Status, Needs, and Knowledge Levels of Mississippi’s Communities Relative to Urban Forestry

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Dillman, D.A.

   2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd ed.) Wiley, New York, NY. 464 pp.
2. ↵
   1. Dwyer, J.F.,
   2. E.G. McPherson,
   3. R.A. Rowntree, and
   4. H.W. Schroeder

   . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18(5): 227–234.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Elmendorf, W.F.,
   2. V.J. Cotrone, and
   3. J.T. Mullen

   . 2003. Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability: Contrasting a Pennsylvania, U.S., study. Journal of Arboriculture 29(4): 237–248.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Grey, G.W.

   1978. What should be the role of state government in municipal arboriculture-–urban forestry? Journal of Arboriculture 4(3): 71–72.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Groninger, J.W.,
   2. D.D. Close, and
   3. C.M. Basman

   . 2002. Can small, rural communities practice urban forestry? Journal of Forestry 100(1): 23–28.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Johnson, C.

   1982. Political & administrative factors in urban-forestry programs. Journal of Arboriculture 8(6): 160–163.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Maco, S.E., and
   2. E.G. McPherson

   . 2002. Assessing canopy cover over streets and sidewalks in street tree populations. Journal of Arboriculture 28(6): 270–276.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. McPherson, E.G.

   1996. Research in Urban Forestry. Forest Research West, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
9. ↵
   1. Miller, R.W., and
   2. T.R. Bate

   . 1978. National implications of an urban forestry survey in Wisconsin. Journal of Arboriculture 4(6): 125–127.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Reis, P.D.

    2004. Urban and Community Forestry in Oregon: Results of the 2004 City Survey. http://egov.oregon.gov/ODF/URBAN_FORESTS/docs/04SurveyRptfinal.pdf (accessed 12/1/05).
11. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W.,
    2. T.L. Green, and
    3. T.J. Howe

    . 2003. Community tree programs in Illinois, U.S.: A statewide survey and assessment. Journal of Arboriculture 29(4): 218–225.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Kollin, C.

    1. Studer, N.

    2003. Urban forest program development in Washington state municipalities, pp. 21–23. In Kollin, C., (Ed.). 2003 National Urban Forest Conference Proceedings, 17–20 September 2003, San Antonio, TX. American Forests, Washington, DC.
13. ↵
    1. Tate, R.L.

    1982. Applying for federal funding grants for urban tree management activities. Journal of Arboriculture 8(4): 107–109.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Thompson, R.P., and
    2. J.J. Ahern

    . 2000. The State of Urban and Community Forestry in California. Technical Report No. 9. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Urban Forestry Program, San Luis Obispo, CA. 48 pp.
15. ↵
    1. Treiman, T., and
    2. J. Gartner

    . 2004. Community forestry in Missouri, U.S.: Attitudes and knowledge of local officials. Journal of Arboriculture 30(4): 205–213.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Watson, W.T.

    2004. Status of Urban Forestry in the South, Final Report. Department of Forest Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.