Social Aspects of Urban Forestry: Urban Greening and Social Benefits: A Study of Empowerment Outcomes

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Amacher, R.C., and
   2. H.H. Ulbrich

   . 1986. Principles of Economics. South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH. 913 pp.
2. ↵
   1. Rodbell, P.D.

   1. Bouza, A.V.

   1989. Trees and crime prevention, pp 31–32. In Rodbell, P.D. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Fourth Urban Forestry Conference: Making Our Cities Safe for Trees. American Forests, Washington, DC.
3. ↵
   1. Cackowski, J.M.

   1999. The Restorative Effects of Nature: Implications for Driver Anger and Frustration. Master’s Thesis. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
4. ↵
   1. Chenoweth, R.

   1984. Visitor employed photography: A potential tool for landscape architecture. Landscape J. 3(2):136–150.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Collier, J., and
   2. M. Collier

   . 1986. Visual Anthropology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM. 248 pp.
6. ↵
   1. Dey, I.

   1993. Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. Routledge, London, UK. 285 pp.
7. ↵
   1. Kollin, C.,
   2. J. Mahon, and
   3. L. Frame

   1. Evans, L.

   1994. Empowering people: Local and regional urban forestry organizations, pp 248–249. In Kollin, C., J. Mahon, and L. Frame (Eds.). Proceedings of the Sixth National Urban Forest Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
8. ↵
   1. Altman, I., and
   2. A. Churchman

   1. Feldman, R.M., and
   2. S. Stall

   . 1994. The politics of space appropriation: A case study of women’s struggles for homeplace in Chicago public housing, pp 167–199. In Altman, I., and A. Churchman (Eds.). Women and the Environment. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
9. ↵
   1. Fried, M.

   1982. Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction. J. Soc. Issues 38(3):107–119.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Kaplan, R.

    1993a. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape Urban Plann. 26:193–201.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Gobster, P.H.

    1. Kaplan, R.

    1993b. Urban forestry and the workplace, pp 41–45. In Gobster, P.H. (Ed.). Managing Urban and High-Use Recreation Settings: Selected Papers from the Urban Forestry and Ethnic Minorities and the Environment Paper Sessions, International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources. USDA Forest Service, St Paul, MN.
12. ↵
    1. Kaplan, R.

    2001. The nature of the view from home. Environ. Behav. 33(4):507–542.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Phillips, A.F., and
    2. D. J. Gangloff

    1. Kollin, C.

    1986. Citizen action and the greening of San Francisco, pp 96–99. In Phillips, A.F., and D. J. Gangloff (Eds.). Proceedings of the Third National Urban Forestry Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
14. ↵
    1. Kuo, F.

    2003. The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. J. Arboric. 29(3):148–155.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Kuo, F.E.,
    2. M. Bacaicoa, and
    3. W.C. Sullivan

    . 1998. Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environ. Behav. 30(1):28–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Kuo, F.E., and
    2. W.C. Sullivan

    . 1996. Do Trees Strengthen Urban Communities, Reduce Domestic Violence? USDA Forest Service Southern Region, Athens, GA.
17. ↵
    1. Kuo, F.E., and
    2. W.C. Sullivan

    . 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environ. Behav. 33(3):343–365.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Lofland, J., and
    2. L.H. Lofland

    . 1995. Analyzing Social Settings. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA. 268 pp.
19. ↵
    1. Phillips, A.F., and
    2. D.J. Gangloff

    1. Lyons, J.R.

    1986. Congress and urban forestry, pp 264–266. In Phillips, A.F., and D.J. Gangloff (Eds.). Proceedings of the Third National Urban Forestry Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
20. ↵
    1. McDonough, M.H.,
    2. K.E. Vatcha,
    3. S.L. Funkhouser, and
    4. A.L. Gieche

    . 1994. Creating Community-Forestry Partnerships: A Participatory Approach. Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
21. ↵
    1. Miles, M.B., and
    2. A.M. Huberman

    . 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 338 pp.
22. ↵
    1. Parsons, R.,
    2. L.G. Tassinary,
    3. R.S. Ulrich,
    4. M.R. Hebl, and
    5. M. Grossman-Alexander

    . 1998. The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. J. Environ. Psychol. 18(2):113–140.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Relph, D.

    1. Patel, I.C.

    1992. Socio-economic impact of community gardening in an urban setting, pp 84–87. In Relph, D. (Ed.). The Role of Horticulture in Social Well Being. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
24. ↵
    1. Kollin, C.

    1. Pauline, R.

    1993. Greening, neighborhood pride and sense of place, pp 125. In Kollin, C. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Sixth National Urban Forest Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
25. ↵
    1. Perkins, D.D., and
    2. M.A. Zimmerman

    . 1995. Empowerment theory: Research and application. Am. J. Community Psychol. 25(5):569–580.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Phillips, S.B., and
    2. J. Garcia

    . 1994. The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society’s Philadelphia Green, pp 154–156. Proceedings of the Sixth National Urban Forest Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
27. Qualitative Solutions and Research. 1997. QSR NUD*IST Qualitative Analysis Software. Qualitative Solutions and Research, Melbourne, Australia.
28. ↵
    1. Rappaport, J.

    1981. In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. Am. J. Community Psychol. 9(1):1–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Rappaport, J.

    1987. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. Am. J. Community Psychol. 15(2):121–148.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Taylor, A.F.,
    2. F.E. Kuo, and
    3. W.C. Sullivan

    . 2001. Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environ. Behav. 33(1):54–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Taylor, A.F.,
    2. A. Wiley,
    3. F.E. Kuo, and
    4. W.C. Sullivan

    . 1998. Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environ. Behav. 30(1):3–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    U.S. Kerner Commission. 1968. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. The National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, Washington, DC. 425 pp.
33. ↵
    1. Ulrich, R.S.

    1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224(27 April 1984):420–421.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
34. USDA Forest Service. No date. Empowering a Community: The USDA Forest Service’s Role in Rebuilding Los Angeles. USDA Forest Service, no city listed.
35. ↵
    1. Warren, R.L., and
    2. L. Lyon

    1. Warren, R.L.

    1988. The Community in America, pp 152–157. In Warren, R.L., and L. Lyon (Eds.). New Perspectives on the American Community. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA.
36. ↵
    1. Weick, K.E.

    1984. Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. Am. Psychol. 39(1):40–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Wells, N.M.

    2000. At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environ. Behav. 32(6):775–795.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Gobster, P.H.

    1. Westphal, L.M.

    1993. Why trees? Urban forestry volunteers values and motivations, pp 19–23. In Gobster, P.H. (Ed.). Managing Urban and High Use Recreation Settings: Selected Papers from the Urban Forestry and Ethnic Minorities and the Environment Paper Sessions, International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources. USDA Forest Service, St Paul, MN.
39. ↵
    1. Kollin, C., and
    2. M. Barratt

    1. Westphal, L.M.

    1995. Participation in urban forestry projects: How the community benefits, pp 101–104. In Kollin, C., and M. Barratt (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th National Urban Forest Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC.
40. ↵
    1. Westphal, L.M.

    1999. Growing Power: Social Benefits of Urban Greening Projects. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
41. ↵
    1. Bengston, D.

    1. Westphal, L.M.

    2000. Increasing the trustworthiness of research results: The role of computers in qualitative text analysis, pp 1–6. In Bengston, D. (Ed.). Applications of Computer Text Analysis in Natural Resources. USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN.
42. ↵
    1. Wolf, K.

    2003. Public response to the urban forest inner-city business districts. J. Arboric. 29(3): 117–126.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Zimmerman, M.A.

    1995. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. Am. J. Community Psychol. 25(5):581–599.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Rappaport, J., and
    2. E. Seidman

    1. Zimmerman, M.A.

    2000. Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis, pp 43–63. In Rappaport, J., and E. Seidman (Eds.). Handbook of Community Psychology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York, NY.
45. ↵
    1. Zimmerman, M.A.,
    2. B.A. Israel,
    3. A. Schulz, and
    4. B. Checkoway

    . 1992. Further explorations of empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. Am. J. Community Psychol. 20(6):707–727.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Zimmerman, M.A., and
    2. S. Warschausky

    . 1998. Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: Conceptual and methodological issues. Rehabil. Psychol. 43(1):3–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science