Oxygen Production by Urban Trees in the United States

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. American Forests

   . 2006. American Forests Kicks Off the Holiday Season With Tips on How to Care for Your Christmas Trees. http://www.americanforests.org/news/display.php?id=125 (accessed 6/06).
2. ↵
   1. Broecker, W.S.

   1970. Man’s oxygen reserve. Science 168: 1537–1538.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
3. ↵
   1. Broecker, W.S.

   1996. Et tu, O₂? 21stC, The World of Research at Columbia University. Special Issue: Biospheres. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.1/broecker.htm (accessed 6/06).
4. ↵
   1. Cairns, M.A.,
   2. S. Brown,
   3. E.H. Helmer, and
   4. G.A. Baumgardner

   . 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111: 1–11.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Cardelino, C.A., and
   2. W.L. Chameides

   . 1990. Natural hydrocarbons, urbanization, and urban ozone. Journal of Geophysical Research 95: 13971–13979.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. deVries, R.E.

   1987. A preliminary investigation of the growth and longevity of trees in Central Park. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University, MS thesis.
7. ↵
   1. Encyclopaedia Britannica

   . 1994. Oxygen, p. 35. Volume 9. The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Fleming, L.E.

   1988. Growth estimation of street trees in central New Jersey. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University. MS thesis.
9. 1. Kenney, W.A., and
   2. Associates

   . 2001. The Role of Urban Forests in Greenhouse Gas Reduction. W.A. Kenney and Associates, ON ENV (99) 4691, Toronto, Canada. 202 pp.
10. ↵
    1. Miller, G.T.

    1979. Living in the Environment. Wadsworth Publ. Co., Belmont, CA. p. 91.
11. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.

    1986. Silvics of an urban tree species: Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.). Syracuse, NY, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, MS thesis.
12. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. Nowak, D.J., and
    3. Rowntree, R.A.

    1. Nowak, D.J.

    1994. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest, pp. 83–94. In Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. McPherson, E.G., Nowak, D.J., and Rowntree, R.A., Eds. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186, Radnor, PA.
13. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.

    2005. Strategic tree planting as an EPA encouraged pollutant reduction strategy: How urban trees can obtain credit in State Implementation Plans. Sylvan Communities. Summer/Fall: 23–27.
14. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. K.L. Civerolo,
    3. S.T. Rao,
    4. G. Sistla,
    5. C.J. Luley, and
    6. D.E. Crane

    . 2000. A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmospheric Environment 34: 1610–1613.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Hansen, M., and
    2. Burk, T.

    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. D.E. Crane

    . 2000. The urban forest effects (UFORE) model: Quantifying urban forest structure and functions, pp. 714–720. In Proceedings: Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century. Hansen, M., and Burk, T., Eds. IUFRO Conference, 16–20 August 1998, Boise, ID. General Technical Report NC-212, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN.
16. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. D.E. Crane

    . 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 116: 381–389.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane, and
    3. J.C. Stevens

    . 2006a. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4: 115–123.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane,
    3. J.C. Stevens, and
    4. R. Hoehn

    . 2005. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: Field Data Collection Procedures. USDA Forest Service, Syracuse, NY. http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/syracuse/Tools/downloads/UFORE_Manual.pdf (accessed 3/07).
19. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane,
    3. J.C. Stevens, and
    4. M. Ibarra

    . 2002a. Brooklyn’s Urban Forest. General Technical Report NE-290, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. 107 pp.
20. ↵
    1. Kuser, J.

    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. J.F. Dwyer

    . 2007. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems, pp. 25–46. In Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast. Kuser, J., Ed. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, NY.
21. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. R. Hoehn,
    3. D.E. Crane,
    4. J.C. Stevens, and
    5. J.T. Walton

    . 2006b. Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values: Minneapolis’ Urban Forest. Resource Bulletin NE-166. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. 20 pp.
22. 1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. R. Hoehn,
    3. D.E. Crane,
    4. J.C. Stevens, and
    5. J.T. Walton

    . 2006c. Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values: Washington DC’s Urban Forest. Resource Bulletin NRS-1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. 24 pp.
23. 1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. P. O’Connor

    . 2001. Syracuse Urban Forest Master Plan: Guiding the City’s Forest Resource in the 21st Century. General Technical Report NE-287. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. 50 pp.
24. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. J.C. Stevens,
    3. S.M. Sisinni, and
    4. C.J. Luley

    . 2002b. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture 28: 113–122.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Perry, J., and
    2. M.D. LeVan

    . c. 2003. Air Purification in Closed Environments: Overview of Spacecraft Systems. U.S. Army Natrick Soldier Center. http://nsc.natick.army.mil/jocotas/ColPro_Papers/Perry-LeVan.pdf (accessed 6/06).
26. ↵
    1. Salisbury, F.B., and
    2. C.W. Ross

    . 1978. Plant Physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA. 422 pp.
27. ↵
    1. Scheu, S., and
    2. J. Schauermann

    . 1994. Decomposition of roots and twigs: Effects of wood type (beech and ash), diameter, site of exposure and macro fauna exclusion. Plant and Soil 163: 13–24.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Smith, W.B., and
    2. S.R. Shifley

    . 1984. Diameter Growth, Survival, and Volume Estimates for Trees in Indiana and Illinois. Res. Pap. NC-257. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
29. ↵
    1. Study of Critical Environmental Problems (SCEP)

    . 1970. Man’s Impact on the Global Environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. ↵
    1. Taha, H.

    1996. Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Atmospheric Environment 30: 3423–3430.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. TreePeople

    . 2006. Get Involved—Why Trees? http://www.treepeople.org/vfp.dll?OakTre~getPag~&PNPK=59 (accessed 6/06).
32. ↵
    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    . 2004. Incorporating Emerging and Voluntary Measures in a State Implementation Plan (SIP). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/evm_ievm_g.pdf (accessed 6/06).