Failure Mode and Prediction of the Strength of Branch Attachments

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Francis, J.K.

   2000. Comparison of hurricane damage to several species of urban trees in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Journal of Arboriculture 26: 189–197.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Gilman, E.F.

   2003. Branch-to-stem diameter ratio affects strength of attachment. Journal of Arboriculture 29: 291–294.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Green, D.W.,
   2. J.E. Winandy, and
   3. D.E. Kretschmann

   . 1999. Mechanical properties of wood. In: Wood Handbook—Wood as an Engineering Material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113. USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. 463 pp.
4. ↵
   1. Hauer, R.J.,
   2. W. Wang, and
   3. J.O. Dawson

   . 1993. Ice storm damage to urban trees. Journal of Arboriculture 19: 187–194.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Jim, C.Y., and
   2. H.H.T. Liu

   . 1997. Storm damage on urban trees in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 38: 45–59.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Kane, B.

   2007. Branch strength of Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana var. ‘Bradford’). Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 33: 283–291.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Kane, B., and
   2. P. Clouston

   . 2008. Tree pulling of large shade trees in the genus Acer. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 34: 101–109.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Lilly, S., and
   2. T.D. Sydnor

   . 1995. Comparison of branch failure during static loading of silver and Norway maples. Journal of Arboriculture 21: 302–305.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. MacDaniels, L.H.

   1923. The Apple-Tree Crotch. Bulletin 419. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Ithaca, NY. 22 pp.
10. ↵
    1. MacDaniels, L.H.

    1932. Factors affecting the breaking strength of apple tree crotches. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 29: 44.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Miller, V.J.

    1959. Crotch influence on strength and breaking point of apple tree branches. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 73: 27–32.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Muller, U.,
    2. W. Gindl, and
    3. G. Jeronimidis

    . 2006. Biomechanics of a branch–stem junction in softwood. Trees (Berlin) 20: 643–648.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Pfisterer, J.A.

    2003. Towards a better understanding of tree failure: Investigations into bending stresses of branch junction and stems of hazel (Corylus avellana L.) as a model organism. Mitteilungen-Biologischen Bundesanstalt fur Land und Forstwirtschaft 394: 272–279.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Putz, F.E.,
    2. P.D. Coley,
    3. K. Lu,
    4. A. Montalvo, and
    5. A. Aiello

    . 1983. Uprooting and snapping of trees: Structural determinants and ecological consequences. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13: 1011–1020.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.

    1985. How branches are attached to tree trunks. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 1391–1401.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Simpson, W., and
    2. A. TenWolde

    . 1999. Physical properties and moisture relations of wood. In: Wood Handbook—Wood as an Engineering Material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113. USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. 463 pp.
17. ↵
    1. Smiley, E.T.

    2003. Does included bark reduce the strength of codominant stems? Journal of Arboriculture 29: 104–106.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Smiley, E.T.,
    2. C.M. Greco, and
    3. J.G. Williams

    . 2000. Brace rods for codominant stems: Installation location and breaking strength. Journal of Arboriculture 26: 170–176.

    OpenUrl