Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Evaluation of Extraction Force for Wooden Guy Anchors

E. Thomas Smiley, Elden LeBrun and Elizabeth Gilbert
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 2003, 29 (5) 295-297; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.2003.29.5.295
E. Thomas Smiley
1Arboriculture Researcher, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, 13678 Hamilton Road, Charlotte, NC 28278, U.S. and Adjunct Professor, Clemson University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Elden LeBrun
2Research Technician, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, Charlotte, NC, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Gilbert
3Graduate Student, Myerscough College, Lancashire, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Wooden stakes are used to anchor guy lines on many newly transplanted trees. It has been recommended that the angle of the stake be either in-line with the guy (45 degrees toward the tree) or at right angles to the guy (45 degrees from horizontal away from the tree). This trial was conducted to determine which, if either, of these directions will provide the maximum amount of resistance to extraction. Stakes were driven into the soil at two angles and vertically into the soil then were extracted using a measured force. There was no significant difference in force required to extract the stakes driven in-line with the guy or at a right angle to it. There was a significant difference (p <. 05) between angled stakes and those driven straight into the soil. The force required for extraction of the stake driven vertically was more than twice that of the angle-driven stakes. It was hypothesized that the differences in extraction force were due to soil disruption that occurs when driving stakes into the soil. For maximum strength, it is recommended that wooden stakes be driven vertically into the soil.

Key Words
  • Windthrow
  • staking
  • transplanting
  • guying

Large transplanted trees that are prone to root failure due to wind or vandalism are often guyed for support for a year or more following transplanting. Guying is also used to support “righted” trees after they fail from wind or other reasons. Anchors that fasten guys need to stay in the ground during all normally encountered wind conditions and resist other forces that act on the tree. Pull-out failures have been observed during thunderstorms (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Wooden stakes were pulled out of the soil as a result of thunderstorm winds on these willow oaks (Quercus phellos) in Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.

One of the most common guy systems is a wire or rope looped around the trunk and run to a wooden stake anchor. Wooden stakes are much less expensive than steel stakes or patented steel anchors. They also have the advantage of easier extraction than steel anchors or are biodegradable if left in the soil. Improving the wooden stake anchor system can allow the use of less expensive materials to achieve the same results as more expensive materials.

Wooden stakes should be driven into the ground at an angle that provides the greatest resistance to extraction so that pull-out is less likely to occur. However, there is no published research on the strongest angle for driving tree stakes. Two stake angles have been commonly recommended for use with trees: driving the stake at an angle of 90 degrees to the guy (equal to about 45 degrees from horizontal, away from the tree) (Harris et al. 1998) and inline with the guy (about 45 degrees from horizontal, toward the tree) (Watson and Himelick 1997).

From the anchor, the guy is run to the tree trunk. The recommended angle for the guy is typically 45 degrees from horizontal, but the guy is often installed at a steeper angle of 55 or 60 degrees (Watson and Himelick 1997; Harris et al. 1998).

This trial was conducted to determine which, if either, of these directions provides better resistance to wooden stake extraction. Since it is difficult to simulate the dynamic action of trees responding to wind, a steady force was used that more closely simulates the constant pull that vandals might exert on tree trunks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wooden stakes, 3.5 by 2.2 by 40 cm long were driven into the soil so that approximately 10 cm remained above the soil surface. Soil in the test area was a sandy clay loam soil (Cecil B) with a moisture level of 6.2% and soil bulk density of 1.6 mg/m3. Stakes were spaced far enough apart so that soil disruption from pulling one stake out of the soil would not affect any other stakes.

Stakes were driven at one of three angles: 45 degrees toward the tree, 45 degrees away from the tree, or vertically (90 degrees) into the soil (Figure 2). The number of stakes tested at each angle were 40, 30, and 40, respectively. Stakes were extracted the same day that they were driven into the soil.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Stakes were driven at three angles—45 degrees toward the tree, straight into the soil, or 45 degrees away from the tree.

A Dillon 1,800 kg peak recording mechanical dynamometer (Weight-Tronix, Inc., Fairmont, MN) and block was attached to a large tree at a height that would provide an angle of pull or either 45 or 55 degrees from horizontal. A line was run from the stake through the block to a truckmounted winch. Stakes were pulled until they came out of the soil. Peak dynamometer readings were divided by two to determine the force required for extraction. Fifty stakes were pulled at a cable angle of 55 degrees, and 60 were pulled at an angle of 45 degrees.

Mean force required for extraction was statistically compared using an Analysis of Variance and the Student- Newman-Keuls separation of means.

RESULTS

Fracturing of the soil was noticed above the stakes driven either 45 degrees toward the tree or 45 degrees away from the tree. No soil disruption was noticed when stakes were driven vertically into the soil.

Mean extraction forces (measured in newtons, and showing standard deviations) for a cable pull angle of 45 degrees were 961 N, s.d. 405 (216 lb, s.d. 91); 1,157 N, s.d. 378 (260 lb; s.d. 85); and 2,390 N, s.d. 903 (537 lb; s.d. 203) for stake angles of 45 degrees toward the tree, 45 degrees away from the tree, and vertical, respectively (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Force required to extract wooden stakes driven at one of three angles (45 degrees toward the tree, 45 degrees away from the tree, or straight into the soil) and pulled at an angle or either 45 or 55 degrees from horizontal, from a sandy clay loam soil (1 lb = 4.45 N).

For a cable pull angle of 55 degrees, mean extraction forces were 886 N, s.d. 307 (199 lb, s.d. 69); 899 N, s.d. 347 (202 lb, s.d. 78); and 2,078 N, s.d. 1,558 (467 lb, s.d. 350), respectively.

Combined mean extraction force for stakes driven either 45 degrees toward the tree or 45 degrees away from the tree was slightly over 890 N (200 lb); for vertically driven stakes, it was approximately 2,225 N (500 lb). There was no significant difference in force required to extract the stakes driven at either 45 degree angle. There was a significant difference (p < .05) between both 45 angles and the stakes driven straight into the soil. There were no significant differences based on angle of pull regardless of stake angle.

DISCUSSION

The mean force required for extraction of the stake driven vertically was more than twice that of the angle-driven stakes. This fact is most likely due to the disruption of the soil structure that occurs when driving the stakes. When stakes are driven at an angle, they tend to lift and fracture the soil. The disturbed soil has less holding power than nondisturbed or compacted soil. When stakes are driven vertically into the soil, less soil disruption was observed. The soil surrounding vertically driven stakes is most likely compacted in the directions away from the stake.

When staking trees, it is desirable for the guy system to have the maximum possible strength with the materials used in order to resist tree failure under high wind conditions or with vandalism. This study found that the commonly recommended angles for driving wooden stakes into the soil have less resistance to extraction than a third option. This additional strength comes at no additional cost in materials or labor required to install the stakes.

A wind resistance study using 6.5 to 7.6 cm caliper ash (Fraxinus) trees exposed to a 22 m/s (50 mph) wind had a wind load in excess of 890 N (200 lb) (Smiley et al. 2000). One tree in the study experienced a force of 890 N in an 18 m/s (40 mph) wind. It was estimated that it would take a wind speed of 45 m/s (45 mph) to exceed 1,623 N (365 lb). Relating these numbers to this study, an angled stake would be able to support a typical 6.5 to 7.6 cm caliper ash to about 22 m/s, while a vertically driven stake would support the tree to in excess of 45 m/s. Thunderstorms often produce winds that exceed 22 m/s, but rarely do they exceed 45 m/s.

This study was conducted under dry soil conditions. With more soil moisture, soil disruptions caused by driving stakes in at an angle may be different. Additional testing of stake extraction forces in different soil textures and with different moisture conditions should be conducted to verify the results presented.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Donnie Merritt for the drawings, Tom Martin and Kelly Marshall for manuscript review, and Bruce R. Fraedrich, Director of the Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories.

  • © 2003, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Harris, R.W.,
    2. J.R. Clark, and
    3. N.P. Matheny
    . 1998. Arboriculture: Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 687 pp.
  2. ↵
    1. Smiley, E.T.,
    2. A. Key, and
    3. C. Greco
    . 2000. Root barriers and windthrow potential. J. Arboric. 26(4):213–217.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Watson, G.W., and
    2. E.B. Himelick
    . 1997. Principles and Practice of Planting Trees and Shrubs. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign IL. 200 pp.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 29 (5)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 29, Issue 5
September 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Extraction Force for Wooden Guy Anchors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Extraction Force for Wooden Guy Anchors
E. Thomas Smiley, Elden LeBrun, Elizabeth Gilbert
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2003, 29 (5) 295-297; DOI: 10.48044/joa.2003.29.5.295

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Extraction Force for Wooden Guy Anchors
E. Thomas Smiley, Elden LeBrun, Elizabeth Gilbert
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2003, 29 (5) 295-297; DOI: 10.48044/joa.2003.29.5.295
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Windthrow
  • staking
  • Transplanting
  • guying

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire