Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

A Study Of CTLA Formula Values

Gary Watson
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2001, 27 (6) 289-297; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2001.032
Gary Watson
The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, U.S. 60532
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Appraisal data collected and calculations performed.

    Required Data
    State/ZIP code
    Year appraised
    Dbh
    Species name (uniform species code assigned)
    Species rating
    Condition rating
    Location rating (site, contribution, and placement for the 8th edition of the Guide)
    Site class (street, residential property, commercial, parking lot, etc.)
    Basic price (value per trunk cross-sectional square inch in U.S. dollars)
    Largest commonly available transplanted tree value and size (8th edition only)
    Cleanup and repair costs
    Settled value
    Casualty loss or inventory
    Client responsible for or experiencing loss (casualty loss only)
    Serial number (assigned)
    Guide edition used
    Calculations
    Location (8th edition)
    Trunk cross-sectional area (adjusted for large trees as required by 8th edition)
    Formula value without condition rating (varies with edition used)
    Appraised value (converted to 1998 dollars, the year for which the most recent Consumer Price Index information was available at the time the database was finalized)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Comparable appraised values for trees by species class and size class derived from actual formula method appraisals. High and low values represent the mean ± one standard deviation. Values are expressed in U.S. dollars.

    Species class (%)Low valueHigh valueNo. of recordsLow valueHigh valueNo. of recordsLow valueHigh valueNo. of records
    4-in. dbh5-in. dbh6-in. dbh
    1009451110314014210
    203594445581551578218668
    3031715546124431074308147
    40151981,4058529762688393276
    50591861,8031243201,031135429319
    60572141,5911663241,089176455281
    70702193,5151853352,543210472940
    80822192,9051773582,007217500844
    90672401,620177357824246490510
    10010120562820431344529644456
    7-in. dbh8-in. dbh9-in. dbh
    10******3414529
    20732481428732950173301157
    3097405225119482113190538276
    40173478524181580233247696518
    50255514779233665298337782920
    603255331,1523276833004348211,087
    703565602,5784026961,0095308213,349
    803485961,8963927701,0635318782,328
    90333608751427776499535891950
    10035954934349772292571832362
    10-in. dbh11-in. dbh12- to 14-in. dbh
    10051611069511***
    2030438439346528241253446258
    30Til653122310837349403834579
    403148312624049805154761,215708
    504319022714871,1028756451,416735
    604231,0703235891,1681,0067261,6211,122
    705911,0361,3167581,1333,2899721,5773,769
    806501,0821,3797541,2371,9229841,6822,394
    906671,1435038001,2557761,0271,672991
    1007701,091768571,2283541,0411,607509
    15- to 16-in. dbh17- to 18-in. dbh19- to 20-in. dbh
    10051611069511***
    202296892133638951543581,079197
    305571,0067496491,2969838371,436981
    406121,5047226571,9008427642,261923
    508291,7495578392,2533549722,719251
    609192,0298561,0942,4576811,3312,941609
    701,2052,0203,1211,4342,5012,6561,8132,9562,591
    801,2352,1761,9621,4452,7971,6481,7943,3881,422
    901,3322,1737011,6552,8175772,0913,419485
    1001,3362,1704581,7562,8724492,1593,594407
    21- to 22-in. dbh23- to 25-in. dbh26- to 28-in. dbh
    10*********
    204121,4111036281,5861137431,90165
    309941,7069589932,2099711,2632,620846
    408652,6519831,0393,1021,5661,3363,7331,435
    509683,3021648674,1651481,1265,07795
    601,4583,5043631,6594,2173822,3274,956292
    702,0623,5302,0462,3574,3142,3493,1625,1492,503
    802,0874,0711,0972,3995,0181,2593,1706,1161,189
    902,5514,1123333,0555,0624373,8356,373408
    1002,8044,3014063,3735,3954584,3506,727536
    29- to 31-in. dbh32- to 35-in. dbh36- to 39-in. dbh
    10*********
    201,2541,861411,4542,612118936,01410
    301,4063,5943731,7004,3262422,5106,31873
    401,9054,8321,0762,1935,7108913,2367,506404
    502,1936,132741,6558,044424,2818,36821
    603,3176,4511123,3758,0401055,2409,30843
    704,0517,0111,2494,8548,1961,3286,17610,263813
    804,2637,9467925,2149,3898266,62111,700552
    905,1568,0532986,3499,7272438,17312,024161
    1005,6968,3652456,95110,5162609,08712,978164
    40- to 44-in. dbh45- to 50-in. dbh
    10******
    20******
    303,1987,525323,9157,6518
    403,2239,2251913,68810,89569
    504,42810,05993,18114,6936
    605,93910,898507,26814,16814
    706,98812,5124347,94017,333134
    807,88914,58437110,24119,141134
    9010,45515,30511112,90020,86523
    10011,91317,4459215,49422,92644
    • ↵*Insufficient data.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Mean dbh measurement, condition, and location for casualty loss and inventory appraisals.

    Casualty lossInventory
    Current value ($)2,5073,124*
    Dbh (in.)13.415.5*
    Species (%)7161*
    Location (%)5469*
    Condition (%)6253*
    • ↵*Significantly different from casualty loss at P < 0.001.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Comparison of appraised value by client type.

    Owner of damaged treePerson causing damage
    Current value ($)2,2262,948*
    Dbh (in.)13.513.3
    Location (%)5158*
    Condition (%)5867*
    • ↵*Significantly different from owner of damaged trees at P < 0.001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 27 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 27, Issue 6
November 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Study Of CTLA Formula Values
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
A Study Of CTLA Formula Values
Gary Watson
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2001, 27 (6) 289-297; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.032

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Study Of CTLA Formula Values
Gary Watson
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2001, 27 (6) 289-297; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.032
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • SUMMARY
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Tree appraisal
  • formula method
  • CTLA

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire