Missouri Urban Forest—a Ten-Year Comparison

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers. 1992. Guide for Plant Appraisal (8th ed.). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 41 pp.
2. Forest ReLeaf of Missouri. Volunteers at Work. Forest ReLeaf of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, pp 8–9.
3. ↵
   1. Gamstetter, D.N.

   1998. Proceedings of the 8th National Urban Forestry Conference. American Forests, Washington, DC. 68 pp.
4. ↵
   1. Harris, R.W.,
   2. J.R. Clark, and
   3. N.P. Matheny

   . 1999. Arboriculture: Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. ↵
   International Society of Arboriculture. 1998. Why Topping Hurts Trees. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
6. ↵
   1. Iles, J.

   1989. The case against tree topping. Grounds Maint. 24(6):51, 74.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Karlovich, D.A.,
   2. J.W. Groninger, and
   3. David D. Close

   . 2000. Tree condition associated with topping in southern Illinois communities. J. Arboric. 26:87–89.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Krebs, Charles J.

   1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper Collins, New York, NY.
9. ↵
   Missouri Department of Conservation. Annual Report 1998–1999. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO, pp 45–47.
10. ↵
    1. Poracsky, J., and
    2. M. Scott

    . 1999. Industrial-area street trees in Portland, Oregon. J. Arboric. 25:9–17.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Rocca, J.P.

    1992. Survey Shows need for city trees. Missouri Municipal Review. 57(4):20–21.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Wolf, K.L.

    1999. Grow for the Gold: Trees in Business Districts. TreeLink, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.