Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

A 10-Year Evaluation of the Performance of Four Elm Cultivars in California, U.S.

L.R. Costello, S.R. Scott and C.M. Drake
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 2004, 30 (2) 114-122; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2004.014
L.R. Costello
1University of California, 146 Jordan Ave., San Francisco, CA, 94118, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
S.R. Scott
2Urban Forester, City of Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
C.M. Drake
3Statistician, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Becker, H
    . 1996. New American elms restore stately trees. USDA Agric. Res. 44(7):4–8.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 1990. Dutch Elm Disease Project: 1990 Annual Report. Forest Pest Management Program. California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA.
  3. ↵
    1. Costello, L.R
    . 2002. Training young trees for structure and form. Tree Care Industry 13(7):48–54.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Costello, L.R.,
    2. S.R. Scott,
    3. J.D. Peterson, and
    4. C.J. Adams
    . 1990. Trunk banding to control elm leaf beetle. J. Arboric. 16(9):225–230.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Costello, L.R.,
    2. E.J. Perry,
    3. N.P. Matheny,
    4. J.M. Henry, and
    5. P.M. Geisel
    . 2003. Abiotic Disorders of Landscape Plants: A Diagnostic Guide. Publication #3420. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA. 242 pp.
  6. ↵
    1. Dreistadt, S.H., and
    2. D.L. Dahlsten
    . 1990. Relationships of temperature and elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) development and damage in the field. J. Econ. Entomol. 83:837–841.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Dunn, C.P. (Ed)
    . 2000. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
    1. Frankel, D
    . 2003. Urban Forester, City of Piedmont, CA (personal communication).
  8. ↵
    1. Greenfield, J
    . 1996. Dutch elm disease: What are California communities doing? Calif. Trees 7(1):1–4.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Hall, R.W
    . 1986. Preference and suitability of elms for adult elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 15:143–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Hall, R.W., and
    2. A.M. Townsend
    . 1987. Suitability of Ulmus wilsoniana, the ‘Urban’ elm, and their hybrids for the elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 16:1042–1044.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Hall, R.W.,
    2. A.M. Townsend, and
    3. J.H. Barger
    . 1987. Suitability of thirteen different host species for elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Environ. Hortic. 5:143–145.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Kuser, J., and
    2. N. Polanin
    . 2001. Comparative test of six DED-tolerant elms: A preliminary report on nursery performance. J. Arboric. 27(5):281–282.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Luck, R.F., and
    2. G.T. Scriven
    . 1979. The elm leaf beetle, Pyrrhalta luteola, in southern California; Its host preference and host impact. Environ. Entomol. 8:307–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Markham, L., and
    2. A. Haley
    . 1990. 1990 Annual Lab Report of the Forest Pest Management Program. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA.
  14. ↵
    1. Sticklen, M.B., and
    2. J.L. Sherald (Eds.)
    1. Smalley, E.B.,
    2. P.R. Guries, and
    3. D.T. Lester
    . 1993. American Liberty elm and beyond: Going from the impossible to the difficult, pp 26–45. In Sticklen, M.B., and J.L. Sherald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
  15. ↵
    1. Tidwell, T.E
    . 1982. Isolation of Ceratocystis ulmi from deep annual rings of elms in California. Plant Dis. 66(11):1016–1018.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Dunn, C.P. (Ed.)
    1. Townsend, A.M
    . 2000. USDA genetic research on elms, pp 271–278. In Dunn, C.P. (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
  17. ↵
    1. Townsend, A.M. and
    2. L.W. Douglass
    . 2001. Variation among American elm clones in long-term dieback, growth, and survival following Ophiostoma inoculation. J. Environ. Hortic. 19(2):100–103.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Townsend, A.M.,
    2. S.E. Bentz, and
    3. G.R. Johnson
    . 1995. Variation in response of selected American elm clones to Ophiostoma ulmi. J. Environ. Hortic. 13:126–128.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Townsend, A.M.,
    2. L.R. Schreiber,
    3. W.O. Masters, and
    4. S.E. Bentz
    . 1991a. ‘Frontier’ elm. HortScience 26:80–81.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Townsend, A.M.,
    2. L.R. Schreiber,
    3. W.O. Masters, and
    4. S.E. Bentz
    . 1991b. ‘Prospector’ elm. HortScience 26:81–82.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Ware, G.H
    . 1992. Elm breeding and improvement at the Morton Arboretum. Morton Arboret. Q. 28:846–849.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Dunn, C.P. (Ed.)
    1. Warren, K
    . 2000. The return of the elm, pp 341–348. In Dunn, C.P. (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 30 (2)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 30, Issue 2
March 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A 10-Year Evaluation of the Performance of Four Elm Cultivars in California, U.S.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
A 10-Year Evaluation of the Performance of Four Elm Cultivars in California, U.S.
L.R. Costello, S.R. Scott, C.M. Drake
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2004, 30 (2) 114-122; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2004.014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A 10-Year Evaluation of the Performance of Four Elm Cultivars in California, U.S.
L.R. Costello, S.R. Scott, C.M. Drake
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2004, 30 (2) 114-122; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2004.014
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Dutch elm disease
  • elm cultivars
  • disease resistance
  • elm leaf beetle
  • pest tolerance

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire