Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Fredric Miller and George Ware
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 118-125; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2001.014
Fredric Miller
1*Agriculture & Horticulture Sciences Department, Joliet Junior College, 1215 Houbolt Road, Joliet, IL, U.S. 60431
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
George Ware
2The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL, U.S. 60532
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mean development time, percent pupation, and percent adult emergence of P. luteola in the no-choice larval suitability bioassay.

    Species/hybridNzDevelopment time (larva to adult) (d)yPercent pupationyPercent adult emergencey
    U. castaneifolia30—x3 ± 0.03 a0 ± 0.00 a
    U. changii3026 ± 1.00 ab7 ± 0.05 a7 ± 0.05 a
    U. chenmoui3025 ± 0.75 ab40 ± 0.09 b40 ± 0.09 b
    U. davidiana30—x3 ± 0.03 a0 ± 0.00 a
    U. davidiana × U.japonica3021 ± 0.83 ab23 ± 0.08 a23 ± 0.08 a
    U. davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila3013 ± 0.30 a57 ± 0.09 b53 ± 0.08 b
    U. davidiana × U. propinqua30—w0 ± 0.00 a0 ± 0.00 a
    U. davidiana × U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™3025 ± 1.00 ab3 ± 0.03 a3 ± 0.03 a
    U. elongata30—w0 ± 0.00 a0 ± 0.00 a
    U. gaussenii3025 ± 1.7 ab13 ± 0.06 a13 i 0.06 a
    U. glaucescens3019 ± 0.46 a50 ± 0.09 b47 ± 0.09 b
    U.japonica3021 ± 0.53 ab30 ± 0.09 ab30 ± 0.09 ab
    U. íamellosa3019 ± 0.53 a40 ± 0.09 b37 ± 0.09 b
    U. macrocarpa3018 ± 0.37 a57 ± 0.09 b50 ± 0.07
    U. parvifolia30—w0 ± 0.00 a0 ± 0.00 a
    U. propinqua3020 ± 1.0 ab7 ± 0.05 a7 ± 0.05 a
    U. pumila (reference)3018 ± 0.42 a53 ± 0.09 b53 ± 0.09 b
    U. szechuanica30—w0 ± 0.00 a0 ± 0.00 a
    U. szechuanica × U.japonica3018 ± 0.21 a50 ± 0.09 b47 ± 0.09 b
    U. wilsoniana3020 ± 0.40 ab33 ± 0.09 ab30 ± 0.09 ab
    U. ‘Morton’-Accolade”‘3027 ± 1.67 b20 ± 0.09 a20 ± 0.09 a
    U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U.japonica3022 ± 1.00 ab7 ± 0.05 a7 ± 0.05 a
    U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U. pumila3018 ± 0.33a40 ± 0.10 b40 ± 0.10 b
    U. ‘Morton Glossy’-Triumph™3021 ± 1.2 ab23 ± 0.08 a23 ± 0.08 a
    U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™3019 ± 0.33 a53 ± 0.09 b53 ± 0.09 b
    U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × U. davidiana3021 ± 0.84 ab23 ± 0.08 a23 ± 0.08 a
    U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × U.japonica-ivilsoniana-pumila3021 ± 0.70 ab30 ± 0.09 ab30 ± 0.09 ab
    U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™3019 ± 0.54 a53 ± 0.09 b53 ± 0.09 b
    • ↵z Represents ten individual larvae for each of three individual trees for each elm biotype.

    • ↵y Values within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05; Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) multiple comparison test).

    • ↵x Larvae reached pupation, but no adults emerged.

    • ↵w No larvae reached pupation.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mean number of eggs laid per female, percent females ovipositing, preovipositional period, male longevity, and female longevity of adult P. luteola reared in the larval suitability experiment.

    Species/hybridNzEggs laid/femaleyPercent females ovipositingyPreovipositional period (d)yMale longevity(d)yFemale longevity (d)y
    U. changii1200 ± 30.1 c100 ± 15.0 c9± 1.0 b1 ± 0.1 a21 ± 0.6 c
    U. chenmoui411 ± 6.2 a100 ± 15.0 c20 ± 2.5 c20 ± 0.6 c21 ± 0.6 c
    U. davidiana × U. japonica320 ± 11.8 a66 ± 33.0 ab7 ± 4.5 a9 ± 4.8 b2 ± 0.5 a
    U. davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila3168 ± 18.6 c100 ± 20.0 ab11 ± 3.0 b17 ± 4.0 c20 ± 4.1 c
    U. davidiana × U. japonica U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™3129 ± 44.6 b100 ± 15.0 c11 ± 1.5 b17 ± 2.3 c20 ± 1.0 c
    ü. gaussenii139 ± 9.5 ab100 ± 18.0 c16 ± 2.0 c21 ± 1.2 c20 ± 0.0 c
    U. glaucescens48 ± 3.6 a38 ± 19.0 ab14 ± 4.5 c15 ± 2.2 c15 ± 2.3 b
    U. japonica3O± 0.0 a0 ± 0.0 a—10 ± 3.3 b5 ± 1.2 a
    U. lamellosa461 ± 23.0 ab33 ± 18.0 ab10 ± 1.0 b12 ± 4.3 b16 ± 3.5 b
    U macrocarpa577 ± 19.1 ab80 ± 20.0 b11 ± 1.0 b15 ± 2.2 c18 ± 1.2 c
    U. propinqua123 ± 11.9 a100 ± 20.0 c19 ± 2.0 c21 ± 0.9 c21 ± 1.0 c
    U. pumila (reference)4135 ± 28.9 c67 ± 33.0 ab8 ± 1.0 a10 ± 5.9 b19 ± 0.9 c
    U. szechuanica × U. japonica698 ± 41.1 b67 ± 33.0 ab5 ± 1.7 a15 ± 2.5 c15 ± 2.6 b
    U. wilsoniana385 ± 31.1 ab100 ± 17.0 c8 ± 0.6 a20 ± 0.6 c21 ± 0.0 c
    U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™1207 ± 25.0 d100 ± 15.0 c8 ± 0.6 a21 ± 0.6 c11 ± 5.2 b
    U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™× U. pumila4155 ± 31.2 c100 ± 25.0 c7 ± 2.0 a6 ± 2.1 a20 ± 1.0 c
    U.’Morton Glossy’-Triumph™20 ± 0.0 a0 ± 0.0 a—19 ± 2.5 c15 ± 1.6 b
    U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™6188 ± 19.7 c100 ± 20.0 c7 ± 2.3 a19 ± 0.9 c18 ± 1.7 c
    U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × U. pumila U. davidiana3102 ± 68.0 b67 ± 33.0 ab7 ± 4.0a7 ÷ 4.6 a15 ± 4.3 b
    U.’Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × U. pumila U. japonica-u>ilsoniana-pumila584 ± 41.2 ab40 ± 20.0 ab7 ± 0.5 a18 ± 3.0 c20 ± 1.4 c
    U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™8178 ± 25.1 c100 ± 15.0 c7 ± 1.3 a17 ± 1.0 c21 ± 0.3 c
    • ↵z Number of adult male/female P. luteola pairs reared from the larval suitability experiment.

    • ↵y Values within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05; Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) multiple comparison test).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 27 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 27, Issue 3
May 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fredric Miller, George Ware
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 118-125; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fredric Miller, George Ware
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 118-125; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2001.014
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Pyrrhalta luteola
  • elm leaf beetle
  • Ulmus
  • larval development
  • adult suitability

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire