Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

A Survey to Determine the Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations of 25 Landscape Tree Species

Ed Perry and Gary W. Hickman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 152-159; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2001.017
Ed Perry
1Horticulture Farm Advisors, University of California Cooperative Extension, 3800 Cornucopia Way, Suite A, Modesto, CA, U.S. 95358
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary W. Hickman
2*Horticulture Farm Advisors, University of California Cooperative Extension, 3800 Cornucopia Way, Suite A, Modesto, CA, U.S. 95358
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Ranges and medians of total nitrogen (percent total N on dry weight basis) in leaves of 25 landscape tree species.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Range of total nitrogen (percent total N on dry weight basis) in leaves of 25 landscape tree species.

    Tree speciesRange (%)*
    White mulberry (Moms alba)2.0-3.6
    White birch (Betula pendula)2.2-3.4
    Goldenrain tree (Koelreuteria paniculata)1.9-3.5
    Silver maple (Acer saccharinum)2.0-3.4
    Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos)2.3-3.1
    Raywood ash (Fraxinus oxycarpa)2.1-2.9
    Valley oak (Quercus lobata)2.1-2.9
    Crapemyrtle (Lagerstroemia indica)1.1-3.5
    Modesto ash (Fraxinus velutina ‘Modesto’)1.8-2.7
    Zelkova (Zelkova serrata)1.8-2.8
    Chinese pistache (Pistachia chinensis)1.6-3.0
    White alder (Alnus rhombifolia)1.9-2.6
    Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora)1.0-3.5
    Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum)1.7-2.7
    Chinese hackberry (Celtis sinensis)1.4-2.8
    Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.)1.8-2.1
    London planetree (Platanus acerifolia)1.4-2.6
    Holly oak (Quercus ilex)1.3-2.8
    Tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera)1.2-2.8
    Cork oak (Quercus suber)1.5-2.2
    Maidenhair tree (Ginkgo biloba)1.4-2.4
    Olive (Olea europa)1.3-1.9
    Camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora)1.2-2.0
    Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’)1.1-1.9
    Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara)1.0-1.4
    • ↵* Range of 20 trees sampled.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Ranges of total nitrogen (percent total N on dry weight basis) in leaves of selected landscape tree species from three studies.

    Tree speciesRanges(%)
    Perry and HickmanzMills and JonesyKopinga and van den Burg*
    White mulberry (Moms alba)2.0-3.61.2-2.4—
    White birch (Betula pendula)2.2-3.44.0-4.62.3-3.3
    Goldenrain tree (Koelreuteria paniculata)1.9-3.52.5-2.8—
    Silver maple (Acer saccharinum)2.0-3.42.3-2.61.9-2.7
    Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos)2.3-3.12.4-4.02.0-2.5
    Crapemyrtle (Lagerstroemia indica)1.1-3.51.6-2.1—
    Zelkova (Zelkova serrata)1.8-2.82.3-3.1—
    Chinese pistache (Pistachia chinensis)1.6-3.02.1-2.8—
    Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.)1.8-2.11.2-1.2—
    London planetree (Platanus acerifolia)1.4-2.62.0-2.72.0-2.6
    Tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera)1.2-2.81.9-4.32.6-3.0
    Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’)1.1-1.91.6-2.5—
    • ↵z After Perry and Hickman, Current Study. Samples taken from trees growing in landscapes.

    • ↵y After Mills and Jones, 1996. Samples taken from trees growing in botanical gardens, field research plots, and field and container production nurseries.

    • ↵* After Kopinga and van den Burg, 1995. Sample source not given.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Mean total nitrogen (percent total N on dry weight basis) in leaves of 25 landscape tree species.

    Tree speciesMean (%)zy
    White mulberry (Morus alba)2.9 a
    Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos)2.8 ab
    White birch (Betula pendula)2.7 ab
    Goldenrain tree (Koelreuteria paniculata)2.6 b
    Silver maple (Acer saccharinum)2.6 b
    Raywood ash (Fraxinus oxycarpa)2.4 c
    Valley oak (Quercus lobata)2.3 c
    White alder (Alnus rhombifolia)2.3 c
    Chinese pistache (Pistachia chinensis)2.3 c
    Modesto ash (Fraxinus velutina ‘Modesto’)2.2 cd
    Zelkova (Zelkova serrata)2.2 cde
    Crapemyrtle (Lagerstroemia indica)2.2 cde
    Chinese hackberry (Celtis sinensis)2.2 cde
    Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum)2.1 cde
    London planetree (Platanus acerifolia)2.0 def
    Tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera)2.0 def
    Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.)1.9 ef
    Cork oak (Quercus suber)1.9 f
    Maidenhair tree (Ginkgo biloba)1.9 f
    Holly oak (Quercus ilex)1.6 g
    Olive (Olea europa)1.6 g
    Camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora)1.6 g
    Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’)1-6 g
    Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora)1.3 h
    Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara)1.1 h
    • ↵z Range of 20 trees sampled.

    • ↵y Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at 5% (DMRT).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 27 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 27, Issue 3
May 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Survey to Determine the Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations of 25 Landscape Tree Species
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
A Survey to Determine the Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations of 25 Landscape Tree Species
Ed Perry, Gary W. Hickman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 152-159; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Survey to Determine the Leaf Nitrogen Concentrations of 25 Landscape Tree Species
Ed Perry, Gary W. Hickman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 152-159; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.017
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • nitrogen
  • leaf nitrogen
  • leaf analysis

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire