Residents’ Opinions on the Value of Street Trees Depending on Tree Location

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Coley, R.L.,
   2. F.E. Kuo, and
   3. W.C. Sullivan

   . 1997. Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environ. Behav. 294:468–492.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Daily, G.C. (Ed.)

   1997. Nature’s Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC. 392 pp.
3. ↵
   1. DeAraujo, M.N

   . 1994. Urban Tree Attitudes and Comparison of Three Survey Methods in the City of Curitiba, Pr, Brazil. Thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
4. ↵
   1. Fischer, H.W

   . 1996. The Sociologist’s Statistical Tools. University Press of America, Latham, MD. 242 pp.
5. ↵
   1. Hull, B

   . 1992. How the public values urban forests. J. Arboric. 18(2):98–101.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Schroeder, H., and
   2. S. Ruffolo

   . 1996. Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb. J. Arboric. 22(1):35–43.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Smardon, R.C

   . 1988. Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:85–106.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Sommer, R.,
   2. H. Guenther, and
   3. P. Barker

   . 1990. Surveying householder response to street trees. Landscape J. 9(2):79–85.

   OpenUrl
9. State College Borough Municipal Tree Plan: 1993–1998. 1993. State College, PA.
10. ↵
    1. Summit, J., and
    2. E.G. McPherson

    . 1998. Residential tree planting and care: A study of attitudes and behavior in Sacramento, California. J. Arboric. 24(2):89–96.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Ulrich, R

    . 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing. 1990. Tape file 1A, 1990. Washington, DC.
13. ↵
    1. Voelkl, K., and
    2. S. Gerber

    . 1999. Using SPSS for Windows. Springer, New York, NY. 264 pp.