Iowa, U.S., Communities Benefit From A Tree-Planting Program: Characteristics of Recently Planted Trees

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Akbari, H.,
   2. A. Rosenfeld, and
   3. H. Taha

   . 1990. Summer heat islands, urban trees, and white surfaces. ASHRAE Trans. 96:1381–1388.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Baldocchi, D

   . 1988. A multi-layer model for estimating sulfur dioxide deposition to a deciduous oak forest canopy. Atmos. Environ. 22:869–884.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Baldocchi, D.,
   2. B. Hicks, and
   3. P. Camara

   . 1987. A copy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces. Atmos. Environ. 21:91–101.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Barker, P

   . 1975. Ordinance control of street trees. J. Arboric. 11:212–215.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Buckstrup, M.J., and
   2. N.L. Bassuk

   . 2000. Transplanting success of balled-and-burlapped versus bare-root trees in the urban landscape. J. Arboric. 26(6):298–308.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Clark, J.,
   2. N. Matheny,
   3. G. Cross, and
   4. V. Wake

   . 1997. A model of urban forest sustainability. J. Arboric. 23:17–30.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Dwyer, J.F.,
   2. D.J. Nowak, and
   3. M.H. Noble

   . 2003. Sustaining urban forests. J. Arboric. 29(1):49–55.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Frelich, L

   . 1992. Predicting Dimensional Relationships for Twin Cities Shade Trees. Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 33 pp.
9. ↵
   1. Groninger, J.,
   2. D. Close, and
   3. C. Basman

   . 2002. Can small, rural communities practice urban forestry? J. For. 100(1):23–28.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Heisler, G.M

    . 1986. Energy savings with trees. J. Arboric. 12:113–125.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    Iowa Department of Natural Resources. 1996. A Vision for Iowa’s Forests 1996–2001: Forest Resources Plan of Action. Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Des Moines, IA. 19 pp.
12. ↵
    Iowa League of Municipalities. 1995. Cities and Populations as of June 1995. Iowa League of Municipalities, Des Moines, IA. 16 pp.
13. ↵
    1. Jo, H.K., and
    2. E.G. McPherson

    . 1995. Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. J. Environ. Manage. 45:109–133.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Kjelgren, R.K., and
    2. J.R. Clark

    . 1992. Microclimates and tree growth in three urban spaces. J. Environ. Hortic. 10(3):139–145.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Magurran, A.E

    . 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G

    . 1994. Using urban forests for energy efficiency and carbon storage. J. For. 92(10):36–41.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. J.R. Simpson

    . 1995. Shade trees as a demand-side resource. Home Energ. 12(2):11–17.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. J.R. Simpson

    1999. Carbon Dioxide Reduction Through Urban Forestry: Guidelines for Professional and Volunteer Tree Planters. Gen Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-171, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
19. ↵
    1. Miller, R.H., and
    2. R.W. Miller

    . 1991. Planting survival of selected street tree taxa. J. Arboric. 17:185–191.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 1991. Carbon Dioxide Budgets in Minnesota and Recommendations on Reducing Net Emissions with Trees. Report to the Minnesota Legislature.
21. ↵
    1. Murray, F.J.,
    2. L. Marsh, and
    3. P.A. Bradford

    . 1994. New York State Energy Plan, Vol. II: Issue Reports. New York State Energy Office, Albany, NY.
22. 1. Neal, B.A., and
    2. T.H. Whitlow

    . 1997. Using tree growth rates to evaluate urban tree planting specifications. J. Environ. Hortic. 15(2):115–118.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J

    . 1993. Atmospheric carbon reduction by urban trees. J. Environ. Manage. 37:207–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. D.J. Nowak, and
    3. R.A. Rowntree (eds.)

    1. Nowak, D.J

    . 1994. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest, Ch. 6. In McPherson, E.G., D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree (eds.). Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. NE-GTR 186, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA.
25. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J

    . 1996. Estimating leaf area and leaf biomass of open-grown deciduous urban trees. For. Sci. 42:504–507.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. D.E. Crane

    . 2000. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) model: Quantifying urban forest structure and functions, pp 714–720. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-212, USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
27. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. D.E. Crane

    . 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ. Pollut. 116(3):381–389.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane,
    3. J.C. Stevens, and
    4. M. Ibarra

    . 2002. Brooklyn’s Urban Forest. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-290. 107 pp.
29. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. J.R. McBride, and
    3. R.A. Beatty

    . 1990. Newly planted street tree growth and mortality. J. Arboric. 16:124–129.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Gryning, S.E., and
    2. N. Chaumerliac (eds.)

    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. P.J. McHale,
    3. M. Ibarra,
    4. D. Crane,
    5. J. Stevens, and
    6. C. Luley

    . 1998. Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution, pp 399–407. In Gryning, S.E., and N. Chaumerliac (eds.). Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XII. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
31. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. J.C. Stevens,
    3. S.M. Sisinni, and
    4. C.J. Luley

    . 2002. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Arboric. 28:113–122.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Richards, N

    . 1993. Reasonable guidelines for street tree diversity. J. Arboric. 19:344–349.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Rhoades, R.W., and
    2. R. J. Stipes

    . 1999. Growth of trees on the Virginia Tech campus in response to various factors. J. Arboric. 25(4):211–215.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Rhoads, A.F.,
    2. P.W. Meyer, and
    3. R. Sanfelippo

    . 1981. Performance of urban street trees evaluated. J. Arboric. 7(5):127–132.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Sampson, R.N., and
    2. D. Hair (eds.)

    1. Sampson, R.N.,
    2. G.A. Moll, and
    3. J.J. Kielbaso

    , 1992. Opportunities to increase urban forests and the potential impacts on carbon storage and conservation. In Sampson, R.N., and D. Hair (eds.). Forests and Global Change: Opportunities for Increasing Forest Cover, Vol. 1. American Forests, Washington, DC.
36. ↵
    1. Sarkovich, M

    . 2003. Shade Tree Program: Sacramento Municipal Utility District. America’s Best, ACEEE. www.aceee.org/utility/7bsmudshadetree.pdf (accessed 7/30/03).
37. ↵
    SAS Institute, Inc. 1996. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 6.12. Cary, NC.
38. ↵
    Trees Forever. 1995. IES Utilities, Inc.: Branching Out Report. Trees Forever, Marion, IA.
39. ↵
    1. Vitosh, M.A

    . 1998. General Assessment of Urban and Community Forestry Activities in Iowa 1994 to 1996. M.S. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 53 pp.
40. ↵
    1. Vitosh, M. A., and
    2. J. R. Thompson

    . 2000. Iowa communities benefit from an externally funded tree-planting program. J. Arboric. 29:114–119.

    OpenUrl