Residential Landscaping in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.: Practices and Preferences Relative to Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Anderson, L.M., and
   2. H.K. Cordell

   . 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:153–164.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   Arizona Department of Water Resources. 2002. http://www.adwr.state.az.us/AZWaterInfo/InsideAMAs/amaphoenix.html (accessed 11/19/02).
3. ↵
   Arizona State University. 2001. Center for Business Research. http://webdev.cob.asu.edu/seid/cbr/popest.pdf (accessed 11/19/02).
4. ↵
   1. Correll, M.R., and
   2. J.L. Knetson

   . 1978. The effects of green belts on residential property values: Some findings on the political economy of open space. Land Econ. 54:207–211.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Dillman, D.A.

   1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
6. ↵
   1. Garber, M.P., and
   2. K. Bondari

   . 1995. Landscape installations firms: I. Business characteristics and trends affecting industry performance. J. Environ. Hortic. 13:31–34.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Getz, D.A.,
   2. A. Karow, and
   3. J.J. Kielbaso

   . 1982. Inner city preferences for trees and urban forest programs. J. Arboric. 8:258–263.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Fry, J.,
   2. L. Nogue,
   3. C. Patterson, and
   4. C.S. Smith

   , 2001. Historic land use phase II. 3rd Annual CAP LTER Research Symposium: 15.
9. ↵
   1. Hall, J.S.,
   2. N.J. Cayer, and
   3. N. Welch

   1. Gober, P.E.,
   2. E.K. Burns,
   3. K. Knowles-Yanez, and
   4. J. James

   . 1998. Rural-to-urban land conversion in metropolitan Phoenix, pp 40–45. In Hall, J.S., N.J. Cayer, and N. Welch. Arizona Policy Choices. Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
10. ↵
    1. Hardy, J.,
    2. B.K. Behe,
    3. S.S. Barton,
    4. T.J. Page,
    5. R.E. Schutzki,
    6. K. Muzii,
    7. R.T. Fernandez,
    8. M.T. Haque,
    9. J. Booker,
    10. C.R. Hall,
    11. R. Hinson,
    12. P. Knight,
    13. R. McNeil,
    14. D.B. Rowe, and
    15. C. Safley

    . 2000. Consumers’ preferences for plant size, type of plant material and design sophistication in residential landscaping. J. Environ. Hortic.18:224–230.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Hull, R.B.

    1992. How the public values urban forests. J. Arboric. 18:98–101.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Kaplan, R.

    1984. The impact of urban nature: A theoretical analysis. Urban Ecol. 8:189–197.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    Maricopa County Tax Assessor. 2002. http://www.maricopa.gov/parcelApplication/default.asp (accessed 11/19/02)
14. ↵
    1. Martin, C.A.

    2001. Landscape Water Use in Phoenix, Ariz. Des. Plants 17:26–31.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Martin, C.A., and
    2. L.B. Stabler

    . 2002. Plant gas exchange and water status in urban desert landscapes. J. Arid Environ. 51(2):235–254.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Martin C.A.,
    2. L.B. Stabler, and
    3. A.J. Brazel

    . 2000. Summer and winter patterns of air temperature and humidity under calm conditions in relation to urban land use. 3rd Symposium on the Urban Environment 3:197–198.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. McBride, J.R.

    1977. Evaluation of vegetation in environmental planning. Landscape Plann. 4:291–312.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.

    1994. Using urban forests for energy efficiency and carbon storage. J. For. 92:36–38, 40–41.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.

    1998. Structure and sustainability of Sacramento’s urban forest. J. Arboric. 24:174–190.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. R.A. Haip

    . 1989. Emerging desert landscape in Tucson. Geog. Rev. 79:435–449.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. L.P. Herrington, and
    3. G.M. Heisler

    . 1988. Impacts of vegetation on residential heating and cooling. Ener. Build. 12:41–51.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. J.R. Simpson, and
    3. P.L. Sacamano

    . 1993. The impact of vegetation on air conditioning and landscape water use in Phoenix. Am. Nurseryman 178(12):165–168.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Motloch, J.L.

    1991. An Introduction to Landscape Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishers, New York, NY. 307 pp.
24. ↵
    1. Niemiera, A.X.,
    2. J. Innis-Smith, and
    3. C.E. Leda

    . 1993. Survey of garden center customer informational and marketing needs. J. Environ. Hortic. 11:25–27.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. J.C. Stevens,
    3. S.M. Sisinni, and
    4. C.J. Luley

    . 2002. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Arboric. 28:113–122.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. O’Rourke, M.K.

    1981. Composition and distribution of urban vegetation in the Tucson basin. J. Arid Environ. 5:235–248.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Rodie, S.N., and
    2. E.T. Paprozzi

    . 1999. Public perceptions of landscape design as a nursery industry service and quality-of-life enhancement factor. J. Environ. Hortic. 17:18–24.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Rowntree, R.A., and
    2. D.J. Nowak

    . 1991. Quantifying the role of urban forests in removing atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Arboric. 17:269–275.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    U.S. Census Bureau. 2002a. http://www.census.gov (accessed 11/19/02).
30. ↵
    U.S. Census Bureau. 2002b. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04/04013.html (acccessed 1/19/02).
31. ↵
    1. Zmyslony, J., and
    2. D. Gagnon

    . 1998. Residential management of urban front-yard landscape: A random process? Landscape Urban Plann. 40:295–307.

    OpenUrl