Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleResearch Note

Populations of Small Mammals on an Electric Transmission Line Area in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S.

Richard H. Yahner and Richard T. Yahner
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2007, 33 (6) 433-434; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2007.050
Richard H. Yahner
Richard H. Yahner (corresponding author), School of Forest Resources, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Richard T. Yahner
Richard T. Yahner, 202 Amblewood Way, State College, PA 16803, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The Green Lane Research and Demonstration Project has had three objectives since 1987: to determine the effectiveness of mechanical and herbicidal maintenance treatments on control of undesirable trees, development of tree-resistant plant cover types, and wildlife and species of high public interest (Yahner and Hutnik 2005). The wire-border zone method of vegetation management was implemented on the electrical transmission line area (hereafter, right of way [ROW]) in 1987 (Yahner and Hutnik 2004, 2005), producing a tree-resistant forb–shrub–grass cover type in wire zones and a tall shrub cover type in border zones.

Small mammals are important wildlife species by consuming tree seeds (Bramble et al. 1992), thereby reducing invasion of undesirable tree species on a ROW (Yahner et al. 2007). Small mammals also serve as prey for a variety of predators (Merritt 1987). In a previous study conducted in 1989 through 1990 (Bramble et al. 1992) and 2004 through 2005 (Yahner et al. 2007), at least seven species of small mammals were noted on the State Game Lands (SGL) 33 ROW in Center County, Pennsylvania, U.S.; long-term studies of small mammals on a ROW are virtually nonexistent. Our objectives were to determine relative abundance and species richness (number of species) in four cover types along the ROW, resulting from herbicidal and mechanical maintenance of the vegetation, and in the adjacent forest.

STUDY AREA AND METHODS

Listen

Treatments on the ROW consisted of two units each of hand-cut, mowing, mowing plus herbicide, stem–foliage spray, and foliage spray. Five cover types were selected for study: adjacent forest (serving as a reference), tree sprout, shrub, shrub–forb, and grass. Major trees in forest cover type included red maple (Acer rubrum), white ash (Fraxinus americana), hickory (Carya spp.), and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Tree sprout was in the wire zone of a handcut unit; stumps were primarily white ash, and other plants included multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), and grass (Panicum spp.). Shrub was in the border zone of a mowing plus herbicide unit; principal shrubs were Japanese honeysuckle, blackberry, dewberry (R. hispidus), and poison ivy. Shrub–forb was well developed in the wire zone of a stem–foliage unit; vegetation consisted principally of dewberry, Japanese honeysuckle, blackberry, goldenrod, and grass. Grass (mainly fall panic grass [Panicum spp.]) was in wire zones, with some common sow-thistle (Sonchus oleraceus) and mile-a-minute (Polygonum perfoliatum).

Mammals were surveyed monthly (May through November 2005, May through October 2006, by placing six metal live traps in a 2×3 grid in a 10 × 15 m (33 × 49.5 ft) area per cover type (after Yahner 1988). Cotton was used as bedding, and a small amount of peanut butter was put in each trap as bait just before dusk. Traps were checked on two consecutive mornings. Number of individuals trapped per species, date of capture, and location of capture relative to cover types were noted for each survey (Smith and Vrieze 1979; Yahner 1983). Sex and age (if known), reproductive condition, and individual identification (e.g., ear tag or toe clip) were recorded (Rose and Dueser 1980).

Because vegetative was sparse in the grass cover type each year, traps in this type were not set until August. Also, in September 2006, trapping was not conducted because of heavy rains caused by hurricane conditions. Small mammals were sampled a total of 342 trap nights (TN) in 2005 and 276 TN in 2006.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Listen

Thirty-one small mammals (27 white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus; three northern short-tailed shrews, Blarina brevicauda; one meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus) were noted in 2005 and 2006. This included 19 in 2005 and 12 in 2006, which attests to the value of conducting a study on fauna for more than 1 year. The number of individuals noted at the Green Lane ROW and adjacent forest was much lower than 121 individuals (eight species) trapped at the SGL 33 area in 2004 and 2005. The capture rate was 5.2 individuals/100 TN in both years combined in the current study. This was considerably lower than 27.0 individuals/100 TN noted in 1989 through 1990 or 10.3 animals captured/100 TN in 2004 through 2005 at the SGL 33 area (Bramble et al. 1992; Yahner et al. 2007).

Most individuals (n = 13) of all species combined were in the shrub cover type, which represented a well-vegetated border zone created by integrated vegetation management (Bramble et al. 1985; Yahner and Hutnik 2004). The relative lack of mammals at the Green Lane area is not surprising based on other studies (e.g., Beer 1961; Yahner et al. 2007). As plant succession progresses, meadow voles would be expected in the grass cover type because it is a grassland specialist (Grant 1971).

In spring, abundance of small mammals was low at the Green Lane area (after Yahner 1983; Merritt 1987; Yahner et al. 2007). As the year progressed, reproduction and food resources increased, thereby resulting in more mammals captured. Reproductive adults occurred in May, and juvenile white-footed mice were captured in August.

We have no explanation for lowered diversity and abundance of small mammals at the Green Lane area compared with the SGL 33 area, except that land uses proximal to each ROW were dramatically different. For instance, land uses surrounding the Green Lane area were early successional areas, not unlike that found on the Green Lane ROW. In contrast, land use proximal to the ROW at the SGL 33 area was contiguous forest (Yahner et al. 2007), and the ROW represented an early successional habitat amid a forested landscape.

Herbicides were used for vegetation maintenance on the ROW at both areas (Yahner 2006). These chemicals had no long-term impact on other fauna or their food resources (Bramble et al. 1999; Yahner et al. 2003).

Acknowledgments

Listen

Cooperation was provided by Asplundh Tree Expert Co., Commonwealth Edison, Dow AgroSciences, and Philadelphia Electric Company.

  • © 2007, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

LITERATURE CITED

Listen
  1. ↵
    1. Beer, J.R.
    1961. Winter home ranges of the red-backed mouse and the deer mouse. Journal of Mammalogy 42: 174–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Bramble, W.C.,
    2. W.R. Byrnes, and
    3. R.J. Hutnik
    . 1985. Effects of a special technique for right-of-way maintenance on deer habitat. Journal of Arboriculture 11: 278–284.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Bramble, W.C.,
    2. R.H. Yahner, and
    3. W.R. Byrnes
    . 1999. Effect of herbicide maintenance of an electric transmission line right-of-way on butterfly populations. Journal of Arboriculture 25: 302–310.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bramble, W.C.,
    2. R.H. Yahner,
    3. W.R. Byrnes, and
    4. S.A. Liscinsky
    . 1992. Small mammals in plant cover types on an electric transmission right-of-way. Journal of Arboriculture 18: 316–321.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Grant, P.R.
    1971. The habitat preference of Microtus pennsylvanicus and its relevance to the distribution of this species on an island. Journal of Mammalogy 52: 351–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Merritt, J.D.
    1987. Guide to the Mammals of Pennsylvania. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA. 408 pp.
  7. ↵
    1. Rose, R.K., and
    2. R.D. Dueser
    . 1980. Lifespan of Virginia meadow voles. Journal of Mammalogy 61: 760–763.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Smith, A.T., and
    2. J.M. Vrieze
    . 1979. Population structure of Everglade rodents: Responses to a patchy environment. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 778–794.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.
    1983. Small mammals in farmstead shelterbelts: Habitat correlates of seasonal abundance and community structure. The Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 74–84.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.
    1988. Small mammals associated with even-aged aspen and mixed-oak forest stands in central Pennsylvania. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 62: 122–126.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.
    2006. Wildlife habitat, herbicides, and rights-of-way maintenance—integrated vegetation management and the wire-border zone method. Natural Areas Journal 26: 114–115.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H., and
    2. R.J. Hutnik
    . 2004. Integrated vegetation management on an electric transmission right-of-way in Pennsylvania, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 30: 295–300.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H., and
    2. R.J. Hutnik
    . 2005. A 15-year follow-up to vegetation on an electric transmission right-of-way in southeastern Pennsylvania. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 79: 72–74.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.,
    2. R.J. Hutnik, and
    3. S.A. Liscinsky
    . 2003. Long-term trends in bird populations on an electric transmission right-of-way. Journal of Arboriculture 29: 156–164.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.,
    2. R.T. Yahner, and
    3. R.J. Hutnik
    . 2007. Long-term trends in small mammals on a right-of-way in Pennsylvania. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry. 33: 147–152.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 33 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 33, Issue 6
November 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Populations of Small Mammals on an Electric Transmission Line Area in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Populations of Small Mammals on an Electric Transmission Line Area in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S.
Richard H. Yahner, Richard T. Yahner
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2007, 33 (6) 433-434; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2007.050

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Populations of Small Mammals on an Electric Transmission Line Area in Southeastern Pennsylvania, U.S.
Richard H. Yahner, Richard T. Yahner
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2007, 33 (6) 433-434; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2007.050
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • STUDY AREA AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Sixth- and Tenth-Year Growth Measurements for Three Tree Species in a Load-Bearing Stone–Soil Blend Under Pavement and a Tree Lawn in Brooklyn, New York, U.S.
  • Growth of Balled-and-Burlapped versus Bare-Root Trees in Oklahoma, U.S.
  • New Diagrams and Applications for the Wire Zone–Border Zone Approach to Vegetation Management on Electric Transmission Line Rights-of-Way
Show more Research Note

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire