Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Characteristics of Urban Forestry Programs in Utah, U.S.

Michael R. Kuhns, Brook Lee and Douglas K. Reiter
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2005, 31 (6) 285-295; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2005.037
Michael R. Kuhns
1*Professor, Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5230, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Brook Lee
2Forester, Colorado State Forest Service, Colorado State Forest Office, Steamboat Springs District, Walden, CO 80480, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas K. Reiter
3Research Associate, Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5215, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Adkins, R. van-C.,
    2. M.R. Kuhns,
    3. D.J. Blahna, and
    4. M.W. Blood
    . 1997. Urban forest management at Hill Air Force Base, Ogden, Utah. J. Arboric. 23(4): 136–143.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
    . 2005. Inflation Calculator. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Indexes Web site, www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm (accessed 4/4/05).
  3. ↵
    1. Carroll, P.
    2003. Urban Forestry in Large Cities: ‘Cutting Edge’ or ‘Cutting Out’, pp. 18–20. In Proceedings of the 2003 National Urban Forest Conference, 17–20 Sep. 2003, San Antonio, TX. American Forests, Washington, DC.
  4. ↵
    1. Dillman, D.A.
    2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley, New York, NY.
  5. ↵
    1. Elmendorf, W.F.,
    2. V.J. Cotrone, and
    3. J.T. Mullen
    . 2003. Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability: Contrasting a Pennsylvania, U.S., study. J. Arboric. 29(4): 237–247.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Flatley, T.
    2001. Cities demonstrate the importance of the urban forest. City Trees 37(1). www.urban-forestry.com.
  7. ↵
    1. Giedraitis, J., and
    2. J.J. Kielbaso
    . 1982. Municipal Tree Management. Urban Data Service Report 14(1). International City Management Association, Washington DC.
  8. ↵
    1. Kielbaso, J.J.,
    2. B. Beauchamp,
    3. K. Larison, and
    4. C. Randall
    . 1988. Trends in Urban Forestry Management. Baseline Data Report 20(1). International City Management Association, Washington DC.
  9. ↵
    1. Kielbaso, J.J.
    1990. Trends and issues in city forests. J. Arboric. 16(3): 69–76.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Kuhns, M.R.
    1998. Urban/community forestry in the Intermountain West. J. Arboric. 24(5): 280–285.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. R.A. Rowntree
    . 1989. Using structural measures to compare twenty-two U.S. street tree populations. Landsc. J. 8: 13–23.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. National Association of State Foresters
    . 1988. Forestry: A Community Tradition. National Association of State Foresters, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 23 pp.
  13. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. M.H. Noble,
    3. S.M. Sisinni, and
    4. J.F. Dwyer
    . 2001. People & trees: Assessing the U.S. urban forest resource. J. For. 99(3): 37–42.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Ottman, K., and
    2. J.J. Kielbaso
    . 1976. Managing Municipal Trees. Urban Data Service Report 1976, International City Management Association, Washington DC.
  15. ↵
    1. Reichenbach, M., and Community Planning Workshop
    . 1992. Urban and Community Forestry in Oregon: An Assessment with Recommendations for Initiating Action. Report prepared for Oregon Department of Forestry, August 1992. 62 pp.
  16. ↵
    1. Studer, N.
    2003. Urban Forest Program Development Washington State Municipalities, pp. 21–23. In Proceedings of the 2003 National Urban Forest Conference, 17–20 Sep. 2003, San Antonio, TX. American Forests, Washington, DC.
  17. ↵
    1. Thompson, R.P., and
    2. J.J. Ahern
    . 2000. The State of Urban Forestry in California. Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute Technical Report No. 9. San Luis Obispo, CA.
  18. ↵
    1. Treiman, T., and
    2. J. Gartner
    . 2004. Community forestry in Missouri, U.S.: Attitudes and knowledge of local officials. J. Arboric. 30(4): 205–213.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Tschantz, B.A., and
    2. P.L. Sacamano
    . 1995. Municipal Tree Management in the United States, pp. 198-201. In Proceedings of the 2003 National Urban Forest Conference, 17–20 Sep. 2003, San Antonio, TX. American Forests, Washington, DC.
  20. ↵
    1. USDA Forest Service (USDA-FS)
    . 2003. Performance Measurement Accountability System Desk Guide. USDA Forest Service State & Private Forestry, Cooperative Forestry/Urban & Community Forestry. 17 pp. www.fs.fed.us/spf/coop/library/PMAS/DeskGuide2004.pdf.
  21. ↵
    1. Watson, W.T.
    2003. Evolution of Municipal Urban Forestry in the South, pp. 14-17. In Proceedings of the 2003 National Urban Forest Conference, 17–20 Sep. 2003, San Antonio, TX. American Forests, Washington, DC.
  22. ↵
    1. Watson, W.T.
    2004. State of Urban Forestry in the South: Final Report. 6 pp. www.urbanforestrysouth.org.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 31 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 31, Issue 6
November 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characteristics of Urban Forestry Programs in Utah, U.S.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Characteristics of Urban Forestry Programs in Utah, U.S.
Michael R. Kuhns, Brook Lee, Douglas K. Reiter
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2005, 31 (6) 285-295; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2005.037

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Characteristics of Urban Forestry Programs in Utah, U.S.
Michael R. Kuhns, Brook Lee, Douglas K. Reiter
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2005, 31 (6) 285-295; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2005.037
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Urban Forestry
  • community forestry
  • program
  • Utah
  • Arboriculture
  • characteristics
  • volunteer

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire