Attitudes of Residents Toward Street Trees on Four Streets in Toledo, Ohio, U.S. Before Removal of Ash Trees (Fraxinus spp.) from Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis)

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Akiyama, K., and
   2. S. Ohmomo

   . 2000. The Buprestid Beetles of the World. Iconographic Series of Insects 4. Gekkan-Mushi Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. 341 pp.
2. ↵
   1. Bonnes, M.,
   2. G. Carrus,
   3. M. Bonaiuto,
   4. F. Fornara, and
   5. P. Passafaro

   . 2004. Inhabitant’s environmental perceptions in the city of Rome within the framework for urban biosphere reserves of the UNESCO Programme on Man and Biosphere. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1023: 175–186.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Cappaert, D.,
   2. D.G. McCullough,
   3. T.M. Poland, and
   4. N.W. Siegert

   . 2005. Emerald ash borer in North America: A research and regulatory challenge. American Entomologist 51: 152–163.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Cheng, S., and
   2. J. McBride

   . 2006. Restoration of the urban forests of Tokyo and Hiroshima following World War II. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 5: 155–168.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Fraser, E.D., and
   2. W.A. Kenney

   . 2000. Cultural background and landscape history as factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 26: 107–113.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Herms, D.A.,
   2. D.G. McCullough, and
   3. D.R. Smitley

   . 2004. Under attack: The current status of the emerald ash borer infestation and the program to eradicate it. American Nurseryman 200: 20–27.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Hitchmough, J.D., and
   2. A.M. Bonugli

   . 1997. Attitudes of a medium sized town in south west Scotland to street trees. Landscape Research 22: 327–337.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Iverson, L.,
   2. A. Prasad,
   3. J. Bossenbroek,
   4. D. Sydnor, and
   5. E. Schwartz

   . 2006. Modeling potential movements of the emerald ash borer in Ohio and Michigan. Proceedings of the 2006 Society of American Foresters National Convention.
9. ↵
   1. Johnston, M., and
   2. L. Shimada

   . 2004. Urban forestry in a multicultural society. Journal of Arboriculture 30: 185–191.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Kalmbach, K.L., and
    2. J.J. Kielbaso

    . 1979. Resident attitudes toward selected characteristics of street tree plantings. Journal of Arboriculture 5: 124–129.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Kuo, F.E.

    2001. Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior 33: 5–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Martin, C.A.,
    2. P. Warren, and
    3. A. Kinzig

    . 2004. Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks in Phoenix, AZ. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 355–368.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.

    2005. Trees with benefits. American Nurseryman 201: 34–40.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Poland, T.M., and
    2. D.G. McCullough

    . 2006. Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. Journal of Forestry 104: 118–124.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.,
    2. J. Flannigan, and
    3. R. Coles

    . 2006. Residents’ attitudes toward street trees in the U.K. and U.S. communities. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 32: 236–246.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W., and
    2. W.N. Cannon Jr.

    . 1983. The esthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio towns. Journal of Arboriculture 9: 237–243.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W., and
    2. S.R. Ruffolo

    . 1996. Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb. Journal of Arboriculture 22: 35–43.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Sommer, R.,
    2. P.A. Barker,
    3. H. Guenther, and
    4. K. Kurani

    . 1989. Householder evaluation of two street tree species. Journal of Arboriculture 15: 99–103.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D.,
    2. M. Bumgardner, and
    3. A. Todd

    . 2007. The potential impacts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) on Ohio, U.S., communities. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 33: 48–54.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service

    . 2003. Emerald ash borer; quarantine and regulations. Federal Register 66: 59082–59091.

    OpenUrl