Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Oxygen Production by Urban Trees in the United States

David J. Nowak, Robert Hoehn and Daniel E. Crane
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2007, 33 (3) 220-226; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2007.026
David J. Nowak
David J. Nowak (corresponding author), Project Leader, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Robert Hoehn
Robert Hoehn, Biological Science Technician, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Daniel E. Crane
Daniel E. Crane, Information Technology Specialist, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY 13210, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of data collection in cities using 0.04 ha circular plots.

    CityYearNumber of plots
    Atlanta, GA1997205
    Baltimore, MD1999200
    Boston, MA1996217
    Calgary, Alberta1998350
    Freehold, NJ1998144
    Jersey City, NJ1998220
    Minneapolis, MNz2004110
    Moorestown, NJ2000206
    Morgantown, WV2004136
    New York, NY1996206
    Philadelphia, PA1996210
    San Francisco, CA2004194
    Syracuse, NYy2001197
    Toronto, Ontariox2000211
    Washington. DCw2004201
    Woodbridge, NJ2000215
    • ↵zNowak et al. 2006b.

    • ↵yNowak and O’Connor 2001.

    • ↵xKenney et al. 2001.

    • ↵wNowak et al. 2006c.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Oxygen production by urban forests in various cities and its relative effect compared with the city population.

    Trees (×1,000)Oxygen prod.z (t/year × 1,000)Oxygen offsetyPer person offsetx
    CityTotalSENet totalSENet w/d totalSENet no. of people (% pop)Net w/d no. of people (% pop)Net no./haNet w/d no./haNet no. of treesNet w/d no. of trees
    Atlanta, GA  9,415  749112  88612366,400 (88%)280,300 (67%)29222634
    Baltimore, MD  2,627  570  39  525  4127,700 (20%)  82,500 (13%)29192132
    Boston, MA  1,183  109  25  219  282,900 (14%)60,400 (10%)26191420
    Calgary, Alberta11,8892,777  52  745  6169,000 (19%)147,700 (17%)33287081
    Freehold, NJ      48      6    1  0  1  0    4,300 (39%)    2,800 (25%)25161117
    Jersey City, NJ    136    22    2  0  2  0    7,000 (3%)    5,100 (2%)16111927
    Minneapolis, MN    979  165  22  311  6  70,200(18%)  36,200 (9%)18  91427
    Moorestown, NJ    583    53    9  1  7  1  29,700(160%)  22,300(120%)28212026
    Morgantown, WV    658    79    7  1  5  1  22,800 (85%)  17,800 (66%)29222937
    New York, NY  5,212  719102115512333,600 (4%)180,500(2%)20111629
    Philadelphia, PA  2,113  211  39  429  4127,200 (8%)  93,000 (6%)24171723
    San Francisco, CA    668    98  12  211  1  40,200 (5%)  36,900 (5%)28261718
    Syracuse, NY    876  119  13  111  1  42,800 (29%)  37,200 (25%)29252024
    Toronto, Ontario  7,542  889  98107610318,300(13%)246,500 (10%)25192431
    Washington, DC  1,928  224  39  431  3127,400 (22%)101,400(18%)28221519
    Woodbridge, NJ    986    97  13  110  1  43,900 (44%)  32,000 (32%)25182231
    • ↵zAnnual oxygen production by the urban forest (thousands of metric tons per year). Multiply by 1.102 to convert to tons.

    • ↵yNumber of people and percent of city population that urban forest oxygen production offsets in terms of average adult human oxygen consumption per year.

    • ↵xAverage number of people whose oxygen consumption is offset by oxygen production per hectare of tree cover in the city (no./ha; divide by 2.471 to convert to no./ac) and average number of trees needed in city to offset the oxygen consumption of one adult human (no. of trees).

    • Net = net oxygen production of population without consideration of decomposition; Net w/d = net oxygen production of population considering decomposition; net production minus estimated oxygen consumed resulting from decomposition; SE = standard error.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 33 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 33, Issue 3
May 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Oxygen Production by Urban Trees in the United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Oxygen Production by Urban Trees in the United States
David J. Nowak, Robert Hoehn, Daniel E. Crane
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2007, 33 (3) 220-226; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2007.026

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Oxygen Production by Urban Trees in the United States
David J. Nowak, Robert Hoehn, Daniel E. Crane
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2007, 33 (3) 220-226; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2007.026
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments.
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Air quality
  • environmental quality
  • tree benefits
  • urban forests

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire