Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Soil Inoculum Potential and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization of Acer rubrum in Forested and Developed Landscapes

P. Eric Wiseman and Christina Wells
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2005, 31 (6) 296-302; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2005.038
P. Eric Wiseman
1Graduate Student, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0317, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Wells
2*Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0319, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Appleton, B.,
    2. J. Koci,
    3. S. French,
    4. M. Lestyan, and
    5. R. Harris
    . 2003. Mycorrhizal fungal inoculation of established street trees. J. Arboric. 29(2): 107–110.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Boerner, R.E.,
    2. B.G. DeMars, and
    3. P.N. Leicht
    . 1996. Spatial patterns of mycorrhizal infectiveness of soils long a successional chronosequence. Mycorrhiza 6: 79–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Brundrett, M.C., and
    2. B. Kendrick
    . 1988. The mycorrhizal status, root anatomy, and phenology of plants in a sugar maple forest. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1153–1173.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Brundrett, M.,
    2. G. Murase, and
    3. B. Kendrick
    . 1990. Comparative anatomy of roots and mycorrhizae of common Ontario trees. Can. J. Bot. 68: 551–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Coughlan, A.P.,
    2. Y. Dalpé,
    3. L. Lapointe, and
    4. Yves Piché
    . 2000. Soil pH-induced changes in root colonization, diversity, and reproduction of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from healthy and declining maple forests. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1543–1554.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Feng, G.,
    2. Y. Su,
    3. X. Li,
    4. H. Wang,
    5. F. Zhang,
    6. C. Tang,
    7. Z. Rengel
    . 2002. Histochemical visualization of phosphatase released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. J. Plant Nutr. 25(5): 969–980.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Findlay, C.M., and
    2. A.D. Kendle
    . 2001. Towards a mycorrhizal application decision model for landscape management. Landsc. Urban Plann. 56: 149–160.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Gould, A.B.,
    2. J.W. Hendrix, and
    3. R.S. Ferriss
    . 1996. Relationship of mycorrhizal activity to time following reclamation of surface mine land in western Kentucky. I. Propagule and spore population densities. Can. J. Bot. 74: 247–261.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Havlin, J.L.,
    2. J.D. Beaton,
    3. S.L. Tisdale, and
    4. W.L. Nelson
    . 1999. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 499 pp.
  10. ↵
    1. Jasper, D.A.,
    2. L.K. Abbott, and
    3. A.D. Robson
    . 1989. Soil disturbance reduces the infectivity of external hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 112: 93–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Jasper, D.A.,
    2. L.K. Abbott, and
    3. A.D. Robson
    . 1991. The effect of soil disturbance on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soils from different vegetation types. New Phytol. 118: 471–476.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Klingeman, W.E.,
    2. R.M. Augé, and
    3. P.C. Flanagan
    . 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizal assessment of ornamental trees grown in Tennessee field soils. HortScience 37(5): 778–782.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Klironomos, J.N,
    2. P. Moutoglis,
    3. B. Kendrick, and
    4. P. Widden
    . 1993. A comparison of spatial heterogeneity of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in two maple-forest soils. Can. J. Bot. 71: 1472–1480.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Koske, R.E., and
    2. J.N. Gemma
    . 1989. A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycol. Res. 92(4): 486–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Lovelock, C.E., and
    2. R. Miller
    . 2002. Heterogeneity in inoculum potential and effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 83(3): 823–832.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Martin, C.A., and
    2. J.C. Stutz
    . 1994. Growth of Argentine mesquite inoculated with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Arboric. 20: 134–138.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Marx, D.H.
    1991. The practical significance of ectomycorrhizae in forest establishment, pp. 54–90. In Ecophysiology of Ectomycorrhizae of Forest Trees. Marcus Wallenberg Foundation Symposia Proceedings, Vol. 7. M. Wallenberg Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.
  18. ↵
    1. Marx, D.H.,
    2. S.B. Maul, and
    3. C.E. Cordell
    . 1989. Application of specific ectomycorrhizal fungi in world forestry, pp. 78–98. In Frontiers in Industrial Mycology. American Mycological Society, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
  19. ↵
    1. McGonigle, T.P.,
    2. M.H. Miller,
    3. D.G. Evans,
    4. G.L. Fairchild, and
    5. J.A. Swan
    . 1990. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 115: 495–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Morrison, S.J.,
    2. P.A. Nicholl, and
    3. P.R. Hicklenton
    . 1993. VA mycorrhizal inoculation of landscape trees and shrubs growing under high fertility conditions. J. Environ. Hortic. 11(2): 64–71.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Richter, B.S.,
    2. R.L. Tiller, and
    3. J.C. Stutz
    . 2002. Assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules and colonization from abandoned agricultural fields and semi-arid grasslands in riparian floodplains. Appl. Soil Ecol. 20: 227–238.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Simmons, G.L., and
    2. P.E. Pope
    . 1988. Influence of soil water potential and mycorrhizal colonization on root growth of yellow-poplar and sweet gum seedlings grown in compacted soil. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 1392–1396.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Smith, S.E., and
    2. D.J. Read
    . 1997. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 605 pp.
  24. ↵
    1. Smith, S.E.,
    2. S. Dickson, and
    3. F.A. Smith
    . 2001. Nutrient transfer in arbuscular mycorrhizas: How are fungal and plant processes integrated? Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 28: 683–694.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture
    . 2005. Official Soil Series Descriptions. http://soils.usda.gov/soils/technical/classification/osd/index.html (accessed 1/20/05).
  26. ↵
    1. Stabler, L.B.,
    2. C.A. Martin, and
    3. J.C. Stutz
    . 2001. Effect of urban expansion on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal mediation of landscape tree growth. J. Arboric. 27(4): 193–201.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Stutz, J.C., and
    2. C.A. Martin
    . 1998. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity associated with ash trees in urban landscapes in Arizona. Phytopathology 88(9): S86.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Zahka, G.A.,
    2. K.L. Baggett, and
    3. B.L. Wong
    . 1995. Inoculum potential and other VAM fungi parameters in four sugar maple forests with different levels of stand dieback. For. Ecol. Manage. 75: 123–134.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 31 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 31, Issue 6
November 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Soil Inoculum Potential and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization of Acer rubrum in Forested and Developed Landscapes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Soil Inoculum Potential and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization of Acer rubrum in Forested and Developed Landscapes
P. Eric Wiseman, Christina Wells
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2005, 31 (6) 296-302; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2005.038

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Soil Inoculum Potential and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization of Acer rubrum in Forested and Developed Landscapes
P. Eric Wiseman, Christina Wells
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2005, 31 (6) 296-302; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2005.038
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Acer rubrum
  • arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  • mycorrhizae
  • red maple
  • soil acidity
  • soil disturbance

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire