Research ArticleArticles

The Potential of a Chlorophyll Content SPAD Meter to Quantify Nutrient Stress in Foliar Tissue of Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), English Oak (Quercus robur), and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica)

Glynn C. Percival, Ian P. Keary and Kelly Noviss
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 2008, 34 (2) 89-100; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2008.012

Abstract

The chlorophyll content (or SPAD meter) is a simple, portable diagnostic tool that measures the greenness or relative chlorophyll content of leaves. Compared with the traditional destructive methods of chlorophyll extraction, the use of this equipment saves time, space, and resources. The objective of this study was to establish a correlation between the leaf photosynthetic pigment content (chlorophylls, carotenoids) extracted in aqueous acetone, total leaf nitrogen (N) content, and chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm values with the SPAD-502 readings in sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), beech (Fagus sylvatica), and English oak (Quercus robur) leaves displaying visual symptoms of N deficiency. In addition, this study aimed to determine a critical foliar N content below which a reduction in photosynthetic efficiency occurs. Irrespective of species, high correlations were recorded between SPAD readings, total leaf chlorophyll and carotenoid content, foliar N content, and leaf photosynthetic efficiency as measured by chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm values; however, a poor correlation between SPAD values and total chlorophyll: carotenoid ratios was obtained. In the case of Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvatica, and Quercus robur, SPAD readings lower than 25 indicated impairment of leaf photosynthetic process that in turn were correlated with a foliar N content less than 1.5%, a value associated with a critical N deficiency. Results of this study indicate that the chlorophyll content SPAD-502 m potentially offers a useful nondestructive, handheld system to aid in the evaluation of tree health. However, users should be aware of the limitations of this system. Consistency in sample collection and seasonal timing may necessitate species and cultivar calibration equations to correlate SPAD values with reductions in tree vitality.

Key Words

Urban environments present an array of environmental factors hostile to the biology of trees (soil deoxygenation, compaction, aerial pollution, and deicing salts). These stresses limit the amount of carbohydrates available for growth and reduce nutrient uptake resulting in leaf chlorosis and necrosis (Jimenez et al. 1997; Mohammed et al. 1997; Maki and Colombo 2001). These symptoms become manifest as leaf yellowing that are visible indicators arborists interpret to assess tree vitality (Percival 2004). Visual observations can be very subjective because they are based on human knowledge and interpretation that can significantly differ between individuals (Percival 2004). Consequently, health evaluations can be markedly different between assessors. Field diagnostic tools are now required to objectively evaluate stress disorders in trees as a basis for management decisions on cultural practice and for proactive monitoring in urban treescapes (Loh et al. 2002). Such diagnostic instruments and methodologies should ideally detect stress before the visible symptoms of plant deterioration become manifest and therefore make possible effective remedial intervention (Percival and Fraser 2001).

Both biotic and abiotic stress factors affect the content and efficiency of leaf photosynthetic pigments and/or their reciprocal ratio (Bacci et al. 1998). For example, the assessment of leaf photosynthetic pigments is an important indicator of senescence because breakdown of leaf chlorophyll is associated with environmental stress (Brown et al. 1991). Likewise, the variation in total chlorophyll/carotenoids ratio has been used as a useful indicator of stress in plants because a rapid increase in total leaf carotenoid content is a recognized plant stress response (Hendry and Price 1993). Exact knowledge of foliar chlorophyll concentrations, i.e., “greenness,” consequently may provide a robust and accurate estimation of tree vitality. Traditional methods of extracting chlorophylls from leaves using chemical solvents such as acetone, dimethylsulfoxide, and methanol require laboratory conditions, are time-consuming, and involve destructive leaf analysis (Lichtenthaler and Wellburn 1983).

The chlorophyll content meter (or SPAD meter) is a commercially available portable piece of equipment that is used to measure greenness based on optical responses when a leaf is exposed to light that in turn is used to estimate foliar chlorophyll concentrations (Kariya et al. 1982). The meter makes instantaneous and nondestructive readings on a plant based on the quantification of light intensity (peak wavelength: approximately 650 nm: red light-emitting diode [LED]) absorbed by the tissue sample. A second peak (peak wavelength: approximately 940 nm: infrared LED) is emitted simultaneous with red LED to compensate for thickness of the leaf (Hoel 1998).

Past research has shown a close link between leaf chlorophyll concentration and leaf nitrogen (N) content in agricultural crops such as rice, maize, and wheat because the majority of leaf N is contained within the chlorophyll molecules (Peterson et al. 1993). Consequently, chlorophyll content meters are widely used to detect N deficiencies and subsequently improve N management within the agricultural industry (Peterson et al. 1993; Smeal and Zhang 1994; Balasubramanian et al. 2000). The use of a chlorophyll SPAD meter for monitoring the N status of woody plants under field conditions has received limited attention (Loh et al. 2002).

Several studies have shown that carotenoids are vitally important in protecting the leaf photosynthetic apparatus, especially photosystems I and II, against photoinhibition under prolonged environmental stress by interconversions among the xanthophyll molecules (Hall and Rao 1999; Ort 2001). In the xanthophyll cycle, violaxanthin goes through de-epoxidation to give rise to anteroxanthin and finally zeaxanthin that, together with a low pH within the photosynthetic membrane, facilitate the harmless dissipation of excess excitation energy directly within the light-harvesting chlorophyll antennae (Havaux 1988; Ramalho et al. 2000). Therefore, an indirect, nondestructive quantification of total leaf carotenoids will prove important for stress-related studies (Torres Netto et al. 2005).

Chlorophyll fluorescence, an indication of the fate of excitation energy in the leaf photosynthetic apparatus, has been used to provide a rapid and nondestructive diagnostic system of detecting and quantifying physiologic injury in tree leaves and needles (photosynthetic organs) under low temperatures, salinity, and water stress conditions (Sestak and Stiffel 1997; Percival and Fraser 2001; Percival and Sheriffs 2002; Percival and Henderson 2003). Little information associating fluorescence values as measures of damage to the leaf photosynthetic system and readings with a chlorophyll SPAD meter exist (Torres Netto et al. 2005). Association between SPAD and fluorescence can be important to determine SPAD values associated with reductions in leaf photosynthetic properties induced by nutrient deficiency-related disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Mature, fully expanded leaves near the top of the canopy (generally about the fourth leaf from the apex) of five sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), beech (Fagus sylvatica), and English oak (Quercus robur) displaying a range of visually different leaf colors indicating a range of chlorophyll concentrations were selected. In all cases, leaf tissue was collected and sampled in late June 3 months after leaf flush, a time when leaves show maximum photosynthetic performance (Kitao et al. 1998). All trees were located in commercial plantings at the University of Reading campus (51°43′ N, −1°08′ W). The sampled leaves were transported in insulated boxes sheltered from light and all material prepared within 2 hr of collection.

SPAD Readings

The mean of three readings from a portable Minolta chlorophyll meter SPAD-502 (Spectrum Technologies, Inc., Plainfield, IL, U.S.) was obtained for each leaf disc from individual leaves (10 leaves per tree) and pooled to obtain one SPAD measurement per disc. The leaf disc used to obtain a SPAD value provided sufficient tissue for total chlorophyll and carotenoid content as well as chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm quantification. In the case of total foliar N content, however, six leaf discs were required. Consequently, SPAD values for all six discs (60 leaves per tree) were pooled for statistical purposes when comparing SPAD measurements versus total leaf N content. SPAD values were measured at the midpoint of the leaf next to the main leaf vein. This position was selected because examination of the relationship between SPAD readings taken at different positions on a leaf concluded this position most closely correlated with total leaf N and protein content as well as plant yield (Hoel 1998). This position was also most convenient from a practical point of view (Hoel 1998).

Total Leaf Chlorophyll and Carotenoid Content

Quantification was obtained by measurement of absorbance at 663, 645, and 480 nm in a spectrophotometer (PU8800 Pye Unicam, Portsmouth, U.K.) after extraction with 80% v/v aqueous acetone. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total carotenoid concentrations were determined according to the equation of Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983).

Nitrogen Content Assessment

Six leaf discs per N analysis were thoroughly washed and then dried in a convection oven at 85°C (185°F) for 48 hr before grinding through a 0.5 mm (0.02 in) cyclone mill (Retsch, Middlesborough, U.K.). Each six discs were placed in specific groups according to the SPAD-502 reading ranges (0–10, 11–20, 21–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60). Samples were placed into 150 mL (4.5 fl oz) volumetric flasks and digested in 20 mL (0.6 fl oz) of 7:1 nitric/perchloric acid. After cooling, the solutions were brought to volume with deionized water and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy elemental analysis. Nutrient values were expressed as percent total leaf dry weight.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Fv/Fm Measurements

Chlorophyll fluorescence was determined on leaf discs using a dark-acclimated Handy Plant Efficiency Analyzer chlorophyll fluorometer (Hansatech Instruments, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, U.K.). The initial fluorescence (F0) and maximum fluorescence (Fm) were analyzed and quantum efficiency of open photosystem II centers–quantum yield (Fv/Fm) calculated. The leaf discs were previously adapted to the dark for 30 min so that all the centers of photosystem II (PSII) were at an open stage (all the primary acceptors oxidized) and energy dissipation through heat was minimal. The F0 was obtained with low-intensity light (less than 0.1 μmol/m−2/s−1) not to induce any effect in the fluorescence variable. The Fm was obtained by a continuous light excitation (at 2500 μmol/m2/s−1) provided by an array of six LEDs focused on the leaf surface to provide homogeneous irradiation over a 4 mm (0.16 in) diameter leaf surface. The fluorescence variable (Fv) was calculated from the difference between Fm and F0. The Fv and Fm values were used to obtain the Fv/Fm ratio.

Statistical Analysis

Correlation equations and coefficients of multiple determinations (r2) were calculated using the curve-fitting feature of Genstat V using quadratic polynomial, logarithmic, exponential growth or decay or simple linear models as appropriate according to which model gave the highest percentage variation, i.e., goodness of fit, accounted for.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

SPAD versus Total Chlorophyll

Figure 1 shows the relationships between SPAD readings and total leaf chlorophyll concentrations in three tree species. A polynomial quadratic mathematical model best fit the relationship between these parameters with R2 values ranging between 0.83 and 0.93. Similar relationships among total leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD readings have been established with other plant species (Yadava 1986; Marquard and Tipton 1987; Schaper and Chacko 1991). Traditional methods of extracting chlorophylls from leaves using chemical solvents require laboratory conditions and are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive. Results here, and those elsewhere, indicate a SPAD meter can be used to measure greenness based on optical responses when a leaf is exposed to light that in turn is used to accurately estimate foliar chlorophyll concentrations. The importance of this relationship may have many applications to arborists. Because leaf chlorophyll concentrations change in response to external factors such as light and after various pruning regimes, building removal, or constructions activities, quantifying chlorophyll concentrations may provide important information about tree growth and physiologic plasticity in response to changing environments (Larcher 1995; Richardson et al. 2002). The amount of solar radiation absorbed by a leaf is largely a function of the foliar concentrations of photosynthetic pigments. Low concentrations of chlorophyll can therefore directly limit photosynthetic potential and hence primary production (Filella et al. 1995). A SPAD meter is ideally suited for the arborist requiring minimal training in its use and no detailed scientific background knowledge. Analysis is rapid (1 to 2 sec per reading) allowing for many trees to be evaluated in a single day. Importantly, measurements are nondestructive and noninvasive allowing for periodic repetitive sampling (Loh et al. 2002; Richardson et al. 2002)

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Calibration curves for a SPAD-502 chlorophyll content meter versus total leaf chlorophyll (Chl) concentration in three tree species. Leaves were collected from mature trees in late June 3 months after leaf flush. FW = fresh weight. For regression equations and R2, see “Materials and Methods.”

SPAD versus Total Carotenoids

Quadratic polynomial (Acer pseudoplatanus) and logarithmic regression (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus robur) models were adequate in explaining the relationships between SPAD and total leaf carotenoids with R2 of 0.85, 0.84, and 0.82, respectively (Figure 2). Results show that an indirect carotenoid quantification can be obtained for SPAD values up to 50 using the SPAD-502 despite the 650 nm quantifying system that is the wavelength relevant to chlorophyll absorption (Torres Netto et al. 2005). These inferences can be obtained as a result of the direct relationship between the total chlorophyll and carotenoid concentration within leaves. In higher plants, carotenoids generally consist of 7% to 9% of total leaf photosynthetic pigments, consistent with values obtained in this study for all three tree species (Hall and Rao 1999; Lawlor 2001). The importance of a nondestructive means of quantifying carotenoid concentrations lies in the fact that an initial plant stress response is stomatal closure to conserve transpirational water loss. Such a response can be highly detrimental to the leaf photosynthetic system as a result of the prevention of light energy conversion into photochemical energy caused by low CO2 concentrations within the leaf tissue in turn resulting in the production of high-energy reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide and singlet oxygen (Lawlor 2001). Buildup of ROS results in oxidization damage to leaf membranes, i.e., chlorophyll bleaching and cellular membrane destruction. To minimize the effects of oxidative stress, plants have evolved an antioxidant system consisting of carotenoids that function as protective photooxidative pigments responsible for the quenching of these ROS (Kraus and Fletcher 1994). Because an increase in total leaf carotenoid content is a widely recognized plant stress response (Peñuelas and Filella 1998), quantification of total leaf content can provide indicators of plant responsiveness to stresses frequently encountered in urban and landscape environments (Strauss-Debenedetti and Bazzaz 1991; Hendry and Price 1993; Vieira 1996).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Calibration curves for a SPAD-502 chlorophyll content content meter versus total leaf carotenoid (Car) concentration in three tree species. Leaves were collected from mature trees in late June 3 months after leaf flush. FW = fresh weight. For regression equations and R2, see “Materials and Methods.”

SPAD versus Total Chlorophyll:Carotenoid Ratio

A poor relationship between the total leaf chlorophyll:carotenoid ratio was shown for all three species. Goodness of fit R2 values of 0.49 (Acer pseudoplatanus), 0.54 (Fagus sylvatica), and 0.13 (Quercus robur) were recorded using quadratic polynomial regression models (Figure 3). Contrary to this, the ratio between chlorophyll and carotenoids has been shown to be a sensitive marker distinguishing natural senescence, senescence resulting from environmental stresses (Buckland et al. 1991), drought, and photooxidative damage in plants (Seel et al. 1992; Hendry and Price 1993). The poor relationship recorded in this study may relate to the type of stress imposed. An adequate N supply is essential for the formation of chloroplast and carotenoid structure (Peoples et al. 1980). When N availability is low, both the leaf chlorophyll and carotenoid content are reduced (Doncheva et al. 2001). However, analysis of the ultrastructure of leaves indicated a more marked influence of N deficiency on leaf chlorophyll content compared with carotenoid content, which may account for this poor correlation (Peñuelas and Filella 1998; Doncheva et al. 2001). Results of this investigation therefore indicate that leaf chlorophyll:carotenoid ratios do not provide as robust a system of identifying stress disorders in trees caused by N deficiency compared with other plant vitality systems such as chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm values used in this investigation.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Calibration curves for a SPAD-502 chlorophyll content meter versus total leaf chlorophyll (Chl):carotenoid (Car) concentration in three tree species. Leaves were collected from mature trees in late June 3 months after leaf flush. FW = fresh weight. For regression equations and R2, see “Materials and Methods.”

SPAD versus Chlorophyll Fluorescence (Fv/Fm)

Leaf chlorophyll content is often well correlated with leaf photosynthetic rates (Evans 1983; Seeman et al. 1987). Correlations between SPAD values and Fv/Fm values as measures of photo-system II efficiency are limited. According to the quadratic fitted model, the maximum quantum efficiency of the photosystem II, indicated by the Fv/Fm ratio, started to fall at around a SPAD value of 25 (Figure 4) irrespective of species. Exceedingly high goodness of fit values (R2 greater than 0.94) were associated with these models. The Fv/Fm ratio is positively correlated to the PSII quantum yield and an indirect measurement of plant physiologic status (Kitajima and Butler 1975; Maxwell and Johnson 2001) for which values of 0.8 ± 0.05 correspond to highly efficient use of the excitation energy in photochemical processes (Björkman and Demmig 1987; Mohammed et al. 1995; Percival 2005). Consequently, results of this investigation indicate that SPAD readings around 25 appear to be the start of PSII impairment caused by N deficiency in the species used in this study. Past research by Percival (2004) and Maki and Colombo (2001) indicated Fv/Fm values of 0.6 below which trees were affected in terms of reduced survival, height growth, and foliar necrosis. Fv/Fm ratios of 0.6 were associated with SPAD values between 15 and 20 in this study. However, this study was conducted on three tree species at one stage during the growing season. Consequently, although preliminary results are promising, further work is needed to assess the applicability of SPAD values versus reductions in photosynthetic efficiency as measured by chlorophyll fluorescence for other ornamental tree species. An example of the dangers of extrapolating SPAD values from one plant species to another can be gauged by reference to work by Torres Netto et al. (2005), who concluded SPAD values less than 40 were correlated with reductions in photosynthetic efficiency as measured by Fv/Fm values, not 25 as reported in this study. Such a response indicates individual regression models need to be developed for differing species and cultivar.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Calibration curves for a SPAD-502 chlorophyll content meter versus leaf chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) as a measure of photosynthetic efficiency in three tree species. Leaves were collected from mature trees in late June 3 months after leaf flush. For regression equations and R2, see “Materials and Methods.”

SPAD versus Leaf Nitrogen Content

Nitrogen is one of the most important factors in plant growth physiology. It is related to leaf photosynthetic rate (Evans 1989), dark respiration (Anten et al. 2000), quantum yield (Hirose and Werger 1987), leaf extension (Gastal et al. 1992), mesophyll size (Körner 1989), leaf aging (Escudero and Mediavilla 2003), leaf lifespan (Hikosaka and Hirose 2000), and leaf chlorophyll concentration (Pons et al. 1994). Optimal correlations between total leaf N concentrations and SPAD values were obtained using quadratic (Acer pseudoplatanus, Quercus robur) and linear (Fagus sylvatica) regression models with higher SPAD values reflecting higher internal foliar N content (Figure 5). In rice leaves, Takebe and Yoneyama (1989) showed a strong linear relationship between SPAD readings and weight-based leaf N concentration that varied with crop growth stage and variety, mainly as a result of leaf thickness or specific leaf weight (Peng et al. 1995). The confounding effect of leaf thickness can be eliminated if foliar N concentration is expressed on a leaf area basis (Balasubramanian et al. 2000); however, when SPAD values are adjusted for this, the chlorophyll meter estimation is no longer as quick, simple, or nondestructive as the unadjusted SPAD value (Hoel 1998). Likewise, the SPAD-502 m has been shown to be accurate in predicting chlorophyll and N levels in maize (Zea mays) (Wood et al. 1992) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Follett et al. 1992). Results of this investigation demonstrated a high model fit between SPAD and total N content in the three test trees under field conditions. Plant N status is of interest to landscape managers, because foliar N content influences tree aesthetics, vigor, pests and disease susceptibility as well as ability to tolerate environmental stress. By using this tool, it may be possible to synchronize fertilizer N application with actual tree demand. Data from Cresswell and Weir (1997) indicate the percentage leaf N associated with woody plant health ranges between 1.7% and 2.5% with values less than 1.7% generally associated with a low foliar N content. Results of this study indicate the SPAD threshold or critical value indicating low foliar N (less than 1.7%) in the three trees used for test purposes ranges between 22 and 25. Consequently, results of this investigation indicate a SPAD value less than 22 as a level when N fertilization should start in these three tree species to prevent N-related deficiency problems. In the case of rice genotypes, a SPAD threshold value of 35 is generally recognized as a critical value (Peng et al. 1996). Whenever SPAD readings fall below the 35 critical value, the rice crop suffers from N deficiency, and yields will decline if N fertilizer is not applied. Differing SPAD values associated with N deficiency in rice and trees may relate to the fact that rice genotypes have over the past 100 years been bred and selected for high vigor and yields. To achieve these aims, high inputs of N fertilizers are required and as a result of these breeding programs, most rice genotypes are derived from a very narrow genetic base. Such criteria are rarely considered with amenity trees where aesthetics, shape, form, and size are more important criteria for selection (Percival and Hitchmough 1995). Consequently, amenity trees are not regarded as high N demanders in comparison to agricultural crops and a single tree genus can consist of many species with differing growth forms and leaf, flower, bark, and berry characteristics, i.e., differing tree genera contains a very broad genetic base for selection. In addition, Loh et al. (2002) warns of the difficulties in extending SPAD technology to detect nutrient levels, particularly N content in perennial plants. Issues of sampling protocol such as leaf physiologic age, position, sampling time, interactions with other mineral content, and complex source–sink relationships associated with perennial plants are likely sources of variability. These are all valid points supported by research by Peterson et al. (1993), Takebe and Yoneyama (1989), Turner and Jund (1994), and Peng et al. (1993). Consequently, extrapolating the SPAD value recorded in this investigation to other woody plants is not recommended.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Calibration curves for a SPAD-502 chlorophyll content meter versus total leaf nitrogen (N) concentration in three tree species. Leaves were collected from mature trees in late June 3 months after leaf flush. FW = fresh weight. For regression equations and R2, see “Materials and Methods.”

Chlorophyll Fluorescence (Fv/Fm) versus Leaf Nitrogen Content

Reductions in photosynthetic efficiency caused by N deficiency have been reported elsewhere, because the amount of light absorbed by a leaf is largely a function of leaf chlorophyll concentration (Evans 1989; Filella et al. 1995). Lower photosynthetic efficiency caused by lower foliar N content could be anticipated because the majority of leaf N is contained within the chlorophyll molecules (Peterson et al. 1993) that in turn act as the major cell of photosynthetic activity within higher plants (Lawlor 2001). Low chlorophyll concentrations limit photosynthesis and therefore tree growth. However, the minimal leaf N content required for functional photosynthetic efficiency in urban trees remains largely unknown. According to Cresswell and Weir (1997), the percentage leaf N associated with a standard required for tree health ranges between 1.7% and 2.5% to include species from the Betula, Fagus, Buxus, Abies, Fraxinus, Ilex, Juniperus, Larix, Pinus, and Picea genus. Values less than 1.7% are generally associated with a low foliar N content and values less than 1.5 associated with a critical deficiency; however, variation between species does exist. In agreement with the standards stipulated by Cresswell and Weir (1997), quadratic regression models ranging between 0.71 and 0.88 R2 values in all three tree species (Figure 6) indicate a foliar N content less than 1.5 is associated with reductions in Fv/Fm values of 0.8 (values associated with full photosynthetic functioning) (Björkman and Demmig 1987; Mohammed et al. 1995; Percival 2005). Foliar N content between 0.8% and 1.2% corresponds to Fv/Fm values of 0.6 which in turn relate to reduced survival and growth (Maki and Colombo 2001; Percival 2004). Results presented here are one of the first to quantify actual foliar N content with impairment of the leaf photosynthetic system and potential influence on future growth and survival.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Calibration curves of total leaf nitrogen (N) concentration versus leaf chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) as a measure of photosynthetic efficiency in three tree species. Leaves were collected from mature trees in late June 3 months after leaf flush. For regression equations and R2, see “Materials and Methods.”

In conclusion, results of this study indicate that the chlorophyll content SPAD meter potentially offers a useful nondestructive, handheld system to aid in the evaluation of tree health. High correlations were obtained among SPAD readings, total leaf chlorophyll and carotenoid content, foliar N content, and leaf photosynthetic efficiency as measured by chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm values. A lower correlation between SPAD values and total chlorophyll/carotenoid content were obtained. In the case of Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvatica, and Quercus robur, SPAD readings lower than 25 indicated impairment of the leaf photosynthetic process. However, critical chlorophyll meter values indicating reductions in tree vitality may vary among species and among cultivars within the same species (Hoel 1998). Likewise, the chlorophyll content of a leaf varies with age. Consequently, consistency in sample collection and seasonal timing may be necessary to develop species and cultivar calibration to correlate SPAD values with reductions in tree vitality (Hoel 1998).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for funding in part from the TREE Fund (John Z. Duling Grant).

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Anten, N.P.R.,
    2. K. Hikosaka, and
    3. T. Hirose
    . 2000. Leaf Development and Canopy Growth. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK. pp. 171–203.
  2. ↵
    1. Bacci, L.,
    2. M. De. Vincenzi,
    3. B. Rapi,
    4. B. Arca, and
    5. F. Benincasa
    . 1998. Two methods for the analysis of colorimetric components applied to plant stress monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 19: 167–186.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Balasubramanian, V.,
    2. A.C. Morales,
    3. R.T. Cruz,
    4. T.M. Thiyagarajan,
    5. R. Nagarajan,
    6. M. Babu,
    7. S. Abdulrachman, and
    8. L.H. Hai
    . 2000. Adaptation of the chlorophyll meter (SPAD) technology for real-time N management in rice: A review. International Rice Research Institute 5: 25–26.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Björkman, O., and
    2. B. Demmig
    . 1987. Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170: 489–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Scheer, H.
    1. Brown, S.B.,
    2. J.D. Houghton, and
    3. G.A.F. Hendry
    . 1991. Chlorophyll breakdown, pp. 465–489. In Scheer, H. (Ed.). Chlorophylls. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  6. ↵
    1. Buckland, S.M.,
    2. A.H. Price, and
    3. G.A.F. Hendry
    . 1991. The role of ascorbate in drought-treated Cochlearia atlantica Pobed. and Armeria maritime (Mill.) Willd. The New Phytologist 119: 155–160.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Cresswell, G.C., and
    2. R.G. Weir
    . 1997. Plant Nutrient Disorders—Ornamental Plants and Shrubs. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia. pp. 132–221.
  8. ↵
    1. Doncheva, S.,
    2. V. Vassileva,
    3. G. Ignatov,
    4. S. Pandev,
    5. R. Dris, and
    6. R. Niskanen
    . 2001. Nitrogen deficiency, photosynthesis and chloroplasts of pepper plants. Agriculture and Food Science in Finland 10: 59–64.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Escudero, A., and
    2. S. Mediavilla
    . 2003. Decline in photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency with leaf age and nitrogen, resorption as determinants of leaf life span. Journal of Ecology 91: 880–889.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Evans, J.R.
    1983. Nitrogen and photosynthesis in the flag leaf of wheat. Plant Phvsiology. 72: 297–302.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Evans, J.R.
    1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78: 9–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Filella, I.,
    2. L. Serrano,
    3. J. Serra, and
    4. J. Peñuelas
    . 1995. Evaluating wheat nitrogen status with canopy reflectance indices and discriminant analysis. Crop Science 35: 1400–1405.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Follett, R.H.,
    2. R.E. Follett, and
    3. A.D. Halvorson
    . 1992. Use of chlorophyll meter to evaluate the nitrogen status of dry land winter wheat. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 23: 687–697.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Gastal, F.,
    2. G. Belanger, and
    3. G. Lemaire
    . 1992. A model of the leaf extension rate of tall fescue in response to nitrogen and temperature. Annals of Botany 70: 437–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Hall, D.O., and
    2. K.K. Rao
    . 1999. Photosynthesis. 6th Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. pp. 174–180.
  16. ↵
    1. Havaux, M.
    1988. Carotenoids as membrane stabilizers in chloroplasts. Trends in Plant Science 4: 147–151.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Hendry, G.A.F., and
    2. J.P. Grime
    1. Hendry, G.A.F., and
    2. A.H. Price
    . 1993. Stress indicators: Chlorophylls and carotenoids, pp. 148–152. In Hendry, G.A.F., and J.P. Grime (Eds.). Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.
  18. ↵
    1. Hikosaka, K., and
    2. T. Hirose
    . 2000. Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in species coexisting in a warm-temperate evergreen forest. Tree Physiology 20: 1249–1254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Hirose, T., and
    2. M.J.A. Werger
    . 1987. Nitrogen use efficiency in instantaneous and daily photosynthesis of leaves in the canopy of a Solidago altissima stand. Physiologia Plantarum 70: 215–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Hoel, B.O.
    1998. Use of a hand held chlorophyll meter in winter wheat: Evaluation of different measuring positions on the leaves. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 48: 222–228.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Jimenez, M.S.,
    2. A.M. Gonzalez-Rodriguez,
    3. D. Morales,
    4. M.C. Cid,
    5. A.R. Socorro, and
    6. M. Caballero
    . 1997. Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for salt stress detection in roses. Photosynthetica 33: 291–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Kariya, K.,
    2. A. Matsuzaki, and
    3. H. Machida
    . 1982. Distribution of chlorophyll content in leaf blade of rice plant. Nihon Sakumotsu Gakkai Kiji 51: 134–135.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Kitajima, M., and
    2. W.L. Butler
    . 1975. Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and primary photochemistry in chloroplasts by dibromothymoquinone. Biochemistry Biophysical Acta 723: 169–175.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Kitao, M.,
    2. T.T. Lei, and
    3. T. Koike
    . 1998. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence to evaluate Mn tolerance of deciduous broad-leaved tree seedlings native to northern Japan. Tree Physiology 18: 135–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Körner, C.
    1989. The nutritional status of plants from high altitudes: A worldwide comparison. Oecologia 81: 379–391.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Kraus, T.E., and
    2. R.A. Fletcher
    . 1994. Paclobutrazol protects wheat seedlings from heat and paraquat injury. Is detoxification of active oxygen involved? Plant & Cell Physiology 35: 45–52.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Larcher, W.
    1995. Physiological Plant Ecology. 3rd Edition. Springer, London, U.K.
  28. ↵
    1. Lawlor, D.W.
    2001. Photosynthesis. 3rd Edition. Scientific Publishers Limited, Oxford, U.K.
  29. ↵
    1. Lichtenthaler, H.K., and
    2. A.R. Wellburn
    . 1983. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transmycological 11: 591–593.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Loh, F.C.W.,
    2. J.C. Grabosky, and
    3. N.L. Bassuk
    . 2002. Using the SPAD 502 meter to assess chlorophyll and nitrogen content of benjamin fig and cottonwood leaves. HortTechnology 12: 682–686.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Maki, D.S., and
    2. S.J. Colombo
    . 2001. Early detection of the effects of warm storage on conifer seedlings using physiological tests. Forest Ecology and Management 154: 237–249.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Marquard, R.D., and
    2. J.L. Tipton
    . 1987. Relationship between extractable chlorophyll and an in situ method to estimate leaf greenness. HortScience 22: 1327–1329.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Maxwell, K., and
    2. G.N. Johnson
    . 2001. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 659–668.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Mohammed, G.H.,
    2. W.D. Binder, and
    3. L. Gillies
    . 1995. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A review of its practical forestry applications and instrumentation. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 10: 383–410.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Mohammed, G.H.,
    2. T.L. Noland,
    3. W.C. Parker, and
    4. R.G. Wagner
    . 1997. Pre-planting physiological stress assessment to forecast field growth performance of jack pine and black spruce. Forest Ecology and Management 92: 107–117.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Ort, D.
    2001. When there is too much light. Plant Physiology 125: 29–32.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Peng, S.,
    2. F.C. Garcia,
    3. R.C. Laza, and
    4. K.G. Cassman
    . 1993. Adjustment for specific leaf weight improves chlorophyll meter’s estimation of rice leaf nitrogen concentration. Agronomy Journal 85: 987–990.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Peng, S.,
    2. F.C. Garcia,
    3. R.C. Laza,
    4. A.L. Sanico,
    5. R.M. Visperas, and
    6. K.G. Cassman
    . 1996. Increased N-use efficiency using a chlorophyll meter on high-yielding irrigated rice. Field Crops Research 47: 243–252.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Peng, S.,
    2. R.C. Laza,
    3. F.C. Garcia, and
    4. K.G. Cassman
    . 1995. Chlorophyll meter estimates leaf area-based N concentration of rice. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26: 927–935.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Peñuelas, J., and
    2. I. Filella
    . 1998. Visible and near-infrared reflectance techniques for diagnosing plant physiological status. Trends in Plant Science 3: 151–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Peoples, M.B.,
    2. V.C. Beilharz,
    3. S.P. Waters,
    4. R.G. Simpson, and
    5. M.J. Dalling
    . 1980. Nitrogen redistribution during grain growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Chloroplast senescence and the degradation of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase. Planta 149: 241–251.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Percival, G.C.
    2004. Evaluation of physiological tests as predictors of young tree establishment and growth. Journal of Arboriculture 30: 80–92.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Percival, G.C.
    2005. Identification of foliar salt tolerance of woody perennials using chlorophyll fluorescence. HortScience 40: 1892–1897.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Percival, G.C., and
    2. G.A. Fraser
    . 2001. Measurement of the salinity and freezing tolerance of Crataegus genotypes using chlorophyll fluorescence. Journal of Arboriculture 27: 233–245.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Percival, G.C., and
    2. A. Henderson
    . 2003. An assessment of the freezing tolerance of urban trees using chlorophyll fluorescence. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 78: 254–260.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Percival, G.C., and
    2. J. Hitchmough
    . 1995. Tree establishment and performance in a cool growing season arboretum. Arboricultural Journal 19: 357–371.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Percival, G.C., and
    2. C. Sheriffs
    . 2002. Identification of drought tolerant woody perennials using chlorophyll fluorescence. Journal of Arboriculture 28: 215–224.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Peterson, T.A.,
    2. T.M. Blackmer,
    3. D.D. Francis, and
    4. J.S. Scheppers
    . 1993. Using a Chlorophyll Meter to Improve N Management. A Webguide in Soil Resource Management: D-13, Fertility. Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
  49. ↵
    1. Roy, J., and
    2. E. Garnier
    1. Pons, T.L.,
    2. A. Van Der Werf, and
    3. H. Lambers
    . 1994. A whole plant perspective on carbon–nitrogen interactions, pp. 61–77. In Roy, J., and E. Garnier (Eds.). A Whole Plant Perspective on Carbon–Nitrogen Interactions. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  50. ↵
    1. Ramalho, J.C.,
    2. T.L. Pons,
    3. H.W. Groeneveld,
    4. H.G. Azinheira, and
    5. M.A. Nunes
    . 2000. Photosynthetic acclimation of high light conditions in mature leaves of Coffea arabica L.: Role of xanthophylls, quenching mechanisms and nitrogen nutrition. Austrian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 43–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. Richardson, A.D.,
    2. P. Shane,
    3. G. Duigan, and
    4. P. Berlyn
    . 2002. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. The New Phytologist 153: 185–194.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Schaper, H., and
    2. E.K. Chacko
    . 1991. Relation between extractable chlorophyll and portable chlorophyll meter readings in leaves of eight tropical and subtropical fruit-tree species. Journal of Plant Physiology 138: 674–677.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Seel, W.E.,
    2. G.A.F. Hendry, and
    3. J.A. Lee
    . 1992. The combined effect of desiccation and irradiance on mosses from xeric and hydric habitats. Journal of Experimental Botany 43: 1023–1030.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Seeman, J.R.,
    2. T.D. Sharkey,
    3. J. Wang, and
    4. C.B. Osmond
    . 1987. Environmental effects on photosynthesis, nitrogen-use efficiency, and metabolic pools in leaves of sun and shade plants. Plant Physiology 84: 796–802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Sestak, Z., and
    2. P. Stiffel
    . 1997. Leaf age related differences in chlorophyll fluorescence. Photosynthetica 33: 347–369.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Smeal, D., and
    2. H. Zhang
    . 1994. Chlorophyll meter evaluation for nitrogen management in corn. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 25: 1495–1503.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Strauss-Debenedetti, S., and
    2. F.A. Bazzaz
    . 1991. Plasticity acclimation to light in tropical Moraceae of different successional positions. Oecologia 87: 377–387.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Takebe, M., and
    2. T. Yoneyama
    . 1989. Measurement of leaf color scores and its implication to nitrogen nutrition of rice plants. Japanese Agricultural Research. 23: 86–93.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Torres Netto, A.,
    2. E. Campostrini,
    3. J.G. DeOliviera, and
    4. R.E. Bressan-Smith
    . 2005. Photosynthetic pigments, nitrogen, chlorophyll a fluorescence and SPAD-502 readings in coffee leaves. Scientia Horticulturae 104: 199–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    1. Turner, F.T., and
    2. M.F. Jund
    . 1994. Assessing the nitrogen requirements of rice crops with a chlorophyll meter. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34: 1001–1005.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Vieira, G.
    1996. Gap Dynamics in Managed Amazonian Forest: Structural and Ecophysiological Aspects. University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K. 162 pp.
  62. ↵
    1. Wood, C.W.,
    2. D.W. Reeves,
    3. R.R. Duffield, and
    4. K.L. Edmisten
    . 1992. Field chlorophyll measurements for corn nitrogen status. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15: 487–501.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Yadava, U.L.
    1986. A rapid and non destructive method to determine chlorophyll on intact leaves. HortScience 21: 1449–1450.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
The Potential of a Chlorophyll Content SPAD Meter to Quantify Nutrient Stress in Foliar Tissue of Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), English Oak (Quercus robur), and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica)
Glynn C. Percival, Ian P. Keary, Kelly Noviss
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2008, 34 (2) 89-100; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2008.012
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords