Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery

Jeffrey T. Walton, David J. Nowak and Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2008, 34 (6) 334-340; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2008.046
Jeffrey T. Walton
Jeffrey T. Walton (corresponding author), Paul Smith’s College, Routes 86 & 30, P.O. Box 265, Paul Smiths, NY 12970-0265, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
David J. Nowak
David J. Nowak, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, SUNY-ESF, 5 Moon Library, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Eric J. Greenfield
Eric J. Greenfield, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, SUNY-ESF, 5 Moon Library, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Accuracy assessment of cover classification for Syracuse, New York, using high-resolution digital color infrared imagery.*

    Class nameReferenceRow totalUser’s accuracy (%)Standard error (%)
    Tree/shrubGrass/herbaceousBare soilWaterImpervious surface
    Classified
        Tree/shrub  25.0    3.75    0.0    0.0    0.25  29  86.2    3.2
        Grass/herb    3.5  13.0    0.75    0.0    1.5  18.75  69.3    5.4
        Bare soil    0.0    0.0    0.5    0.0    0.75    1.25  40.0  24.5
        Water    0.0    0.0    0.0    6.5    0.0    6.5100.0    0.0
        Impervious    2.25    4.5    1.0    0  36.75  44.5  82.6    2.8
    Column total  30.75  21.25    2.25    6.5  39.25100
    Producer’s accuracy (%)  81.3  61.2  22.2100.0  93.6Overall 81.75
    Standard error (%)    3.5    5.3  14.7    0.0    2.0Overall 1.9
    • ↵*Myeong et al. (2001). Error matrix entries are based on percent of 400 ground-truth points.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Urban forest canopy cover comparison for Syracuse, New York.z

    MethodImageryYearPercent canopy coverStandard error or accuracySourcey
    Photograph interpretationPhotographic prints198424%A
    Emerge 2 ft (60 cm) (digital)199925.7%SE: 2.5%F
    NYS Orthos 1 ft (30 cm) (digital)200324.7%SE: 2.5%F
    Supervised classificationEmerge 2 ft (60 cm)199926.6%Acc: 82%D
    Subpixel–Cubist (specific)Landsat 30 mca. 200126.6%MAE: 11.7%F
    NLCD subpixel (regional)Landsat 30 mca. 200112.7%E
    USFS Forest DensityAVHRR 1.1 km199121.6%B
    USFS RPA (water removed)AVHRR 1.1 km199123.0%C
    UFORE ground sample199924.4%SE: 1.97%F
    200123.1%SE: 1.82%F
    200421.4%SE: 1.79%F
    • ↵zResults in shaded rows were generated using digital classification techniques.

    • ↵yA = Rowntree (1984); B = Zhu (1994); C = Dwyer et al. (2000); D = Myeong et al. (2001); E = USGS National Land Cover Database (2001); Homer et al. (2007); F = USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Syracuse, NY, unpublished data.

    • NLCD = National Land Cover Database; USFS RPA = U.S. Forest Service’s Resources Planning Act; UFORE = Urban Forest Effects; AVHRR = Advanced Very-High Resolution Radiometer; MAE = mean absolute error; SE = standard error.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 34 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 34, Issue 6
November 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery
Jeffrey T. Walton, David J. Nowak, Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2008, 34 (6) 334-340; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.046

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery
Jeffrey T. Walton, David J. Nowak, Eric J. Greenfield
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2008, 34 (6) 334-340; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.046
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments.
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • remote sensing
  • urban tree canopy

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire