Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Comparison of Structural and Noncompacted Soils for Trees Surrounded by Pavement

E. Thomas Smiley, Lisa Calfee, Bruce R. Fraedrich and Emma J. Smiley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 2006, 32 (4) 164-169; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2006.022
E. Thomas Smiley
E. Thomas Smiley, Ph.D. (corresponding author), Arboricultural Researcher, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, Adjunct Professor, Clemson University, 13768 Hamilton Road, Charlotte, NC 28278, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Lisa Calfee
Lisa Calfee, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Queens University, Charlotte, NC, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce R. Fraedrich
Bruce R. Fraedrich, Ph.D., Director, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, Charlotte, NC, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma J. Smiley
Emma J. Smiley, Research Technician, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, Charlotte, NC, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Research plot photographed from above in July 2005, approximately 14 months after plot establishment, labeled to show the different treatments: compacted soil, Stalite, Stalite/soil mixture, gravel/soil mixture, and suspended pavement over noncompacted soil.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Snowgoose cherry (Prunus serrulata) conditions 14 months after planting in 200 ft3 of soil medium covered with concrete.

    TreatmentAverage trunk diameter (cm)Average diameter change since planting (cm)Average twig growth 2005 (cm)Average visual foliar rating (0–5 scale)Average SPADAverage SPAD change since plantingAverage visual dieback (percentage of crown)Total root length at rhizotron window (cm)
    Gravel/soil2.77 a*0.433 a10.13 b3.83 ab42.35 b−6.3 ab  5.83 a1580
    Stalite/soil2.68 a0.283 bc  9.37 b3.17 bc40.63 bc−2.3 ab12.50 a    24
    Stalite2.53 b0.183 c  2.23 b2.67 c36.05 c−6.7 ab15.83 a  774
    Compacted soil2.75 a0.350 ab  7.80 b3.17 bc39.15 bc−8.6 b31.67 b    37
    Noncompacted soil2.80 a0.417 a21.70 a4.33 a47.47 a−0.25 a  9.17 a1415
    • ↵* Means with the same letter were not significantly different as determined by analysis of variance with Student-Newman-Keuls separation of mean (P = 0.05).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Bosque lacebark elm (Ulmus parvifolia) conditions 14 months after planting in 200 ft3 of soil medium covered with concrete.

    TreatmentAverage trunk diameter (cm)Average diameter change since planting (cm)Average twig growth 2005 (cm)Average visual foliar rating (0–5 scale)Average SPADAverage SPAD change since plantingAverage visual dieback (percentage of crown)Total root length at rhizotron window (cm)
    Gravel/soil2.35 a*0.52 ab23.97 a3.5 ab37.93 b  −7.48 ab0 a  3
    Stalite/soil2.12 b0.28 bc11.33 c3.0 b36.48 b  −0.35 a0 a  0
    Stalite1.97 b0.15 c  3.13 d1.0 c13.30 c−16.80 b  6.7 b  0
    Compacted soil2.38 a0.52 ab17.33 b2.8 b33.95 b  −6.28 ab0 a  0
    Noncompacted soil2.57 a0.65 a24.73 a4.0 a44.00 a  −0.88 a0 a61
    • ↵* Means with the same letter were not significantly different as determined by analysis of variance with Student-Newman-Keuls separation of mean (P = 0.05).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 32 (4)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 32, Issue 4
November 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Structural and Noncompacted Soils for Trees Surrounded by Pavement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Structural and Noncompacted Soils for Trees Surrounded by Pavement
E. Thomas Smiley, Lisa Calfee, Bruce R. Fraedrich, Emma J. Smiley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2006, 32 (4) 164-169; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2006.022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Structural and Noncompacted Soils for Trees Surrounded by Pavement
E. Thomas Smiley, Lisa Calfee, Bruce R. Fraedrich, Emma J. Smiley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2006, 32 (4) 164-169; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2006.022
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Biobarrier
  • Bosque lacebark elm
  • CU Soil
  • geotextile
  • planting pits
  • Prunus serrulata
  • skeletal soil
  • Snowgoose cherry
  • soil compaction
  • Stalite
  • structural soil
  • suspended pavement
  • suspended sidewalks
  • Ulmus parvifolia
  • urban plaza
  • urban tree planting

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire