Individual Characteristics Affecting Participation in Urban and Community Forestry Programs in South Carolina, U.S.

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Alig, R.J.,
   2. F. Bedford,
   3. R.J. Moulton, and
   4. L. Lee

   . 1999. Long-term projection of urban and developed land area in the United States. In Keep America Growing—Balancing Working Lands and Development: Conference Proceedings (CD-ROM). American Farmland Trust, Washington, DC, Additional information at www.farmland.org (accessed 3/24/05).
2. ↵
   1. Alig, R.J.,
   2. A.J. Plantinga,
   3. S. Ahn, and
   4. J.D. Kline

   . 2003. Land use changes involving forestry in the United States 1952 to 1997, with Projections to 2050. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-587. 92 pp.
3. ↵
   1. Arnstein, S.R.

   1969. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 35(4): 216–224.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Cubbage, F.W.,
   2. J. O’Laughlin, and
   3. C.S. Bullock

   . 1993. Forest Resource Policy. Wiley, New York, NY. 592 pp.
5. ↵
   1. Dillman, D.A.

   1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY. 325 pp.
6. ↵
   1. Florida Division of Forestry

   . 2004. Urban and Community Forestry Grant Program. Tallahassee, FL. www.fldof.com/forest_management/cfa_urban_grants.html (accessed 3/24/05).
7. ↵
   1. Heimlich, R.E., and
   2. W.D. Anderson

   . 2001. Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Economic Reporting Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. Washington, DC. 88 pp.
8. ↵
   1. London, J.B., and
   2. N.L Hill

   . 2000. Land Conversion in South Carolina: State Makes the Top 10 List. Jim Self Center on the Future, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 4 pp.
9. ↵
   1. McPherson, E.G.,
   2. D.J. Nowak, and
   3. R.A. Rowntree

   1. McPherson, E.G.

   1994. Benefits and costs of tree planting and care in Chicago, pp. 115–133. In McPherson, E.G., D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree [Eds.]. Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186.
10. ↵
    1. National Arbor Day Foundation

    . 2004. Tree City USA. Nebraska City, NE. www.arborday.org/programs/treecityusa.cfm (accessed 3/24/05).
11. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. D.J. Nowak, and
    3. R.A. Rowntree

    1. Nowak, D.J.

    1994. Air pollution removal by Chicago’s urban forest, pp. 63–81 In McPherson, E.G., D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree [Eds.]. Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186.
12. ↵
    1. South Carolina Forestry Commission

    2003a. Personal communications with statewide program coordinator and foresters about past participants in U&CF programs.
13. ↵
    1. South Carolina Forestry Commission

    . 2003b. Awards 2003 Urban & Community Forestry Grants. Columbia, SC. www.state.sc.us/forest/03ucfgrant.pdf (accessed 3/24/05).
14. ↵
    1. South Carolina Forestry Commission

    . 2004. Urban and Community Forestry Grant Assistance Program. Columbia, SC. www.state.sc.us/forest/ucfgrantbr.pdf (accessed 3/24/05).
15. ↵
    1. USDA Forest Service

    . 2004. Urban Forestry: A Manual for the State Forestry Agencies in the Southern Region. www.urbanforestrysouth.usda.gov/pubs/ufmanual (accessed 3/24/05).
16. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census

    . 2000. Population Projections, Medium Level. Washington, DC. www.census.gov/population/www/projections/popproj.html (accessed 3/24/05).
17. ↵
    1. Vesterby, M., and
    2. K.S. Krupa

    . 2001. Major Uses of Land in the United States, 1997. Economic Reporting Service Statistical Bulletin No. 973. Washington, DC, 60 pp.
18. ↵
    1. Wisconsin DNR.

    2004. Urban & Community Forestry Program Information. Madison, WI. www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/forestry/UF/program (accessed 3/24/05).