Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Urban Tree Research in the South

Donald L. Ham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) December 1977, 3 (12) 226-228; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1977.3.12.226
Donald L. Ham
Department of Forestry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Urban trees, shade trees, ornamental trees, landscape trees, urban forestry — regardless of the terminology, trees in close proximity to man’s living environment are an important asset. However, this variable terminology is, in itself, one of the greatest obstacles to obtaining information on urban tree research in the South. Coupled with, and perhaps one of the major reasons for, the variable terminology are the many disciplines and research facilities conducting investigations pertaining to urban trees.

Disciplines involved with urban tree research include forestry, horticulture, entomology, plant pathology, agronomy, recreation, agricultural economics, genetics, biology, and agricultural engineering. Research is being conducted by private companies, private and state universities, experiment stations, and several state and federal agencies. Such diversification can only lead to confusion and over-sight when attempting to identify current urban tree research.

This compilation of current or recently completed research should not be viewed as being complete. With sufficient interest, it could become the nucleus for a more comprehensive listing.

Urban tree research in the South can be categorized into eight general subject areas. Project titles and/or brief descriptions of research, principal investigators), and institutions are listed below.

  1. Pathology

    1. Antibiotic injections control elm phloem necrosis, T.H. Filer, Jr.; Forest Service, U.S.D.A., Stoneville, MS.

    2. Role of various fungi and environmental conditions in live oak decline and possible methods of control; R. Lewis, Jr. and T.H. Filer, Jr.; Forest Service, U.S.D.A., Stoneville, MS.

    3. Destruction by canker stain in midsouth sycamore stands; F.I. McCracken; Forest Service, U.S.D.A., Stoneville, MS.

    4. Lethal yellowing of palms; R.E. McCoy, D.L. Thomas, and J.H. Tsai; University of Florida ARC.

    5. Endothia canker on pin oak and live oak; R.J. Stipes; Virginia Polytech. and S.U.

    6. Mimosa wilt—fungus biology; R.J. Stipes; Virginia Polytech. and S.U.

    7. Evaluation of systemic fungicide(s) and different application techniques as treatments for Dutch elm disease; R.J. Stipes; Virginia Polytech. and S.U.

    8. Mimosa wilt—fungus biology; W.J. Stambaugh and J. English; Duke University

    9. White pine “sudden death”; W. Witcher; Clemson University

    10. Relationship between environmental stress and pitch canker of landscape pines; W. Witcher and B.R. Fraedrich; Clemson University.

  2. Environmental effects

    1. Effects of excessive soil fill associated with home construction; W.J. Stambaugh and P. Gruber; Duke University.

    2. Effects of fertilization in alleviating air pollution; D.L. Ham and W. Witcher, Clemson University

    3. Time-lapse photography of tree conditions in newly developed residential area; J.R. McGraw; N.C. State University.

  3. Entomology

    1. Field observations on the seasonal behavior of the hemlock woolly aphid; J. Weidhaas; Virginia Polytech. and S.U.

    2. Evaluation of Disparlure formulations for gypsy moth control; C.W. McComb; Maryland Dept. of Agriculture

    3. Evaluation of Orthene Medicaps for control of eastern tent caterpillar and fall webworm; A.I. Walker; Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories

  4. Tree breeding and selection

    1. Cytogenetics, breeding, and evaluation of shade trees; F.S. Santamour, Jr.; U.S. National Arboretum

    2. Field evaluation and observation of new shade tree selections; P. Normandy; Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories

    3. New landscape plants for Texas; E.L. McWilliams; Texas A&M

    4. Factor affecting the propagation, production, establishment, and maintenance of urban trees; C.E. Whitcomb; Oklahoma State University

    5. Evaluation of flowering fruit trees for the urban landscape; R.P. Lane; Georgia Agric. Extension

    6. Propagation and evaluation of ornamental trees for use in Georgia; T.S. Davis; Georgia Agric. Exp. Station

    7. Factors affecting the desirability of forest trees for landscaping; T.S. Davis; Georgia Agric. Exp. Stationn

    8. Shade tree cultivars; H. Van de Werken; University of Tennessee

  5. Influence on urban environments

    1. An ecological systems approach to community noise abatement; B.K. Huang; N.C. State University

  6. Social aspects

    1. Substitutability of urban open space, for forest and rural areas; H.K. Cordell; N.C. State University

  7. Inventory

    1. Time-interval multiband remote sensing fof analyzing urban forested areas; J.O. Lammi; N.C. State University

  8. Economics aspects

    1. Factors affecting utilization and expansion potential for ornamental plants and turf; T.D. Phillips, C.O. Box and L.A. Estes, Jr.; Mississippi State University; and M.B. Badenhop; University of Tennessee

This limited list is indicative of the difficulty in obtaining research information, a lack of urban tree research in the South or both. Success in retrieving current research information on urban trees appears to depend on several factors:

  1. A personal knowledge of on-going projects.

  2. An awareness of individuals involved with urban tree research.

  3. A comprehensive ability to utilize computerized information retrieval systems.

Success in using the first two approaches is time consuming and largely limited by the interests and professional discipline of the inquirer. Very excellent research of individuals that are not widely known is often overlooked as a result. The computerized retrieval system appears ideal. In an attempt to have as complete a research listing as possible for this presentation, I made a very broad, comprehensive (I thought) request through the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Current Research Information System. I received a list of ten research projects, eight of which were pertinent!

What is the solution? Obviously, a clearinghouse for current research information is needed, but the means of establishing a workable system is not a readily evident. One possibility would be to have one appropriate researcher or extension employee in each state compile and maintain a comprehensive research list for his state. If the Forest Service initiates an active urban forestry research program, it may develop a mechanism for compiling a general list of pertinent research projects. Some type of research information clearinghouse needs to be established soon. If we wait for the perfect system, we will never start.

Do we need more research? Yes! Our knowledge of tree genetics and selection, maintenance, protection, pests, soil-water-air relationships, utilization, and social and environmental benefits is still in its infancy. In addition, we cannot depend totally on research from other regions of the country. For example, tree species, pest problems, soils, and weather conditions vary from other areas of the country and even within the southern region.

General areas warranting investigation include:

  1. Physiological and environmental stresses — The effects of air pollution, construction, heavy clay soils, salt spray, and drought are only a few examples.

  2. Tree fertilization — How does fertilization affect susceptibility to insects and disease organisms? What are the best formulations and application techniques for various soil types?

  3. Pest control — The basic biology of many tree pests is poorly understood. New control materials and application techniques are needed.

  4. Tree selection — Coordinate tree selection programs.

  5. New diagnostic equipment.

  6. Social and recreational aspects.

Urban tree research in the South is needed and justified, and the expertise is available. Our efforts must be expanded and coordinated. Research is expensive, however. As professionals, each of us must be willing to persuade legislatures, foundations, private companies, and other funding agencies of the necessity of arboricultural research. Urbanization and population in the South are expanding at breakneck rates. Research can enable the arboriculture profession to meet the challenge of this growth. Each of you can be instrumental in the growth of arboricultural research!

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Presented at the Southern Chapter meeting of the International Society of Arboriculture in March 1977.

  • © 1977, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 3, Issue 12
December 1977
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Urban Tree Research in the South
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Urban Tree Research in the South
Donald L. Ham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Dec 1977, 3 (12) 226-228; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1977.3.12.226

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Urban Tree Research in the South
Donald L. Ham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Dec 1977, 3 (12) 226-228; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1977.3.12.226
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire