Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Evaluation of the Fate of Ice Storm-Damaged Urban Maple (Acer) Trees

Christopher J. Luley and Jerry Bond
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 2006, 32 (5) 214-220; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2006.027
Christopher J. Luley
Christopher J. Luley (corresponding author), Urban Forestry LLC, 6050 Hicks Rd., Naples, NY 14512, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Jerry Bond
Jerry Bond, Davey Resource Group, 3904 Willowdale Lane, Geneva NY 14456-9267, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The number of trees in the species by diameter by crown loss matrix that was created to evaluate the effect of ice damage in northern New York.

    Crown loss categories
    Diameter1 (0%–25%)2 (26%–50%)3 (51%–75%)Total
    Silver and red maple6″–18″  26    4    6  36
    6″–18″  14  18  30  62
    Over 30″  12  11  22  45
    Subtotals  52  33  49143
    Sugar maple6″–18″  14    9    9  32
    6″–18″  22  18  18  58
    Over 30″  12  13  10  35
    Subtotals  48  40  37125
    Norway maple6″–18″  30  23  20  73
    6″–18″  17  11  10  37
    Over 30″    1    2    0    3
    Subtotals  48  36  24113
    Overall totals148109123381
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Data collected during the resurvey of ice storm-damaged trees in 2004.

    VariableComments
    StatusWhether the tree was found or removed
    Diameter at 13.7 mMeasured using a diameter tape
    ConditionSubjective estimate of overall tree condition based on a categorical ranking on a 1 to 4 scale with 4 = good, 3 = fair, 2 = poor, and 1 = dead
    Dead smallThe number of small-sized dead branches in the crown that were 2 to 4 in in diameter, branches estimated at 6 in from the point of attachment
    Dead mediumThe number of medium-sized dead branches in the crown that were 4 to 6 in in diameter, branches measured at 6 in from the point of attachment
    Dead largeThe number of small dead branches in the crown that were greater than 6 in in diameter, branches measured at 6 in from the point of attachment
    Hazard smallDefective branches (excluding dead branches) that were 2 to 4 in in diameter measured at 6 in from the point of attachment that had developed as a result of the ice storm damage
    Hazard mediumDefective branches (excluding dead branches) that were 4 to 6 in in diameter measured at 6 in from the point of attachment that had developed as a result of the ice storm damage
    Hazard largeDefective branches (excluding dead branches) that were greater than 6 in in diameter measured at 6 in from the point of attachment that had developed as a result of the ice storm damage
    Sprouts per pruning woundThe average number of epicormic sprouts from ice storm origin pruning wounds; the wounds had to be greater than 4 in in diameter
    Sprouts per ripped branchThe average number of epicormic sprouts from ice storm origin ripped branches (branches that were broken but not pruned after the ice storm); the branches had to be greater than 4 in in diameter
    Wound decay percentagePercent of pruning wounds with an observable cavity from decay
    Wound closureAverage amount of woundwood in inches on the edge of pruning wounds that were greater than 4 in in diameter
    Crown lossThe amount of crown missing in 5% categories in comparison to a full crown (full crown less any loss resulting from shading, utility pruning, crown raising, or previous ice storm damage)
    DiebackEstimated amount of the total crown in 5% categories showing branch dieback or death in 5% categories.
    Crown densityEstimated amount of light blocked by the crown of the tree compared with standardized crown density charts (FIA 2006) in which 100% means no light is coming through the crown
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Removal rate for tree species.

    SpeciesRemoval percentage
    Norway maple28.3
    Silver and red24.8
    Sugar maple29.8
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Removal percentage by diameter class.

    Diameter classRemoval percentage
    15.2 to 45.7 cm (6–18 in)24.8
    45.7 to 76.2 cm (18–30 in)26.7
    76.2+ cm (30+ in)30.1
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Removal percentage by crown loss category.

    Crown loss categoryRemoval percentage
    0% to 25%28.7
    25% to 50%24.8
    50%+32.4
    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Mean comparisons for the tree condition rating.

    SpeciesAverage per tree
    Sugar maple3.2 a
    Silver maple3.4 ab
    Norway maple3.6 b
    • Condition rating in which 1 = dead, 2 = poor, 3 = fair and 4 = good.

    • Means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P = 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 7.

    Mean comparisons for the significant categories found in the analysis of variance on the average number of dead small-, medium-, and large-sized branches.

    SpeciesSmall dead branchesMedium dead branchesLarge dead branches
    Average per treeDiameter categoryAverage per treeDiameter categoryAverage per treeDiameter categoryAverage per tree
    Sugar maple1.18 a15.2 to 45.7 cm (6–18 in)0.31 a15.2 to 45.7 cm (6–18 in)0.10 a15.2 to 45.7 cm (6–18 in)0.02 a
    Silver maple0.59 ab45.7 to 76.2 cm (18–30 in)0.77 ab45.7 to 76.2 cm (18–30 in)0.22 ab45.7 to 76.2 cm (18–30 in)0.11 ab
    Norway maple0.26 b76.2+ cm (30+ in)1.19 b76.2+ cm (30+ in)0.55 b76.2+ cm (30+ in)0.36 b
    • Means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P = 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 8.

    Mean comparisons for significant categories found in the analysis of variance on the amount of wound closure per wound.

    SpeciesAverage inches per woundDiameter categoryAverage inches per woundCrown loss categoryAverage inches per wound
    Sugar maple0.91 a15.2 to 45.7 cm (6–18 in)1.4 a0% to 25%1.4 a
    Silver maple1.2 ab45.7 to 76.2 cm (18–30 in)1.1 b25% to 50%1.3 ab
    Norway maple1.5 b76.2+ cm (30+ in)1.1 b50%+1.0 b
    • Means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P = 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 9.

    Mean comparisons for the significant categories found in the analysis of variance on the sprouts per wound and ripped branches.

    SpeciesAverage number per woundSpeciesAverage number per ripped branchDiameter categoryAverage number per ripped branch
    Sugar maple0.1 aSugar maple0.1 a15.2 to 45.7 cm (6–18 in)1.6 a
    Silver maple1.0 bSilver maple1.6 b45.7 to 76.2 cm (18–30 in)0.8 b
    Norway maple0.5 abNorway maple1.1 b76.2+ cm (30+ in)0.9 ab
    • Means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P = 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 10.

    Mean comparisons for the significant categories found in the analysis of variance on the crown transparency and crown loss.

    SpeciesAverage crown transparencySpeciesAverage crown missingCrown loss categoryAverage crown missing
    Sugar maple73 aSugar maple33 a0% to 25%14 a
    Silver maple63 bSilver maple36 a25% to 50%40 b
    Norway maple82 aNorway maple19 b50%+68 b
    • Means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P = 0.05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 32 (5)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 32, Issue 5
September 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the Fate of Ice Storm-Damaged Urban Maple (Acer) Trees
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the Fate of Ice Storm-Damaged Urban Maple (Acer) Trees
Christopher J. Luley, Jerry Bond
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2006, 32 (5) 214-220; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2006.027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of the Fate of Ice Storm-Damaged Urban Maple (Acer) Trees
Christopher J. Luley, Jerry Bond
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2006, 32 (5) 214-220; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2006.027
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Energy Potential of Urban Tree Pruning Waste
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Acer platanoides
  • Acer saccharinum
  • Acer saccharum
  • canopy loss
  • ice damage
  • maple species
  • Norway maple
  • removal rate
  • silver maple
  • sprouting
  • tree response

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire