Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Pruning Type Affects Decay and Structure of Crapemyrtle

Edward F. Gilman and Gary W. Knox
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 2005, 31 (1) 48-53; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2005.006
Edward F. Gilman
1*Professor, Environmental Horticulture Department, University of Florida, 1545 Fifield Hall, P.O. Box 110670, Gainesville, FL 32611-0670, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary W. Knox
2Professor, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 3261-0670, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The first (1), second (2), and third year (3) pruning cuts are clearly visible on topped trees (upper left). Pollard heads were prominent after the fourth year of removing sprouts back to the same position (lower left). Decay is clearly visible on topped trees behind the original heading cut made in 1998 (upper right); the barrier zone can be seen streaking back behind the heading cut (three small arrows). Small pockets of decay were restricted to the base of all sprouts in the pollard heads (middle right); arrows indicate protection zones that retarded decay. Sprouts that remained small compared to the largest sprout formed a visible collar (lower right).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Time required to pollard or top crapemyrtle in four consecutive years. Standard error bar is shown around each mean. Each value is the mean of ten trees.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Diameter of pruning cuts, length of barrier zone, and decay column length in longitudinal section behind heading cuts made through 2- to 3-year-old and 4- to 5-year-old wood 4 years after original heading cut. (Means are based on three stems on three trees in each treatment.)

    Pruning treatmentMean diameter of original heading cut (mm)Mean length of barrier zone (mm)Mean decay/discoloration column length (mm)
    Headed 2- to 3-year-old wood (pollard)18 (0.7 in.) by18 (0.7 in.) b8 (0.3 in.) b
    Headed 4- to 5-year-old wood (topped)27 (1.1 in.) c736 (29.0 in.) c58 (2.3 in.) c
    Not pruned0 a0 a0 a
    • z Distance in longitudinal section from heading cut to end of decay or discoloration, whichever is longer.

    • ↵y Means in a column are statistically different at P < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Number, length, and volume of dead stubsz greater than 6 mm (0.25 in.) diameter in the canopy following 4 years of different pruning treatments on crapemyrtle. (Means are based on three stems on three trees in each treatment.)

    Pruning treatmentMean number of dead stubs/treeMean length of of dead stubs (mm)Mean volume of dead stubs/tree (mm)
    Headed 2- to 3-year-old wood (pollard)27.3 by3.5 (0.14 in.) b644 b
    Headed 4- to 5-year-old wood (topped)105.0 c23.1 (0.91 in.) c3612 c
    Not pruned0 a0 a0 a
    • ↵z A dead stub resulting from a heading cut is the dead portion of a stem beyond the point of the closest live lateral branch, live sprout, or pollard head.

    • ↵y Means in a column are statistically different at P < 0.01.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 31 (1)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 31, Issue 1
January 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pruning Type Affects Decay and Structure of Crapemyrtle
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Pruning Type Affects Decay and Structure of Crapemyrtle
Edward F. Gilman, Gary W. Knox
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2005, 31 (1) 48-53; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2005.006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pruning Type Affects Decay and Structure of Crapemyrtle
Edward F. Gilman, Gary W. Knox
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2005, 31 (1) 48-53; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2005.006
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Pollarding
  • Topping
  • barrier zone
  • decay
  • restoration pruning
  • canopy cleaning

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire