Predicting Wood Decay in Eucalypts Using an Expert System and the IML-Resistograph Drill

LITERATURE CITED

1. 1. Barrett, D.K.

   1987. Portable ‘compression strength meter’; a tool for the detection and quantification of decay in trees. Arboricultural Journal 11: 313–322.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Bergsten, U.,
   2. J. Lindeberg,
   3. A. Rindby, and
   4. R. Evans

   . 2001. Batch measurements of wood density on intact or prepared drill cores using x-ray microdensitometry. Wood Science and Technology 35: 435–452.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Moore, G.,
   2. May, P.,
   3. Hitchmough, J.,
   4. Delpratt, J.,
   5. Kenyon, P., and
   6. P. Esdale

   1. Blazé, K.

   1992. Electronic assessment of tree condition, pp. 135–145. In Scientific Management of Plants in the Urban Environment. Moore, G., May, P., Hitchmough, J., Delpratt, J., Kenyon, P., and P. Esdale, Eds. Conference Proceedings. Centre for Urban Horticulture, Melbourne.
4. 1. Bucur, V.

   2003. Nondestructive Characterization and Imaging of Wood. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 354 pp.
5. ↵
   1. Costello, L., and
   2. S. Quarles

   . 1999. Detection of wood decay in blue gum and elm: An evaluation of the IML-Resistograph^® and the portable drill. Journal of Arboriculture 25: 311–317.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Cown, D.J.

   1978. Comparison of the pilodyn and torsiometer methods for the rapid assessment of wood density in living trees. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 8: 384–391.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Downes, G.M.,
   2. I.L. Hudson,
   3. C.A. Raymond,
   4. G.H. Dean,
   5. A.J. Michell,
   6. L.R. Schimleck,
   7. R. Evans, and
   8. A. Muneri

   . 1997. Sampling Plantation Eucalypts for Wood and Fibre Properties. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra. 132 pp.
8. 1. Evans, R.,
   2. G. Gartside, and
   3. G. Downes

   . 1995. Present and prospective use of Silviscan—An instrument for the rapid measurement of wood properties. Research Report, Melbourne, The CRC for Hardwood Fibre & Paper Science: 47: 4 pp.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Gilbert, E., and
   2. E. Smiley

   . 2004. Picus sonic tomography for the quantification of decay in white oak (Quercus alba) and hickory (Carya spp.). Journal of Arboriculture 30: 277–281.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Greaves, B.L.,
    2. N.M.G. Borralho,
    3. C.A. Raymond, and
    4. A. Farrington

    . 1996. Use of a Pilodyn for the indirect selection of basic density in Eucalyptus nitens. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1643–1650.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Harris, R.W.

    1992. Arboriculture. Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, NJ. 674 pp.
12. ↵
    1. Harris, R.W.,
    2. J.R. Clark, and
    3. N.P. Matheny

    . 2004. Arboriculture. Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, NJ. 578 pp.
13. 1. Isik, F., and
    2. B. Li

    . 2003. Rapid assessment of wood density of live trees using the IML-Resistograph for selection in tree improvement programs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 2426–2435.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Kersten, W., and
    2. F.W.M.R. Schwarze

    . 2005. Development of decay in the sapwood of trees wounded by the use of decay-detecting devises. Arboricultural Journal 28: 165–181.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Matheny, N.,
    2. J. Clark,
    3. D. Attewell,
    4. K. Hillery,
    5. A. Graham, and
    6. G. Posner

    . 1999. Assessment of fracture moment and fracture angle in 25 tree species in the united states using the fractometer. Journal of Arboriculture 25: 18–23.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Mattheck, C.G.,
    2. H. Breloer,
    3. K.A. Bethge,
    4. W.A. Albrecht, and
    5. A.W. Zipse

    . 1995. Use of the fractometer to determine the strength of wood with incipient decay. Journal of Arboriculture 21: 105–112.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Mishiro, A.

    1996. Effect of density on ultrasonic velocity in wood. Mokuzai Gakkai Shi 42: 887–894.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Moura, V.P.G.,
    2. R.D. Barnes, and
    3. J.S. Birks

    . 1987. A comparison of three methods of assessing wood density in provenances of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. and other Eucalyptus species in Brazil. Australian Journal of Forest Research 17: 83–90.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Nicolotti, G., and
    2. P. Miglietta

    . 1998. Using high-technology instruments to assess defects in trees. Journal of Arboriculture 24: 297–302.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Nicolotti, G.,
    2. L.V. Socco,
    3. R. Martinis,
    4. A. Godio, and
    5. L. Sambuelli

    . 2003. Application and comparison of three tomographic techniques for detection of decay in trees. Journal of Arboriculture 29: 66–77.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Ouis, D.

    2003. Non-destructive techniques for detecting decay in standing trees. Arboricultural Journal 27: 159–177.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Rinn, F.,
    2. F.H. Schweingruber, and
    3. E. Schar

    . 1996. IML-Resistograph and x-ray density charts of wood comparative evaluation of drill resistance profiles and x-ray density charts of different wood species. Holzforschung 50: 303–311.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Hodge, S.J.

    1. Seaby, D.A.

    1991. Recent advances in detection of wood decay, pp. 168–176. In Research for Practical Arboriculture. Hodge, S.J., Ed. HMSO. University of York.
24. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.

    1979. Tree decay: An expanded concept. USDA Forest Service Information Bulletin 419. 72 pp.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Shigo, A.L.

    1991. Modern Arboriculture, Shigo & Trees, New Hampshire. 421 pp.
26. 1. Smiley, E.T., and
    2. B.R. Fraedrich

    . 1992. Determining strength loss from decay. Journal of Arboriculture 18: 201–204.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Tyrell, I.

    1999. True Gardens of the Gods: Californian–Australian Environmental Reform. University of California Press, California. 327 pp.
28. 1. Wade, P.J.

    1975. The Fujikura-Arborsonic Decay Detector Concept, Development & Operation. Fujikura Europe Limited. 11 pp.
29. 1. Wilkes, J., and
    2. W.A. Heather

    . 1983. Correlation of resistance to a pulsed current with several wood properties in living eucalypts. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 13: 139–145.

    OpenUrl