Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Crew Evaluation

Calvin Simmons
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 1977, 3 (3) 57-58; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1977.015
Calvin Simmons
Houston Lighting and Power Co., Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The function of Houston Lighting and Power’ Company’s Right-of-Way Clearance Department is to obtain and maintain adequate clearance on company transmission and distribution systems, while adhering to acceptable and efficient tree trimming methods, sound economical principles and with customer approval and consent.

To follow these dictates an in-depth crew evaluation study should be available to your company; however, at present we do not have this in-depth evaluation capability.

In past years our evaluation was based on the contractor’s daily and weekly time report which were periodically field checked for accuracy. Computations were made at six month intervals and an attempt was made to evaluate crew performance. This was rather like setting the fox to guard the chickens.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Company foresters now use an abbreviated form that is filled out each time a crew is visited in the field. His work is graded as to quality and quantity, the forester’s impression of crew ability, neatness, how well their supervisor has kept up with their progress and with our instructions for line clearing.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

This information is placed with the contractor’s daily and weekly time reports submitted by this particular foreman into a log which is kept of the work area being trimmed. At monthly intervals, a tabulation is made of the number of hours worked and trees trimmed or removed. Cost per tree and hours per tree are then developed from this tabulation.

Starting in 1971 a need developed for more supervision above the foreman level, and consequently our line clearing contractors were instructed to add a field supervisor for each ten crews. This proved to be an excessive number of crews and was lowered to eight per supervisor. We now appear to have the right balance.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

CIRCUIT MAINTENANCE - 1971 THRU 1975

Time required to trim or remove trees began to decline and is stabilizing at an hour per tree. Better supervision, aerial lifts, small power saws in the trees and a common dump have all contributed to this time lowering with the biggest plus to be given supervision.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

But who supervises the supervision?

Each company forester will have under his direction one-third of the contractor’s supervisors along with the attendant line clearing crews. These groups will remain stable for six months and then an evaluation will be made comparing group to group, supervisor to supervisor, forester to forester. We feel that management can at least get a better handle on the ability of all its supervisory personnel.

To bolster our findings, we are looking over all available crew evaluation material we can obtain by hook or crook; talking with any individual who professes an interest in the matter and hopefully, by our next meeting, we will have developed an accurate in-depth evaluation capability for the Gulf Coast area.

Footnotes

Listen
  • ↵1 Presented at the annual conference of The International Society of Arboriculture in St. Louis, Missouri in August, 1976.

  • © 1977, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 3, Issue 3
March 1977
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Crew Evaluation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Crew Evaluation
Calvin Simmons
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1977, 3 (3) 57-58; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1977.015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Crew Evaluation
Calvin Simmons
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1977, 3 (3) 57-58; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1977.015
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire