, New Orleans, LA. 11 pp. www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/rp/rp_so280.pdf (accessed 1/3/08).
  27. ↵
    1. Zipperer, W.C.,
    2. S.M. Sisinni,
    3. R.V. Pouyat, and
    4. T.W. Foresman
    . 1997. Urban tree cover: An ecological perspective. Urban Ecosystems 1: 229–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 34 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 34, Issue 6
November 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery
Jeffrey T. Walton, David J. Nowak, Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2008, 34 (6) 334-340; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.046

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery
Jeffrey T. Walton, David J. Nowak, Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2008, 34 (6) 334-340; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.046
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments.
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • remote sensing
  • urban tree canopy

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire