Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Plant Species Richness on a Transmission Right-of-Way in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S. Using Integrated Vegetation Management

Richard H. Yahner, Richard T. Yahner and Bradley D. Ross
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 2008, 34 (4) 238-244; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2008.34.4.238
Richard H. Yahner
Richard H. Yahner (corresponding author), School of Forest Resources, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Richard T. Yahner
Richard T. Yahner, 202 Amblewood Way, State College, PA 16803, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradley D. Ross
Bradley D. Ross, 734 Partridge Lane, State College, PA 16801, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Green Lane Research and Demonstration Area, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, U.S., has been studied each year since 1987, making this 21-year-old project extremely valuable as a source of information on the effects of mechanical and herbicidal maintenance on flora and fauna along an electric transmission right-of-way (ROW). In this article, our objective was to document plant species richness among treatment units and in relation to wire and border zones on the ROW. We noted the presence of plant species from late May through mid-August in 2005 and 2006 and observed 114 vascular plant species in the ten treatment units; 35 (31%) of these species were exotic. Twenty-seven (24%) species were widespread on the ROW and seven of these (26%) were exotic. The total number of species per unit ranged from 46 (40%) species in handcut units to 57 (50%) in stem–foliage spray units. Of the total number of species, 103 (90%) and 81 (71%) occurred in wire and border zones, respectively. The number of exotic species was higher in wire zones (33 [29%]) than in border zones (22 [19%]).

Key Words
  • Exotic species
  • herbicides
  • integrated vegetation management
  • rights-of-way
  • southeastern Pennsylvania
  • species richness
  • tree control
  • vegetation

A major goal of the Green Lane 33 Research and Demonstration Project in southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S. since its establishment in 1987 has been to determine the use of Integrated Vegetation Management (IVM) for maintenance of an electric utility transmission right-of-way (ROW) (Bramble and Byrnes 1996; Yahner and Hutnik 2004a). The response of vegetation to IVM is important because plant communities can change within a relatively short time because of natural plant succession.

The IVM technique for vegetation involves two phases: 1) use of a herbicidal spray or mechanical treatment to initially control the density of target (undesirable) trees, i.e., those that have the potential of growing to a height that is not compatible with safe ROW maintenance; and 2) development of a tree-resistant plant cover type to reduce target tree invasion of the ROW (Bramble and Byrnes 1996; Yahner and Hutnik 2004a). The wire–border zone method was used on all treatment units of the Green Lane Research and Demonstration ROW to achieve this goal (Yahner and Hutnik 2004a, 2005; Ballard et al. 2007).

The Green Lane Research and Demonstration Area has been studied each year since 1987, making this 21-year-old project extremely valuable as a source of information on the effects of mechanical and herbicidal maintenance on flora and fauna along an electric transmission ROW (Yahner and Hutnik 2004a, 2004b). A desired objective of IVM on the Green Lane Research and Demonstration Area is to create a diversity of plant species, which in turn provides a diverse wildlife habitat (Yahner and Hutnik 2004a). On a broad scale, habitat diversity on the ROW is achieved by herbicidal and mechanical maintenance of treatment units through the wire–border zone method. However, on a smaller scale, plant species diversity also is achieved by the presence of different combinations of shrub, forb, and grass cover types.

In this article, our objective was to document plant species richness among treatment units and in relation to wire and border zones on the Green Lane Research and Demonstration ROW. Species richness is a simple, yet important, measurement of species diversity and is the total number of different species in a given area (Yahner 2000).

STUDY AREA AND METHODS

The study area consists of 10 units with two replicates of each of five treatments (mowing, mowing plus herbicide, stem–foliage spray, foliage spray, and handcutting) (Table 1) (see Yahner 2006 for details of treatments). The total area of the ROW is 5.43 ha. Each treatment unit is rectangular in shape, ranges from 0.38 to 2.47 ac (0.15 to 1.00 ha), and spans the width of the ROW. The western border zone (7 m wide) of the ROW is immediately adjacent to a ROW of Pennsylvania Power & Light Company (PP&L); thus, vegetation was measured only along eastern border zones (11.5 m [37.95 ft] wide). As part of the vegetation assessment of treatment units of plant species from late May through mid-August in both 2005 and 2006, presence of each plant species was noted relative to wire versus border zone in each treatment unit. We used correlation analyses to determine if either the total number of species or the number of exotic species was correlated with size of units (Sokal and Rohlf 1995).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Total number of plant species in wire zones, in border zones, and in either zone of ten treatment units at the Green Lane Research and Demonstration Area from late May through mid-August 2005 to 2006.z

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We observed 114 vascular plant species in 10 treatment units on the Green Lane Research and Demonstration ROW during 2005 to 2006 (Table 1; Appendix). This total number of species at Green Lane was less than the 125 species noted along a transmission ROW in central Pennsylvania (State Game Lands [SGL] 33), but the SGL 33 ROW consisted of 15 units (Yahner and Hutnik 2005).

Total number of species per unit at the Green Lane Research and Demonstration ROW ranged from 46 (40%) in handcut units to 57 (50%) in stem–foliage units (Table 1; Appendix). Only 27 (24%) of the total number of species were considered wide-spread (e.g., those found in 80% or more of the units), and seven of these (26%) were exotic. In comparison, 35 (31%) of the total number of species were exotic. This percentage of exotic species is considerably higher than that noted on the SGL 33 ROW (23%), which traverses a relatively pristine forested landscape (Yahner and Hutnik 2005), or that found in unfragmented forest stands in Wisconsin (20%) (Rooney et al. 2004). The Green Lane ROW traverses residential areas that have been human-impacted for decades; thus, the number of exotic species was expected to be high on the Green Lane ROW, like in a sector of Valley Forge National Historical Park (34%) in southeastern Pennsylvania (Cypher et al. 1986; see also Lundgren et al. 2004).

Of the total number of species, 103 (90%) and 81 (71%) were in wire and border zones, respectively (Appendix). In wire zones, number of species ranged from 34 (30%) in mowing plus herbicide units to 50 (44%) in stem–foliage units (Table 1). In border zones, number of species varied from 26 (23%) in hand-cut units to 36 (32%) in foliage–stem units. The number of exotic species ranged from 33 (29%) in wire zones to 22 (19%) in border zones (Appendix). The total number of species or number of exotic species were not correlated with size of units (r = 0.19 and 0.08, respectively; P > 0.90). Also, because exotic species were found throughout the ROW, the proximity to a road was not a factor in determining the current distribution of exotic species (Brothers and Spingarn 1992; Watkins et al. 2003; Yahner and Hutnik 2005).

Acknowledgments

Cooperators were Asplundh Expert Tree Company, Dow AgroSciences, and Philadelphia Electric Company.

APPENDIX

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Plant species (in phylogenetic order) noted in wire zones (W), in border zones (B), in both zones (WB), or absent (−) in ten treatment units on the Green Lane Research and Demonstration Area from late May through mid-August 2005 to 2006.z

  • © 2008, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Ballard, B.D.,
    2. K.T. McLoughlin, and
    3. C.A. Nowak
    . 2007. New diagrams and applications for the wire zone–border zone approach to vegetation management on electric transmission rights-of-way. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 33: 435–439.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Bramble, W.C., and
    2. W.R. Byrnes
    . 1996. Integrated vegetation management of an electric utility right-of-way ecosystem. Down to Earth 51: 29–34.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Brothers, T.S., and
    2. A. Spingarn
    . 1992. Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests. Conservation Biology 6: 91–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Cypher, E.A.,
    2. R.H. Yahner,
    3. G.L. Storm, and
    4. B.L. Cypher
    . 1986. Flora and fauna survey in a proposed recreational area of Valley Forge National Historical Park. Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences 60: 47–50.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Lundgren, M.R.,
    2. C.J. Small, and
    3. G.D. Dreyer
    . 2004. Influence of land use and site characteristics on invasive plant abundance in the Quinebaug Highlands of southern New England. Northeastern Naturalist 11: 313–322.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rhoades, A.F., and
    2. W.M. Klein Jr.
    . 1993. The Vascular Flora of Pennsylvania: Annotated Checklist and Atlas. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA. 636 pp.
  6. ↵
    1. Rooney, T.P.,
    2. S.M. Wiegmann,
    3. D.A. Rogers, and
    4. D.M. Waller
    . 2004. Biotic impoverishment and homogenization in unfragmented forest understory communities. Conservation Biology 18: 787–798.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Sokal, R.R., and
    2. F.J. Rohlf
    . 1995. Biometry: Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd Ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY. 887 pp.
  8. ↵
    1. Watkins, R.Z.,
    2. J. Chen,
    3. J. Pickens, and
    4. K.D. Brosofske
    . 2003. Effects of forest roads on understory plants in a managed forested landscape. Conservation Biology 17: 411–419.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.
    2000. Eastern Deciduous Forest: Ecology and Wildlife Conservation. 2nd Ed. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 295 pp.
  10. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.
    2006. Green Lane Research and Demonstration Project: 20 Years of Continuous Study. Annual Report to Cooperators. 36 pp.
  11. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H., and
    2. R.J. Hutnik
    . 2004a. Integrated vegetation management on an electric transmission right-of-way in Pennsylvania, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 30: 295–300.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H., and
    2. R.J. Hutnik
    . 2004b. State Game Lands 33 Research and Demonstration Project—52 Years of Continuous Study. Annual Report to Cooperators. 33 pp.
  13. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H., and
    2. R.J. Hutnik
    . 2005. Plant species richness on an electric transmission right-of-way using integrated vegetation management. Journal of Arboriculture 33: 124–130.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 34 (4)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 34, Issue 4
July 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Plant Species Richness on a Transmission Right-of-Way in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S. Using Integrated Vegetation Management
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Plant Species Richness on a Transmission Right-of-Way in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S. Using Integrated Vegetation Management
Richard H. Yahner, Richard T. Yahner, Bradley D. Ross
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2008, 34 (4) 238-244; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.34.4.238

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Plant Species Richness on a Transmission Right-of-Way in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S. Using Integrated Vegetation Management
Richard H. Yahner, Richard T. Yahner, Bradley D. Ross
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2008, 34 (4) 238-244; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.34.4.238
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • STUDY AREA AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • APPENDIX
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Exotic species
  • Herbicides
  • Integrated Vegetation Management
  • rights-of-way
  • southeastern Pennsylvania
  • species richness
  • tree control
  • vegetation

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire