Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Growth and Water Use Characteristics of Six Eastern North American Oak (Quercus) Species and the Implications for Urban Forestry

Daniel K. Struve, Petra Sternberg, Nick Drunasky, Kurt Bresko and Rico Gonzalez
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 2006, 32 (5) 202-213; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2006.026
Daniel K. Struve
Daniel K. Struve (corresponding author), Professor, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 2001 Fyffe Ct., Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Petra Sternberg
Petra Sternberg, Graduate Student, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 2001 Fyffe Ct., Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Nick Drunasky
Nick Drunasky, Former Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 2001 Fyffe Ct., Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt Bresko
Kurt Bresko, Research Associate, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 2001 Fyffe Ct., Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Rico Gonzalez
Rico Gonzalez, Former Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 2001 Fyffe Ct., Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    (A and B) Seedling water use expressed relative to seedling height: as g water use seedling−1 cm ET−1 day−1 (A) or as height-adjusted water use: g water use seedling−1 cm ET−1 day−1 versus g water use cm−1 height cm ET−1 day−1 in Quercus rubra family 23.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Height-adjusted water use expressed relative to individual seedling height in Quercus rubra family 23 (A) Q. macrocarpa family 35 (B) in Quercus palustris family 30 (C).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Height, morphology, and dry weights of six oak species in experiments 1, 2, and 3.

    Experiment no.SpeciesnQMIzHeight (cm)Surface area (cm2)Root length (cm)Dry weight (g)Shoot to root ratio
    LeafRootShootRootTotal
    1Q. rubra103 to 450.6 by1190.7 ab457.1 ab5001.3 b24.9 b25.0 b49.0 b1.0 a
    Q. shumardii103 to 463.1 b1596.8 b648.0 b5436.2 b22.4 b17.6 b40.0 b1.3 a
    Q. velutina102 to 329.6 a  737.8 a328.6 a3014.3 a  8.2 a  4.8 a13.0 a1.7 b
    2Q. macrocarpa25231.0 b  634.9 c168.2 c1265.2 b  7.3 b  7.7 b15.0 c1.1 a
    Q. palustris25221.1 a  203.2 a83.2 a661.4 a  2.4 a  2.2 a  4.6 a1.1 a
    Q. prinus25219.3 a  463.1 b102.7 b692.4 a  3.8 a  2.7 a  6.5 b1.4 b
    3Q. macrocarpa203 to 443.9 a1414.4 a138.0 b1271.7 b16.5 a31.0 b47.5 b0.5 a
    Q. prinus203 to 481.9 b1882.5 b  71.2 a  169.4 a21.5 b  9.5 a31.0 a2.3 b
    • ↵z Quercus morphologic index are for the lag-phase (Hanson et al. 1986).

    • ↵y Means within an experiment and column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other using the Student-Neuman-Kels test at the ∝ = 0.05 level of significance.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Water use of six oak species in experiments 1, 2, and 3.

    Experiment no.SpeciesWater use (g water per day1)
    Seedling−1cm−1 heightcm−2 area
    LeafRoot
    1Q. rubra463.2 bz  9.2 a0.39 a1.0 ab
    Q. shumardii510.6 c  8.1 a0.32 a0.8 a
    Q. velutina353.4 a11.9b0.48 b1.1 b
    2Q. macrocarpa131.7 b  4.5 a0.55 a0.9 a
    Q. palustris102.3 a  5.1 a0.60 a1.5 b
    Q. prinus103.9 a  5.9 b0.33 a0.3 ab
    3Q. macrocarpa156.2 a  4.3 b0.12 b1.3 a
    Q. prinus163.0 a  2.1 a0.09 a2.8 b
    • ↵z Means within an experiment and column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other using the Waller-Duncan test at the ∝ = 0.05 level of significance.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Principal component correlation matrixes for Quercus macrocarpa, Q. palustris, and Q. prinus seedlings in experiment 2.

    VariableComponent
    Q. macrocarpaQ. palustrisQ. prinus
    12312123
    Height  0.74−0.34−0.38  0.83−0.43  0.82−0.02  0.03
    Leaf area  0.85−0.11  0.32  0.93−0.19  0.85  0.47  0.08
    Root area  0.83  0.36−0.3  0.92  0.34  0.89−0.32  0.16
    Dry weight shoot  0.95−0.07  0.04  0.97−0.08  0.94  0.27  0.15
        Root  0.88  0.31−0.07  0.92  0.32  0.88−0.23  0.33
        Total plant  0.95  0.15−0.02  0.97  0.14  0.96  0.08  0.23
    Water use seedling−1  0.84  0.13  0.32  0.86−0.09  0.74  0.56  0.20
        cm−1 height−0.37  0.66  0.65−0.67  0.49−0.66  0.35  0.27
        cm−2 leaf area−0.62  0.53−0.28−0.83  0.39−0.66  0.09  0.67
        cm−2 root area−0.80−0.24  0.05−0.86−0.10−0.67  0.41  0.55
    Shoot-to-root ratio  0.41  0.82−0.34  0.23  0.88−0.36−0.70  0.55
    Cumulative percent of total variation explained62.078.386.871.586.262.776.888.5
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Principal component matrixes for Quercus macrocarpa and Q. prinus seedlings in experiment 3.

    VariableComponent
    Q. macrocarpaQ. prinus
    1234123
    Height  0.90  0.13−0.26−0.13  0.14  0.91−0.26
    Leaf area  0.87  0.30−0.17−0.17  0.26  0.83−0.31
    Root area  0.40−0.20−0.71  0.46  0.80−0.07−0.26
    Dry weight shoot  0.57−0.54  0.52  0.31  0.74  0.39  0.50
        Root  0.01−0.89−0.01−0.36  0.67−0.26  0.56
        Total plant  0.46−0.75−0.42  0.12  0.79  0.06  0.60
    Water use seedling−1  0.54  0.64−0.09−0.01−0.37  0.88  0.13
        cm−1 height−0.84  0.26  0.03  0.17−0.65−0.08  0.55
        cm−2 leaf area−0.82  0.08  0.09  0.21−0.78  0.01  0.55
        cm−2 root area−0.19  0.54  0.65−0.40−0.69  0.64  0.23
    Shoot-to-root ratio  0.43  0.45  0.47  0.59  0.40  0.70  0.24
    Cumulative percent of total variation explained37.762.978.488.337.668.685.8
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Water use of three Quercus species in experiment 4.

    SpeciesFamilynHeight (cm)Water use (g water day−1 cm ET−1)
    Seedlingcm height
    Q. macrocarpa258432.4 (15.3)z447.1 (174.9)16.3 (8.4)
    349340.2 (14.2)388.0 (83.1)10.7 (3.2)
    species avg.36.5 (15.1)391.3 (144.4)12.7 (7.1)
    Q. palustris209841.7 (25.8)360.9 (81.9)10.6 (3.6)
    289664.7 (20.0)771.7 (223.9)12.7 (4.0)
    307644.5 (15.8)597.8 (166.5)14.8 (6.1)
    species avg.49.9 (23.9)552.6 (227.6)12.6 (5.0)
    Q. rubra218663.9 (31.1)476.9 (134.6)  9.1 (4.2)
    227026.4 (16.5)313.6 (90.4)14.2 (4.6)
    239458.8 (27.5)483.6 (114.5)  9.8 (4.2)
    244739.6 (17.4)333.4 (103.5)  9.1 (2.3)
    266338.4 (20.8)469.5 (146.5)14.5 (6.0)
    279846.2 (23.0)475.9 (138.3)12.7 (6.4)
    298155.2 (23.3)394.4 (111.8)  7.8 (2.5)
    317540.3 (17.4)353.7 (99.4)  9.8 (3.3)
    328946.6 (81.6)412.1 (14.1)  9.8 (3.9)
    339237.0 (21.9)683.5 (183.4)24.4 (12.0)
    358054.9 (18.8)636.8 (234.5)12.5 (5.0)
    species avg.46.9 (24.3)466.4 (176.0)12.2 (7.4)
    • ↵z Values within parentheses are the standard deviation of the mean.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Correlation between height and various water use characteristics for Quercus macrocarpa, Q. palustris, and Q. rubra seedlings in QMI Lag-3 to 4 growth stage (experiment 4).

    SpeciesFamilynCorrelationz
    123
    Q. macrocarpa25  840.63y−0.02−0.63
    34  930.59−0.13−0.81
    All families1770.44  0.05−0.66
    Q. palustris20  980.72−0.53−0.89
    28  960.56  0.18−0.65
    30  760.52  0.18−0.66
    All families2500.59  0.20−0.55
    Q. rubra21  860.59−0.16−0.82
    22  700.77−0.37−0.80
    23  930.68−0.20−0.79
    24  470.82−0.18−0.68
    26  630.65−0.06−0.71
    27  980.38  0.12−0.78
    29  810.71−0.07−0.70
    31  750.76−0.21−0.74
    32  890.17−0.26−0.81
    33  920.72−0.42−0.84
    35  800.62−0.26−0.50
    All families8950.47−0.19−0.62
    • ↵z Correlations: 1 = height with g water use seedling−1 cm ET−1 day−1; 2 = g water use seedling−1 cm ET1 day−1 with g water use cm−1 height cm ET1 day−1; 3 = height with g water use cm−1 height cm ET1 day−1.

    • ↵y Correlation coefficients in bold are significant at the 0.05 level.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 32 (5)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 32, Issue 5
September 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Growth and Water Use Characteristics of Six Eastern North American Oak (Quercus) Species and the Implications for Urban Forestry
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Growth and Water Use Characteristics of Six Eastern North American Oak (Quercus) Species and the Implications for Urban Forestry
Daniel K. Struve, Petra Sternberg, Nick Drunasky, Kurt Bresko, Rico Gonzalez
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2006, 32 (5) 202-213; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2006.026

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Growth and Water Use Characteristics of Six Eastern North American Oak (Quercus) Species and the Implications for Urban Forestry
Daniel K. Struve, Petra Sternberg, Nick Drunasky, Kurt Bresko, Rico Gonzalez
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2006, 32 (5) 202-213; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2006.026
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Dry weight
  • water use efficiency
  • xeric- and mesic-site adapted species.
  • Species used in this study
  • Bur oak (Quercus macrocarpus (Michx.))
  • pin oak (Q. palustris (Muenchh.))
  • chestnut oak (Q. prinus (L.))
  • northern red oak (Q. rubra (L))
  • (Q. shumardii (Buckl.))
  • (Q. velutina (Lamb.))

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire