Abstract
Hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae Annand) is an introduced homopteran that infests native eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis Carriere). It results in reduced tree vitality and, when untreated, death. A state-of-the-art microinjection device employing an air-over-hydraulic system was used to deliver a therapeutic dosage of imidacloprid into the active xylem tissues of affected hemlocks. Bioassays were conducted microscopically to determine HWA mortality post-treatment. Injected trees had significantly (P < 0.05) lower HWA populations compared to untreated controls; mean mortality for injected trees was over twice that of noninjected trees. The Arborjet VIPER system shows promise as a management tool in the treatment of HWA.
Hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA) is an introduced piercing–sucking insect that threatens forest and landscape hemlock species (Tsuga canadensis, T. caroliniana) throughout most of the tree’s geographic range (USDA Forest Service 2002). The insect inserts its stylet into the xylem ray parenchyma cells of hemlock to extract carbohydrates (McClure 1991). The tree’s vitality depends on these carbohydrates because this captured energy is crucial for growth, maintenance, reproduction, defense, and storage (Shigo 1991). McClure et al. (1996) have reported that dieback in hemlock may occur in 2 years, affecting the lower canopy first, and moves upward, even with HWA infestation distributed throughout the canopy.
For managing HWA infestations, three approaches are available: foliar sprays, soil injection, and trunk injection. A twice-yearly application of horticultural oil is the standard treatment for HWA, but efficacy depends on thorough foliar coverage of the contact insecticide and is subject to aerial drift. Soil injection of imidacloprid eliminates the problem of drift inherent in foliar applications, but leaching into the soil profile is a concern in sensitive sites. Microinjection is the most environmentally sensitive approach to pesticide application, but wounding and the possibility of subsequent girdling are of concern to the arborist. Arborjet VIPER microinjection was designed to address the concerns of environmental sensitivity and wounding of trees. It limits the number of injection sites set circumferentially around the trunk. The Arborjet VIPER system was selected for use in therapeutic treatments in this study (Figure 1).
METHODS
Tree Microinjection
Twenty-four hemlocks were microinjected between 14 June and 1 August 2002 for HWA management. Trees were treated using 10% formulation of 1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl) methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinime (imidacloprid) by trunk injection into the active sapwood. Dosage was based on diameter at breast height (dbh, 135 cm [54 in.] from soil level, using a Lufkin 6 m [19.8 ft] diameter tape). Mean dosage applied per 2.5 cm (1 in.) dbh was 2.0 mL (0.06 oz). Mean dbh of microinjected hemlocks was 41.3 cm [16.5 in.] and ranged from 18.8 to 85 cm (7.5 to 34 in.). All the microinjected trees were established urban forest trees.
Ports used in this study were cylindrical, barbed inserts with rubber septa that were set circumferentially into the trunk flare area. To place the ports, a portable 18.0 v Ryobi drill (model# HP1802M) with a 0.74 cm (0.3 in.) brad point bit was used to drill 2.5 cm (1 in.) into the active sapwood. The ports, 1 cm (0.4 in.) length x 0.9 cm (0.36 in.) diameter, tapering toward the proximal end, were configured with a “lip” to limit the depth of its setting at the current-year xylem. Set correctly, the port creates a small reservoir (1.5 × 0.75 cm [0.6 × 0.3 in.]) into which the solution is injected and from which it infuses into the tracheary elements of the tree. The probelike needle of the Arborjet device pierces the septum of the port and delivers up to 3.0 mL (0.09 oz) per trigger pull. Using the described port arrangement, 6.0 mL (0.18 oz) were deposited per port. For each tree, the total number of injection sites was determined using the formula dbh/3. Precise dosage delivery was aided by a pressure gauge at the tip of the injection device and 10 mL (0.3 oz) dose cartridge, or Dose-Sizer™. The tip gauge registered hydraulic pressures in the sapwood of Tsuga canadensis from 45 to 450 psi.
Collecting Samples from Hemlock
Twig samples were harvested in fall 2002 (between 22 October and 5 November) from 24 treated hemlocks randomly selected in the Winchester, Massachusetts, U.S. area. In addition, 24 nontreated trees were sampled at random during the same interval for HWA mortality assessment. Eight samples measuring 45 to 60 cm (18 to 24 in.) in length per tree were cut, bagged, labeled, refrigerated (at approximately 7.2°C [45°F] and 60% relative humidity), and evaluated within 3 days. Samples were taken using a no. 180 ARS Long Reach pruner capable of 3 m (3.3 ft) extension, effectively reaching to 4.8 m (5.3 ft) into the canopy. Samples were taken from infested branches, typically from the lower to mid canopy.
Evaluating Efficacy
Microinjection treatment efficacy was evaluated on the basis of insect mortality. HWA mortality was based on a percentage of dead insects (adults and nymphs) as determined by microscopic inspection of 240 45 cm (18 in.) samples infested with HWA. Insects were considered dead if they appeared desiccated, hard, discolored (darkened), and/or not responsive to stimuli (appendage, stylet, probe). The mortality percentage is the number of dead adelgids divided by total observed. HWA density is the number of live adelgids observed per linear centimeter of twig sample.
RESULTS
Percentage of HWA Mortality
In samples from treated trees, observed mean adelgid mortality was 85% for 104 samples, with a range of 58.2% to 100%. Two-thirds of treated samples had 80% mortality or greater. For untreated samples, the mean mortality in 88 samples was 37.9%, with a range of 6.9% to 81.7%. Mortality of 80% or greater was observed in only 2.3% of the untreated samples (Figure 2).
The data were analyzed using a Student’s t-test to determine the difference between the mean percentage mortality of the treated and control samples. Minitab calculated a t-value of 19.50 and a p-value of 0.000. We therefore have a 90% level of confidence that the true difference in the mean percentage of mortality of HWA of the treated and control populations ranges from 43.1% through 51.1%.
Live HWA Density
Live HWA density was calculated for each sample by dividing the number of live adelgids by the sample length. Live HWA density is expressed in live HWA per linear centimeter.
The mean live HWA density for 104 treated samples was 0.45 live HWA per linear centimeter. The range for treated samples was 0 through 2.6 live HWA per linear centimeter. Of all treated samples, 87.5% had less than 1 live adelgid per linear centimeter (Figure 3, top).
The mean live HWA density for 88 control samples was 1.99 live adelgids per linear centimeter. The range for the control samples was 0.039 through 8.73 live HWA per linear centimeter. Only 31.8% of the control samples had less than 1 live HWA per linear centimeter (Figure 3, bottom).
A Student’s t-test was used to determine the difference of the mean live HWA density on the treated and control samples. Minitab calculated a t-value of 9.18 and a p-value of 0.000. (Note: There were two outlier values in the treated sample and four outlier values in the control sample. The Student’s t-test was run without the outlier values, with the same results.) We therefore have a 90% level of confidence that the true difference between the mean live HWA density between the control and treatment populations ranges from1.26 through 1.81 live HWA per linear centimeter.
DISCUSSION
In this study, imidacloprid-injected trees had significantly lower HWA populations than noninjected trees. The mean percentage of HWA mortality of injected hemlocks was 85%—over twice the mean mortality of nontreated hemlock trees. Tattar et al. (1998) also found the translocation of microinjected imidacloprid had similar effect on controlling the HWA.
It has been established that as HWA density increases, shoot extension decreases (McClure 1991; Doccola et al. 2002). We suspect that in protracted infestations with high HWA density (>2.0 per linear centimeter), the reduction of vitality in hemlock branches also restricts translocation. In this study, 17% of the treated samples had HWA densities greater than 1 HWA per linear centimeter. Samples with high HWA density may have limited mortality due to reduced translocation of the systemic insecticide to those branches. Because movement of injected chemicals from injection site to target is dependent on the health of the transport tissues, it is critical to treat early while HWA populations are still low (<1 HWA per linear centimeter).
Furthermore, our goal was to achieve therapeutic levels of insecticide that extend protection and lengthen the injection cycle to every 2 to 3 years. Residue studies are ongoing; however, we believe higher residues will result from applying insecticides at rates higher than applied in this study.
CONCLUSIONS
Therapeutic trunk injection treatments using the Arborjet VIPER system resulted in HWA mortality sufficient to maintain health in trees. Eighty-seven percent of all treated samples had less than 1 live adelgid per linear centimeter. The results of this study suggest that the Arborjet VIPER system is an effective management tool for trunk injection applications in the urban environment.
Footnotes
Editor’s note: The authors have submitted this correction to their earlier paper, which was originally published in the November 2003 issue of the Journal of Arboriculture (29(6):327–330). This article clarifies the presentation of their statistical analyses.
- © 2005, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.