Urban Forestry in a Multicultural Society

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Agyeman, J

   . 1995. People, Plants and Places. Southgate Publishers, Crediton, Devon, UK. 48 pp.
2. ↵
   1. Altman, N

   . 2002. Sacred Trees: Spirituality, Wisdom and Well-Being. Sterling Publishing, London, England. 200 pp.
3. ↵
   1. Berkin, C.,
   2. C. Miller,
   3. R. Cherny, and
   4. J. Gormly

   . 1995. Making America: A History of the United States. Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY. 500 pp.
4. ↵
   1. Berry, R

   . 1991. Celebrating diversity in urban forestry, pp 233–235. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Urban Forest Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
5. ↵
   British Trust for Conservation Volunteers (BTCV). 2002. Environments for All. Baseline review of BTCV’s work with disadvantaged communities by Black Environment Network. British Trust for Conservation Volunteers, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK. 16 pp.
6. ↵
   1. Brown, M., and
   2. J. Hanna (Eds.)

   . 1996. Roots of the Future— Ethnic Diversity in the Making of Britain. Commission for Racial Equality, London, England. 133 pp.
7. ↵
   1. Burgess, J

   . 1995. Growing in Confidence. Understanding People’s Perception of Urban Fringe Woodland. CCP 457. Countryside Agency, Cheltenham, England. 41 pp.
8. ↵
   Commission for Racial Equality (CRE). 2002. Statutory Code of Practice on the Duty to Promote Race Equality. Commission for Racial Equality, London. England. 76 pp.
9. ↵
   Common Ground. 1993. Tree Dressing Day Times. Common Ground, London, England. 8 pp.
10. ↵
    1. Fenton, J

    . 1986. Alien or native? ECOS 7(2):20–30.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Fonseca, M

    . 2002 Cultural differences in the workplace. Arborist News 11(1):21–22.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Fraser, E.D., and
    2. W.A. Kenney

    . 2000. Cultural background and landscape history as factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest. J. Arboric. 26(2):106–112.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Giddens, A

    . 2001. Sociology (4th ed.). Polity Press, Cambridge, UK. 750 pp.
14. ↵
    1. Goodwin, K

    . 2002. Plant a tree, end isolation. The Big Issue 28 November–4 December:29-31
15. ↵
    1. Iles, J.K

    . 1998. Inclusive urban and community forestry programs: Using all of your community’s cultural resources. J. Arboric. 24(6):316–320.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Johnston, M

    . 1985. Community forestry: A sociological approach to urban forestry. Arboric. J. 9:121–126.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Johnston, M

    . 1986. Community forestry: A question of priorities. Arboric. J. 10:95–100.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Johnston, M

    . 1989a. Glimpse of green in the Big Apple. Hortic. Week 206(21):32–33.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Hibbert, B. (Ed.)

    1. Johnston, M

    . 1989b. Involving the public. In Hibbert, B. (Ed.). Urban Forestry Practice. Forestry Commission Handbook 11. HMSO, UK.
20. ↵
    1. Johnston, M

    . 1994. Signposts to Peace. Hortic. Week 216(19):28–31.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Johnston, M

    . 1995. The Forest of Belfast: Healing the environment and the community. Arboric. J. 19:53–72.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Johnston, M

    . 2001. A review of the Black Country Urban Forest Millennium Programme, 1995-2001. Arboric. J. 26: 111–139.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Keith, M

    . 1992. Race, Riots and Policing: Lore and Disorder in a Multi-Racist Society. UCL Press, London. England. 280 pp.
24. ↵
    1. Knox, P., and
    2. S. Pinch

    . 2000. Urban Social Geography: An Introduction (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Harlow, UK. 479 pp.
25. ↵
    1. Kuhns, M.,
    2. H. Bragg, and
    3. D. Blahna

    . 2002. Involvement of women and minorities in the urban forestry profession. J. Arboric. 28(1):27–31.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Kuo, F

    . 2003. The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. J. Arboric. 29(3):148–155.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Kuo, F.E., and
    2. W.C. Sullivan

    . 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environ. Behav. 33(3):343–367.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Loukaitou-Sideris, A

    . 1995. Urban form and context: Cultural differentiation in the uses of urban parks. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 14:89–102.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Parris, L.R

    . 1991. The Hispanic perspective, pp 227–229. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Urban Forest Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
30. ↵
    1. Pincetl, S

    . 2002. Race, class, ethnicity and park and open space use: A literature review pointing to a need to reconceptualization. White paper, Sustainable Cities Program, University of California. 24 pp.
31. ↵
    1. Ricard, R.M

    . 1993. How important are minorities to tree programs? University of Connecticut Community Forestry Fact Sheet. West Hartford, CT. 3 pp
32. ↵
    1. Rishbeth, C

    . 2002. The Landscape of the Global Village. Landsc. Design 310:27–30.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Saltzstein, A

    . 2003. Governing America’s Urban Areas. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. 360 pp.
34. ↵
    1. Sando, J

    . 1991. The Native American viewpoint, pp 230–232. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Urban Forest Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
35. ↵
    1. Westphal, L

    . 2003. Urban greening and social benefits: A study of empowerment outcomes. J. Arboric. 29(3):137–147.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Wong, J

    . (no date). The ‘Native and Alien’ Issue—A discussion paper. Black Environment Network, Llanberis, Wales, UK. 5 pp.
37. ↵
    1. Wong, J

    . 2003. Power to the People. Landsc. Design 322:28–31.

    OpenUrl