Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Fredric Miller and George Ware
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 118-125; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.2001.27.3.118
Fredric Miller
1*Agriculture & Horticulture Sciences Department, Joliet Junior College, 1215 Houbolt Road, Joliet, IL, U.S. 60431
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
George Ware
2The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL, U.S. 60532
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Selected elms (Ulmus spp.) and their hybrids growing at The Morton Arboretum in Lisle, Illinois, U.S., were evaluated in no-choice larval and adult suitability laboratory bioassays for the elm leaf beetle, Pyrrhalta luteola Müller. No-choice larval suitability studies revealed that the elm biotypes of U. davidiana × U. japonica, U. elongata, U. parvifolia, U. szechuanica, and U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ were the least suitable for larval development and pupation. Ulmus davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, U. pumila (reference), U. lamellosa, U. macrocarpa, U. szechuanica × U. japonica, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, and U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™ were more suitable for larval development and pupation. Similar low and high suitability rankings were also observed for adult beetles in no-choice studies reared from the larval suitability study. Larval development time and proportion of larvae reaching pupation appear to be good predictors of adult emergence. Larvae feeding on less suitable biotypes took longer to develop with a lesser proportion of adults emerging. The reverse is also true. Preovipositional period was found, in part, to be a function of suitability. Female longevity reflected suitability for the elms tested in this study. Ulmus pumila appears to be a major influence on both larval and adult host suitability. The least suitable elm biotypes, listed above, show promise for future elm breeding programs and for use in localities with acute and chronic elm leaf beetle populations.

Key Words
  • Pyrrhalta luteola
  • elm leaf beetle
  • Ulmus
  • larval development
  • adult suitability

The elm leaf beetle (Pyrrhalta luteola Müller) is a common defoliator of elms (Ulmus spp.) and is a significant pest affecting urban elm trees in most parts of the United States (Kielbaso and Kennedy 1983; Nielsen et al. 1985; Wu et al. 1991). It is Europe and was imported into the United States in the 1830s. The Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.) is widely accepted as a highly preferred host.

In recent years, studies have been conducted to evaluate many elm biotypes for feeding preference and to measure the suitability of Asian, European, and North American elms for adult elm leaf beetles. Ulmus pumila has been widely planted both as a windbreak tree and as a replacement for American elm (U. americana L.) owing to losses from Dutch elm disease. Many communities throughout the range of the elm leaf beetle have large numbers of Siberian elm (U. pumila) that experience chronic defoliation leading to tree stress and potential mortality from secondary pests (e.g., borers, facultative pathogens).

Seed sources of new Chinese elm species recently became available, resulting in extensive breeding programs for Asian elms resistant to Dutch elm disease (Ware 1992, 1995). Many of these Asian elms and hybrids have been evaluated for susceptibility to feeding by the elm leaf beetle, and a number of biotypes such as U. parvifolia Jacquin, U. wilsoniana Schneider, U. japonica Sargent, U. davidiana Planchen, and U. szechuanica Fang, show very low to low suitability (Hall 1986; Hall et al. 1987; Hall and Young 1986; Miller and Ware 1994,1997,1999;Young and Hall 1986).

Previous studies, except two (Hall and Young 1986; Luck and Scriven 1979), utilized adult beetles in no-choice and multiple-choice laboratory feeding bioassays. While helpful in determining preference and suitability, these studies did not establish whether the elm leaf beetle is capable of successfully completing its life cycle and were limited in the number of Asiatic elm biotypes tested.

The experiment presented here examined the suitability of 28 elm biotypes for elm leaf beetle larvae (Table 1). Adults reared from the larval suitability study were also utilized in a no-choice study using the same elm biotypes (Table 2).The results provide a more comprehensive picture of the suitability of Asian elm biotypes for the elm leaf beetle and provide further direction for future elm breeding programs for resistance to elm leaf beetles.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Mean development time, percent pupation, and percent adult emergence of P. luteola in the no-choice larval suitability bioassay.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Mean number of eggs laid per female, percent females ovipositing, preovipositional period, male longevity, and female longevity of adult P. luteola reared in the larval suitability experiment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

No-Choice Larval Suitability Laboratory Bioassay

We used newly emerged and unfed elm leaf beetle (P. luteola) larvae hatching from eggs laid on the foliage of U. pumila seedlings. These seedlings were growing in 7.6-L (2-gal) pots and covered with light screen mesh to prevent beetles from escaping. Seedlings were held in the laboratory at 25°C (77°F) and under 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod. Adult beetles were reared from late instar larvae and pupae collected from U. pumila trees at North Platte, Nebraska, and shipped overnight to The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois. On arrival, these larvae and pupae were held in clear Plexiglas cages in an incubator at 25°C and 16:8 (L:D) h photoperiod. As adults emerged, they were released onto U. pumila seedlings and allowed to feed, mate, and oviposit.

For the host suitability test, we used 24-h-old P. luteola larvae. Neonates of P. luteala initially cluster at or near the egg mass before initiation of feeding; these were randomly selected from an egg mass and transferred to a single leaf of the test elm that was placed in a plastic petri dish (0.6 × 10.0 mm). Ten such petri dishes (subreplicates) were used for each tree replicate, and there were three trees per elm biotype. Petri dishes were placed into a clear plastic bag to retain the moisture. The petri dishes were checked daily for larval mortality, evidence of feeding, prepupation, pupation, and adult emergence.

Test elm biotypes ranged from 5 tol5 m (15 to 50 ft) high, with diameters 5 to 40 cm (2 to 16 in.) at a height of 1.5 m (5 ft). Leaves for the bioassays were randomly collected at ground level from the lower half of trees at all four cardinal directions. The leaf samples included the terminal 31 cm (12 in.) of elm branches. Only fully expanded leaves were used. Leaf samples were taken in this way to compensate for variation in leaf quality within trees. Leaf samples were held in cold storage in plastic bags at 5°C (41 °F) for a maximum of 3 d. Leaves collected from each test tree for each biotype were combined for the bioassays. Larval bioassays ceased when larvae died or when adults emerged.

Proportion of larvae pupating was calculated by totaling pupae on each tree of a given elm biotype. Larval suitability for each biotype was measured as the mean proportion of larvae pupating and mean larval development time.

No-Choice Adult Suitability Laboratory Bioassay

Adults emerging from the larval suitability experiment were placed in standard plastic petri dishes on leaves from the same test elms. Methods for this bioassay were conducted as previously described by Miller and Ware (1994, 1997, 1999). Suitability for a biotype was defined as the mean number of eggs laid per female and the mean percentage of ovipositing females. Mean preovipositional period (POP), male longevity, and female longevity also were determined as previously described by Miller and Ware (1994,1997,1999).

Statistical Analysis

Measures of larval and adult suitability were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using biotype as the main effect. Proportional data were arcsine square-root transformed to correct for nonnormality. Means were compared with a Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. Single linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between larval and adult suitability variables. Data are presented as original means ± SEM. Data were analyzed using SigmaStat for Windows (Jandel Scientific, 1992).

RESULTS

No-Choice Larval Suitability Laboratory Bioassay

A significantly greater proportion of larvae pupated when fed leaves of U. chenmoui Cheng, U. davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, U. glaucescens Franchet, U. lamellosa S. Wang et S.L. Chang et L.K. Fu, U. macrocarpa Hance, U. pumila (reference), U. szechuanica × U. japonica, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U. pumila, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, and U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™ compared with the remaining biotypes in which the proportion of larvae pupating was <24% (F = 168.0; df = 27, 839; P < 0.0001). Ulmus castaneifolia Hemsley, U. changii Cheng, U. davidiana, U. davidiana × U.japonica, U. davidiana × U. propinqua, U. davidiana × U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™, U. elongata L. K. Fu et C. S. Ding, U. gaussenii Cheng, U. parvifolia, U. propinqua Koidzumi, U. szechuanica, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U. japonica, and U. ‘Morton-Glossy’-Triumph™ were the least suitable for beetle larval development, with < 24% of the larvae reaching the pupal stage. (Table 1).

Development time also differed significantly among elm biotypes (F = 38.5; 21, 629, P < 0.04). Larvae feeding on U. davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, U. glaucescens, U. lamellosa, U. macrocarpa, U.pumila (reference), U. szechuanica × U. japonica, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U. pumila, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, and U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™ reached adulthood in 18 d (Table 1). Larvae feeding on less suitable biotypes had a mean development time of 21 d (range 20 to 26). Larval development on U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ was significantly longer than all other biotypes at 27 d. Larvae feeding on U. davidiana × U. propinqua, U. elongata, U. parvifolia, and U. szechuanica failed to pupate (Table 1). Larvae feeding on U. castaneifolia and U. davidiana reached pupation by 21 and 19 d, respectively, but no adults emerged (Table 1).

A significantly greater proportion of adults emerged when larvae fed on U. chenmoui, U. davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, U. glaucescens, U. lamellosa, U. pumila, U. macrocarpa, U. szechuanica × U.japonica, U.’Morton’-Accolade™ × U. pumila, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, and U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™ (F = 154.0; df = 27, 839; P < 0.0001 (Table 1). No adults emerged when larvae fed on U. castaneifolia, U. davidiana, U. davidiana × U. propinqua, U. elongata, U. parvifolia, and U. szechuanica (Table 1).

Development time from larva to adult was correlated with percent adult emergence (R2 = 0.31, F = 14.0, df = 24, P = 0.006, y = 23.7 - 0.10×), and the proportion of larvae reaching pupation was highly correlated with adult emergence (R2 = 0.99, F = 49.1, df = 28, P < 0.0001, y = 0.42 ± 0.95×).

No-Choice Adult Suitability Laboratory Bioassay

Females laid significantly more eggs on ten biotypes, U. changii, U. davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, U. davidiana × U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™, U. pumila (reference), U. szechuanica × U. japonica, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U. pumila, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × U. davidiana, and U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™ compared with other biotypes (F = 56.5; df = 20, 74; P < 0.0001) (Table 2). Significantly fewer eggs or no eggs were laid on six biotypes (U chenmoui, U. davidiana × U. japonica, U. glaucescens, U. japonica, U. propinqua, and U. ‘Morton Glossy’-Triumph™. Ulmus gaussenii, U. lamellosa, U. macrocarpa, U. wilsoniana, and U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × japonica-wilsoniana-pumíla were intermediate in suitability (Table 2).

The mean percentage of females ovipositing differed significantly among biotypes (F = 23.4; df = 20, 74; P < 0.02). The most suitable biotypes had 80% to 100% females ovipositing.

Mean preovipositional period (POP) was significantly different among biotypes (F = 40.8; df = 18, 69; P < 0.003). Females feeding on highly suitable biotypes laid eggs within 5 to 16 d of being introduced to the elm leaves. Female beetles feeding on less suitable elms laid eggs 7 to 20 d (mean = 15 d) or 6 d later into the study. Beetles feeding on the more highly suitable biotypes of U. pumila, and U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™ in this study are consistent with results reported by Miller and Ware (1994, 1997, 1999).

Overall, adult male and females lived approximately 15 and 17 d, respectively. Rankings for both male and female longevity were significant (male, F = 30.3; df = 20, 74; P < 0.05 and female; F = 44.6; df = 20,74; P = 0.001). Males lived longer (>14 d) on U. chenmoui, U. davidiana × U.japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, U. davidiana × U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™, U gaussenii, U. glaucescens, U. macrocarpa, U. propinqua, U. szechuanica × U. japonica, U. wilsoniana, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™, U. ‘Morton Glossy’-Triumph™, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, and U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada Charm™. Similar rankings were observed for female longevity for these same elm biotype, with the exception of U. changii and U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U. pumila, where females lived 20 to 21 d and males lived 1 to 6 d, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Larval development time and proportion of larvae reaching pupation appear to be good predictors of adult emergence. Larvae feeding on less suitable biotypes took longer to develop with a lesser proportion of adults emerging. The reverse is also true.

Preovipositional period is a function, in part, of suitability because adults feeding on the least suitable elms laid eggs later into the study than females feeding on the most suitable biotypes of U. pumila, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U.pumila, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, and U. ‘Red Tip’-Danada Charm™. Adult female longevity reflects suitability for the elm biotypes tested in this study.

Consistent with other reported studies, U. pumila appears to be a major source of both larval and adult host suitability (Young and Hall 1986; Miller and Ware 1994,1997,1999). Simple and complex hybrids containing U. pumila, such as U. davidiana × U. japonica-wilsoniana-pumila, U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™, and U. ‘Morton Plainsman’-Vanguard™ × U. davidiana, U. ‘Morton Red Tip’-Danada™ demonstrated moderate to high larval and adult suitability in this study. Taken alone, U. davidiana, U. japonica, and U. wilsoniana demonstrated low adult suitability (Miller and Ware 1994, 1997, 1999; Hall 1986; Hall and Townsend 1987). In addition, U. japonica also appears to modestly enhance suitability as seen with the simple and complex hybrids of U. szechuanica × U. japonica and U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™ × U. japonica by adult female beetles (Miller and Ware, 1994). Alone, U. szechuancia exhibited extremely low suitability with no eggs being laid by adult female beetles (Miller and Ware 1994). In contrast, U. davidiana appears to somewhat preserve reduced suitability as seen with the simple hybrids of U. davidiana × U. japonica and U. davidiana × U. propinqua. When evaluated alone, U. davidiana, U.japonica, and U. propinqua revealed low adult suitability (Miller and Ware 1994,1997, 1999).

In summary, results from this study indicate that U. chenmoui, U. davidiana, U. davidiana × U. japonica, U. davidiana × U. propinqua, U. elongata, U. glaucescens, U. macrocarpa, U. parvifolia, U. propinqua, U. szechuanica, U. wilsoniana, U. ‘Morton’-Accolade™, and U. ‘Morton Glossy’ - Triumph™ have low suitability for both elm leaf beetle larvae and adults. The results reported here provide valuable information on the effect of Asiatic elm hosts on elm leaf beetle larval development and adult fecundity. Information from this study will be helpful in utilizing these elm biotypes in future elm breeding programs and for potential use in landscapes and urban forests where both acute and chronic elm leaf beetle populations are present.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere thanks to M. Wagner (Northern Arizona University) for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge R. Seymour (University of Nebraska) for supplying elm leaf beetle larvae and pupae. Special thanks are due K. Malmquist, K. Olsen, and M. Miller for their hard work with the laboratory bioassays, colony maintenance, data entry, and manuscript preparation.

  • © 2001, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Hall, R.W
    1986. Preference and suitability of elms for adult elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 15:143-146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Hall, R.W., and
    2. A.M. Townsend
    . 1987. Suitability of Ulmus wilsoniana, the ‘Urban Elm’, and their hybrids for the elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Müller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 16:1042-1044.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hall, R.W.,
    2. A.M. Townsend, and
    3. J.H. Barger
    . 1987. Suitability of thirteen different host species for elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Environ. Hortic. 5:143—145.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hall, R.W, and
    2. C.E. Young
    . 1986. Host suitability of three Asiatic elms to the elm leaf beetle (Xantho-galeruca luteola) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).J. Environ. Hortic. 4:44-46.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Jandel Scientific. 1992. SigmaStat for Windows. San Rafael, CA.
  4. ↵
    1. Frankie, G.W, and
    2. C.S. Koehler
    1. Kielbaso, J.J., and
    2. M.K. Kennedy
    . 1983. Urban forestry and entomology: A current appraisal. In Frankie, G.W, and C.S. Koehler (Eds.). Urban Entomology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Praeger Scientific. New York, NY.
  5. ↵
    1. Luck, R.F., and
    2. G.T. Scriven
    . 1979. The elm leaf beetle, Pyrrhalta luteola, in southern California: Its host preference and host impact. Environ. Entomol. 8:307-313.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Miller, E, and
    2. G. Ware
    . 1994. Preference for and suitability of selected elms, Ulmus spp., and their hybrids for the elm leaf beetle (Pyrrhalta luteola Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Environ. Hortic. 12:231-235.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Miller, E, and
    2. G. Ware
    . 1997. Preference for and suitability of Asian elms species and hybrids for the adult elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ.Entomol. 90(6):l641—1645.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Miller, E, and
    2. G. Ware
    . 1999. Resistance of elms of the Ulmus davidiana complex to defoliation by the adult elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). ĵ.Econ. Entomol. 92(5):1147-1150.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Nielsen, D.G.,
    2. E.R. Hart,
    3. M.E. Dix,
    4. M.J.. Linit,
    5. J.E. Appleby,
    6. M. Acerno,
    7. D.L. Mahr,
    8. D.A. Potter, and
    9. J.A. Jones
    . 1985. Common street trees and their pest problems in the North Central United States. J. Arboric. 11:225—232.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Ware, G
    . 1992. Elm breeding and improvement at The Morton Arboretum. Morton Arboretum Q. 28:846-849.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Ware, G
    . 1995. Little-known elms from China: Landscape tree possibilities. J. Arboric. 21:284—288.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Wu, Z.S.,
    2. S. Jamieson, and
    3. J. Kielbaso
    . 1991. Urban forest pest management. J. Arboric. 17:150—158.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Young, C.E., and
    2. R.W Hall
    . 1986. Factors influencing suitability of elms for elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Müller) (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 15:846—849.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 27 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 27, Issue 3
May 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fredric Miller, George Ware
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 118-125; DOI: 10.48044/joa.2001.27.3.118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Host Suitability of Asiatic Elm Species and Hybrids for Larvae and Adults of the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
Fredric Miller, George Ware
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2001, 27 (3) 118-125; DOI: 10.48044/joa.2001.27.3.118
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Pyrrhalta luteola
  • Elm leaf beetle
  • Ulmus
  • larval development
  • adult suitability

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire