Abstract
Wooden stakes are used to anchor guy lines on many newly transplanted trees. It has been recommended that the angle of the stake be either in-line with the guy (45 degrees toward the tree) or at right angles to the guy (45 degrees from horizontal away from the tree). This trial was conducted to determine which, if either, of these directions will provide the maximum amount of resistance to extraction. Stakes were driven into the soil at two angles and vertically into the soil then were extracted using a measured force. There was no significant difference in force required to extract the stakes driven in-line with the guy or at a right angle to it. There was a significant difference (p <. 05) between angled stakes and those driven straight into the soil. The force required for extraction of the stake driven vertically was more than twice that of the angle-driven stakes. It was hypothesized that the differences in extraction force were due to soil disruption that occurs when driving stakes into the soil. For maximum strength, it is recommended that wooden stakes be driven vertically into the soil.
Large transplanted trees that are prone to root failure due to wind or vandalism are often guyed for support for a year or more following transplanting. Guying is also used to support “righted” trees after they fail from wind or other reasons. Anchors that fasten guys need to stay in the ground during all normally encountered wind conditions and resist other forces that act on the tree. Pull-out failures have been observed during thunderstorms (Figure 1).
One of the most common guy systems is a wire or rope looped around the trunk and run to a wooden stake anchor. Wooden stakes are much less expensive than steel stakes or patented steel anchors. They also have the advantage of easier extraction than steel anchors or are biodegradable if left in the soil. Improving the wooden stake anchor system can allow the use of less expensive materials to achieve the same results as more expensive materials.
Wooden stakes should be driven into the ground at an angle that provides the greatest resistance to extraction so that pull-out is less likely to occur. However, there is no published research on the strongest angle for driving tree stakes. Two stake angles have been commonly recommended for use with trees: driving the stake at an angle of 90 degrees to the guy (equal to about 45 degrees from horizontal, away from the tree) (Harris et al. 1998) and inline with the guy (about 45 degrees from horizontal, toward the tree) (Watson and Himelick 1997).
From the anchor, the guy is run to the tree trunk. The recommended angle for the guy is typically 45 degrees from horizontal, but the guy is often installed at a steeper angle of 55 or 60 degrees (Watson and Himelick 1997; Harris et al. 1998).
This trial was conducted to determine which, if either, of these directions provides better resistance to wooden stake extraction. Since it is difficult to simulate the dynamic action of trees responding to wind, a steady force was used that more closely simulates the constant pull that vandals might exert on tree trunks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Wooden stakes, 3.5 by 2.2 by 40 cm long were driven into the soil so that approximately 10 cm remained above the soil surface. Soil in the test area was a sandy clay loam soil (Cecil B) with a moisture level of 6.2% and soil bulk density of 1.6 mg/m3. Stakes were spaced far enough apart so that soil disruption from pulling one stake out of the soil would not affect any other stakes.
Stakes were driven at one of three angles: 45 degrees toward the tree, 45 degrees away from the tree, or vertically (90 degrees) into the soil (Figure 2). The number of stakes tested at each angle were 40, 30, and 40, respectively. Stakes were extracted the same day that they were driven into the soil.
A Dillon 1,800 kg peak recording mechanical dynamometer (Weight-Tronix, Inc., Fairmont, MN) and block was attached to a large tree at a height that would provide an angle of pull or either 45 or 55 degrees from horizontal. A line was run from the stake through the block to a truckmounted winch. Stakes were pulled until they came out of the soil. Peak dynamometer readings were divided by two to determine the force required for extraction. Fifty stakes were pulled at a cable angle of 55 degrees, and 60 were pulled at an angle of 45 degrees.
Mean force required for extraction was statistically compared using an Analysis of Variance and the Student- Newman-Keuls separation of means.
RESULTS
Fracturing of the soil was noticed above the stakes driven either 45 degrees toward the tree or 45 degrees away from the tree. No soil disruption was noticed when stakes were driven vertically into the soil.
Mean extraction forces (measured in newtons, and showing standard deviations) for a cable pull angle of 45 degrees were 961 N, s.d. 405 (216 lb, s.d. 91); 1,157 N, s.d. 378 (260 lb; s.d. 85); and 2,390 N, s.d. 903 (537 lb; s.d. 203) for stake angles of 45 degrees toward the tree, 45 degrees away from the tree, and vertical, respectively (Figure 3).
For a cable pull angle of 55 degrees, mean extraction forces were 886 N, s.d. 307 (199 lb, s.d. 69); 899 N, s.d. 347 (202 lb, s.d. 78); and 2,078 N, s.d. 1,558 (467 lb, s.d. 350), respectively.
Combined mean extraction force for stakes driven either 45 degrees toward the tree or 45 degrees away from the tree was slightly over 890 N (200 lb); for vertically driven stakes, it was approximately 2,225 N (500 lb). There was no significant difference in force required to extract the stakes driven at either 45 degree angle. There was a significant difference (p < .05) between both 45 angles and the stakes driven straight into the soil. There were no significant differences based on angle of pull regardless of stake angle.
DISCUSSION
The mean force required for extraction of the stake driven vertically was more than twice that of the angle-driven stakes. This fact is most likely due to the disruption of the soil structure that occurs when driving the stakes. When stakes are driven at an angle, they tend to lift and fracture the soil. The disturbed soil has less holding power than nondisturbed or compacted soil. When stakes are driven vertically into the soil, less soil disruption was observed. The soil surrounding vertically driven stakes is most likely compacted in the directions away from the stake.
When staking trees, it is desirable for the guy system to have the maximum possible strength with the materials used in order to resist tree failure under high wind conditions or with vandalism. This study found that the commonly recommended angles for driving wooden stakes into the soil have less resistance to extraction than a third option. This additional strength comes at no additional cost in materials or labor required to install the stakes.
A wind resistance study using 6.5 to 7.6 cm caliper ash (Fraxinus) trees exposed to a 22 m/s (50 mph) wind had a wind load in excess of 890 N (200 lb) (Smiley et al. 2000). One tree in the study experienced a force of 890 N in an 18 m/s (40 mph) wind. It was estimated that it would take a wind speed of 45 m/s (45 mph) to exceed 1,623 N (365 lb). Relating these numbers to this study, an angled stake would be able to support a typical 6.5 to 7.6 cm caliper ash to about 22 m/s, while a vertically driven stake would support the tree to in excess of 45 m/s. Thunderstorms often produce winds that exceed 22 m/s, but rarely do they exceed 45 m/s.
This study was conducted under dry soil conditions. With more soil moisture, soil disruptions caused by driving stakes in at an angle may be different. Additional testing of stake extraction forces in different soil textures and with different moisture conditions should be conducted to verify the results presented.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Donnie Merritt for the drawings, Tom Martin and Kelly Marshall for manuscript review, and Bruce R. Fraedrich, Director of the Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories.
- © 2003, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.