Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Response of Cambial and Shoot Growth in Trees Treated with Paclobutrazol

Shuju Bai, William Chaney and Yadong Qi
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2004, 30 (3) 137-145; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2004.017
Shuju Bai
1Department of Computer Science, Southern University and A&M College, P.O. Box 9221, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
William Chaney
2Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, 715 West State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Yadong Qi
3Urban Forestry Program, Southern University and A&M College, P.O. Box 11288, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Annual and total shoot growth (cm) for 4 years and total reduction expressed as a percentage of untreated controls for white and red oak in Indiana untreated and treated in April 1995 with paclobutrazol using the soil drench method.

    TreatmentYear4-year totalPercentage reduction
    1995199619971998
    White oak
    Central leader
    Control42.9 a46.6 a41.1 a40.9 a170.5 a
    Treated39.0 a20.0 b  6.6 b10.5 b  76.1 b55
    Shoots in upper crown
    Control38.5 a36.9 a39.6 a31.3 a146.3 a
    Treated31.2 a14.6 b  7.0 b  8.1 b  60.9 b58
    Shoots in lower crown
    Control28.2 a34.1 a32.8 a26.6 a121.7 a
    Treated20.2 a  9.3 b  3.4 b  5.8 b  38.7 b68
    Red oak
    Central leader
    Control91.0 a51.3 a62.4 a45.4 a250.1 a
    Treated76.9 a26.3 b12.5 b14.9 b130.6 b48
    Shoots in upper crown
    Control72.5 a42.3 a40.6 a37.4 a192.8 a
    Treated67.4 a18.6 b  8.9 b12.3 b107.2 b44
    Shoots in lower crown
    Control44.0 a35.1 a31.6 a20.1 a130.8 a
    Treated51.5 a20.0 a  5.2 b  7.2 b  83.9 b36
    • Pairs of values followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Annual and total shoot growth (cm) for 3 years and total reduction expressed as a percentage of untreated controls of seven species of trees in Indiana untreated and treated in April 1996 with paclobutrazol using the soil injection method.

    TreatmentYear3-year totalPercentage reduction
    199619971998
    Black walnut
    Central leader
    Control27.5 a13.5 a7.5 a48.5 a
    Treated12.5 a  8.9 a6.8 a28.2 a42
    Lateral shoots
    Control10.0 a10.5 a8.2 a28.7 a
    Treated  7.0 a  5.6 a4.8 a17.4 a39
    Red oak
    Central leader
    Control71.7 a45.7 a31.2 a148.6 a
    Treated64.3 b31.3 b28.1 a123.7 a17
    Lateral shoots
    Control55.4 a23.4 a21.5 a100.3 a
    Treated40.1 b17.5 a16.2 a  73.8 a26
    Sweetgum
    Central leader
    Control51.5 a54.7 a67.0 a173.2 a
    Treated  0.8 b  0.3 b  0.3 b    1.4 b99
    Lateral shoots
    Control34.0 a27.7 a21.7 a83.4 a
    Treated  0.7 b  0.3 b  0.2 b  1.2 b99
    White ash
    Central leader
    Control44.8 a37.5 a37.5 a119.8 a
    Treated31.3 b26.3 b35.0 a  92.6 a23
    Lateral shoots
    Control31.0 a20.5 a15.2 a66.7 a
    Treated24.0 a17.5 a13.9 a55.4 a17
    White oak
    Central leader
    Control37.3 a32.0 a28.7 a98.0 a
    Treated18.2 b13.7 b20.7 a52.6 b46
    Lateral shoots
    Control41.7 a28.7 a32.8 a103.2 a
    Treated14.7 b10.0 b10.2 b  34.9 b66
    White pine
    Central leader
    Control95.3 a82.3 a89.8 a267.4 a
    Treated84.0 b48.0 b55.7 b187.7 b30
    Lateral shoots
    Control55.4 a46.5 a37.2 a139.1 a
    Treated50.0 a34.7 b28.6 b113.3 b19
    Yellow poplar
    Central leader
    Control53.7 a43.0 a63.3 a160.0 a
    Treated37.0 b44.1 a59.5 a140.6 a12
    Lateral shoots
    Control32.3 a28.3 a24.7 a85.3 a
    Treated21.8 b22.4 a18.6 a62.8 a26
    • Pairs of values followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Annual and total shoot growth (cm) for 2 years and total reduction expressed as a percentage of untreated controls of sweetgum and cherrybark oak in Louisiana untreated and treated in March 1997 with paclobutrazol using the soil drench method.

    TreatmentYear2-year totalPercentage reduction
    19971998
    Sweetgum
    Central leader
    Control83.5 a89.3 a172.8 a
    Treated  6.5 b  1.4 b    7.9 b95
    Lateral shoots
    Control33.3 a28.0 a61.3 a
    Treated  1.4 b  1.1 b  2.5 b96
    Cherrybark oak
    Central leader
    Control36.1 a30.0 a66.1 a
    Treated31.2 a  4.2 b35.4 b46
    Lateral shoots
    Control24.8 a25.0 a49.8 a
    Treated23.9 a  4.8 b28.7 b42
    • Pairs of values followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Annual xylem ring increment (mm) 50 cm from the ground line for white and red oak for the year prior to treatment and for 4 years after treatment with paclobutrazol in April 1995 using the soil drench method, with total reduction expressed as a percentage of untreated controls.

    TreatmentYearTotal 1995–98Percentage reduction
    PriorAfter treatment
    19941995199619971998
    White oak
    Control4.95 a4.43 a5.06 a4.50 a6.11 a20.10 a
    Treated5.30 a1.60 b0.99 b0.70 b0.71 b  4.00 b80
    Red oak
    Control6.19 a4.65 a4.65 a4.03 a5.57 a18.90 a
    Treated6.24 a2.68 b1.78 b1.37 b1.81 b  7.64 b60
    • Pairs of values followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Annual xylem ring increment (mm) for the year prior to treatment and for 3 years after treatment with paclobutrazol in April 1996 using the soil injection method on eight tree species growing in Indiana, with total reduction expressed as a percentage of untreated controls.

    TreatmentYearTotal 1996–98Percentage reduction
    PriorAfter treatment
    1995199619971998
    Black walnut
    Within crown
    Control1.36 a1.38 a1.06 a1.08 a3.52 a
    Treated0.82 a1.28 a0.99 a0.94 a3.21 a9
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control2.05 a2.44 a1.46 a1.67 a5.57 a
    Treated1.74 a1.54 a1.14 a1.40 a4.08 a27
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control1.86 a1.42 a1.25 a1.66 a4.33 a
    Treated2.06 a1.61 a1.05 a1.04 a3.70 a15
    European black alder
    Within crown
    Control2.06 a1.84 a1.46 a1.50 a4.80 a
    Treated2.59 a1.20 a1.11 a1.29 a3.60 a25
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control5.80 a5.00 a3.90 a6.27 a15.17 a
    Treated3.15 a2.16 b1.27 b2.40 b  5.83 b62
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control5.19 a3.85 a3.30 a4.45 a11.60 a
    Treated5.00 a3.25 a2.73 a2.25 b  8.23 a29
    Red oak
    Within crown
    Control3.14 a2.16 a2.07 a3.36 a7.59 a
    Treated4.54 a2.38 a1.80 a2.85 a7.03 a7
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control4.32 a2.82 a2.37 a3.38 a8.57 a
    Treated4.17 a2.23 a1.79 a2.60 a6.62 a23
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control5.87 a4.39 a3.39 a4.91 a12.69 a
    Treated5.97 a3.19 b2.04 a3.57 a  8.80 a31
    Sweetgum
    Within crown
    Control4.68 a4.23 a3.78 a4.26 a12.27 a
    Treated4.18 a1.99 b1.66 b1.54 b  5.19 b58
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control4.50 a4.42 a3.51 a3.58 a11.51 a
    Treated3.54 a2.46 b2.17 b2.07 a  6.70 b42
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control4.10 a4.44 a4.97 a4.93 a14.34 a
    Treated3.78 a3.37 b3.45 b4.13 a10.95 b24
    White ash
    Within crown
    Control1.55 a1.63 a1.95 a2.07 a5.65 a
    Treated1.09 a1.27 a1.32 a1.48 a4.07 a28
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control2.21 a2.11 a2.21 a2.15 a6.47 a
    Treated1.39 a1.62 a1.55 a1.66 a4.83 a25
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control2.03 a2.25 a1.92 a2.25 a6.42 a
    Treated1.67 a1.57 a1.30 a1.71 a4.58 a29
    White oak
    Within crown
    Control2.42 a2.17 a1.84 a2.68 a6.69 a
    Treated2.46 a1.08 a0.80 b0.97 b2.85 b57
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control3.02 a2.98 a2.69 a3.26 a8.93 a
    Treated2.30 a1.04 a0.90 b1.11 b3.05 b66
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control4.11 a2.94 a2.91 a4.36 a10.21 a
    Treated3.63 a1.40 a0.95 b1.16 b  3.51 b66
    White pine
    Within crown
    Control4.71 a4.95 a8.67 a10.50 a24.12 a
    Treated5.35 a5.67 a4.42 b  5.29 b15.38 b36
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control9.77 a9.05 a10.39 a10.77 a30.21 a
    Treated8.48 a8.79 a  8.42 b10.17 a27.38 a9
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control9.17 a11.32 a9.84 a12.08 a33.24 a
    Treated8.95 a  9.33 b8.22 a11.46 a29.01 a13
    Yellow poplar
    Within crown
    Control2.83 a2.64 a2.98 a3.65 a9.27 a
    Treated2.74 a1.92 a2.57 a3.83 a8.32 a10
    Mid-trunk (2—4 m high)
    Control3.28 a2.55 a2.71 a3.99 a9.25 a
    Treated2.68 a1.88 a2.33 a3.62 a7.83 a15
    Base of trunk (10 cm above ground line)
    Control2.47 a2.25 a2.20 a3.90 a8.35 a
    Treated2.25 a2.16 a2.63 a4.16 a8.95 a(−7)
    • Pairs of values for each set of control and treated trees followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Annual xylem ring increment (mm) for the year prior to treatment and for 2 years after treatment with paclobutrazol in March 1997 using the soil drench method for cherrybark oak and sweetgum growing in Louisiana, with total reduction expressed as a percentage of untreated controls.

    TreatmentYearTotal 1997–98Percentage reduction
    PriorAfter treatment
    199619971998
    Cherrybark oak
    Within crown (2–4 m high)
    Control2.00 a2.22 a1.82 a4.04 a
    Treated1.60 a1.06 b0.82 b1.88 b53
    At base of tree (10 cm above ground line)
    Control4.63 a5.86 a5.74 a11.60 a
    Treated4.21 a3.19 b1.89 b  5.08 b56
    Sweetgum
    Within crown (2–4 m high)
    Control1.75 a1.85 a0.99 a2.84 a
    Treated1.29 a1.52 b0.88 a2.40 a15
    At base of tree (10 cm above ground line)
    Control2.91 a1.83 a1.76 a3.59 a
    Treated2.01 a1.21 b1.34 a2.55 b29
    • Pairs of values followed by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 30 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 30, Issue 3
May 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response of Cambial and Shoot Growth in Trees Treated with Paclobutrazol
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Response of Cambial and Shoot Growth in Trees Treated with Paclobutrazol
Shuju Bai, William Chaney, Yadong Qi
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2004, 30 (3) 137-145; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2004.017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Response of Cambial and Shoot Growth in Trees Treated with Paclobutrazol
Shuju Bai, William Chaney, Yadong Qi
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2004, 30 (3) 137-145; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2004.017
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Linking Urban Greening and Community Engagement with Heat-Related Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review of the Literature
  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Paclobutrazol (PBZ)
  • growth retardant
  • cambial growth
  • annual shoot growth
  • xylem ring increment

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire