Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Homeowners’ Opinions on The Practice and Effects of Topping Trees

David D. Close, John W. Groninger, Jean C. Mangun and Paul L. Roth
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 160-165; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2001.018
David D. Close
1*Community Forestry Volunteer Coordinator, Department of Forestry-4411, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale IL, U.S. 62901-4411
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Groninger
2Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry-4411, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale IL, U.S. 62901-4411
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean C. Mangun
3Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry-4411, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale IL, U.S. 62901-4411
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul L. Roth
4Professor, Department of Forestry-4411, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale IL, U.S. 62901-4411
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Respondents were asked to select the factor that influenced their decision to have their tree topped. Results show that a difference in response exists between the two respondent groups. In fact, no utility respondent marked “more than one” as a response.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Respondents were asked which statement is most true about topping. This illustrates the point that in general, homeowners do not understand the consequences of topping a tree.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Respondents were asked to rate their level of satisfaction with the results of topping. These results clearly show that homeowners with utility-topped trees were dissatisfied with topping, while homeowners who allowed their trees to be topped were generally satisfied with the results.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Crosstab analysis of level of education with level of satisfaction with the results of topping. Weights: 2 < high school, 4 = high school/GED, 6 = associate’s, 8 = bachelor’s, 10 = master’s, 13 = PhD. This figure illustrates that people satisfied with topping had an overall lower level of formal education than those that were dissatisfied or neutral with the results.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents (n = 271).

    AgeHighest level of educationAnnual household income (US$)Estimated property value (US$)Length of time at current residence (years)
    <29 (3%)<High school (5%)<20,000 (21%)<25,000 (3%)<5 (20%)
    30-39 (11%)High school/GED (48%)20,001-40,000 (21%)25,000-49,999 (21%)5-9.99 (12%)
    40-49 (19%)Associate’s (9%)40,001-60,000 (22%)50,000-74,999 (27%)10-14.99 (8%)
    50-59 (13%)Bachelor’s (16%)>60,000 (17%)75,000-99,999 (18%)15-19.99 (5%)
    >60 (44%)Master’s (9%)No response (19%)>100,000 (7%)20-24.99 (8%)
    No response (10%)PhD (4%)No response (24%)>25 (36%)
    No response (9%)No response (11%)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 27 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 27, Issue 3
May 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Homeowners’ Opinions on The Practice and Effects of Topping Trees
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Homeowners’ Opinions on The Practice and Effects of Topping Trees
David D. Close, John W. Groninger, Jean C. Mangun, Paul L. Roth
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 160-165; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Homeowners’ Opinions on The Practice and Effects of Topping Trees
David D. Close, John W. Groninger, Jean C. Mangun, Paul L. Roth
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 160-165; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Topping
  • homeowner opinion
  • Community Forestry
  • anti-topping campaigns
  • utility line clearance

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire