Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Tree Crown Stabilization with the Double-Belt System Osnabrück

Horst Stobbe, Dirk Dujesiefken and Klaus Schröder
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 2000, 26 (5) 270-274; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.2000.26.5.270
Horst Stobbe
1Institute of Wood-Biology, University of Hamburg, Leuschnerstraße 91, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk Dujesiefken
2Institute for Arboriculture, Brookkehre 60, D-21029 Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Schröder
3Fachbereich Grün und Umwelt, P.O. Box 4460, D-49034 Osnabrück, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Breaking-off of crown parts and large branches is a common type of tree failure and can result in substantial damage to objects and persons. The trees are often irreversibly damaged as well. Reasons for this type of failure are usually included bark in forks and decay or cracks in branches. As an alternative to topping or felling hazard trees, a tree crown stabilization system was developed for the protection of crowns endangered by possible failure. The System Osnabrück consists of at least two double belts, each strapped around the stem or branch and connected by wire cables. Wood-biological investigations on beech trees with six-year-old double-belt systems showed that neither discoloration nor fungal attack occurred in the wood and bark under the belts. The cambium beneath the belts apparently was not impaired either. The double-belt system makes it possible to maintain old trees with severe defects in urban areas by safeguarding their natural crown architecture as well as providing maximum safety to the public.

Key Words
  • Included bark
  • branch failure
  • tree care
  • crown stabilization
  • System Osnabrück
  • hazard trees
  • public safety
  • CrownTex®

Breaking-off of crown parts and large branches is a common type of failure with city trees. This failure may cause substantial damage to objects and persons, and subsequently the trees concerned are often damaged irreversibly. The reason for failure is that the force (i.e., weight and wind) on the branch exceeds the strength of the wood, which is strongly influenced by such weaknesses as included bark between stem and branch, split forks, fractures in branches (hazard beams), or rot in branches (Matheny and Clark 1994; Mattheck and Breloer 1994).

The breaking-off of parts of trees can be prevented by various methods. Instead of severely reducing the crown, so-called crown anchorages or cables have been used for many years, whereby the tree’s sections to be protected are connected with steel cables anchored with rods or bolts in the branch or trunk (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

The crown anchor is mechanically well done, but is it really the best solution for the tree?

Investigations of tree sections with rods and bolts from old crown anchorages showed that the perforation leads to injury of the initially healthy wood and results in discoloration and decay within the area of the crown anchorages, which is narrowly compartmentalized on cross-section (Shigo and Felix 1980) but vast in longitudinal direction (Dujesiefken et al. 1989; Dujesiefken and Liese 1990) (Figure 2). This is damage to the tree but normally does not predispose the system to failure.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Some years after installation of a crown anchor: The bolt with a diameter of 18 mm (0.7 in.) led to discoloration and white rot above and below the drill hole.

The general efforts to base tree care methods on biological results include the avoidance of unnecessary injury. Therefore, crown-securing systems that avoid such injury were developed for the protection of crotches that are at a high risk of failure (Sinn 1989; Schröder 1993). These methods were integrated into the German rules and regulations for tree care methods for the first time in 1993 (ZTV-Baumpflege 1993), with the note that long-term experiences and secured results were not available at that time. With the objective to contribute to these experiences, the following wood-biological investigation was made to determine potential subsequent effects on the tree by this type of crown-stabilization system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In December 1991, securing systems using belts were installed on ten beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) with crowns with a high risk of failure because of included bark in compression forks. The trees were in an urban forest near Osnabrück, Germany, and were approximately 60 to 80 years of age. Beech trees have a thin bark even at the age of about 80 years and thus react sensitively to such attachments. The double-belt System Osnabrück was a forerunner of the today’s CrownTex® belts (Figure 3). The clamps to close the belts were not yet padded, and the system was not equipped with an elastic element within the fastening belts to keep them in place and which surround the stem or branch. Instead of the hollow polyester ropes used today, wire cables were used to link these belts to each other.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The double-belt System Osnabrück. It consists of a fastening belt to fix the system at the stem (1) and a superimposed, strong retaining belt that carries the load (2).

In October 1997, ten stems were examined to determine the effects of this system on the trees (Schröder et al. 1998). For wood-biological investigations, five 30-cm-long (12-in.) wood samples were taken from the area where the belts were installed. These samples were split radially and the condition of the wood in the area of the belts was examined.

For light-microscopic observations, 1 cm3 (0.06 in3) wood samples were taken from the area under the belt; Twenty-μm cross sections were prepared and stained with safranine and astra blue to differentiate between distinct cell structures. The results were photographically documented.

RESULTS

Six years after installation, the diameter of the investigated stems increased 1 cm (0.4 in.), resulting from an annual increment of nearly 1 to 2 mm (0.04 to 0.08 in.), which is typical for older trees in urban areas. The wire cables used for the crown protection had sagged slightly and appeared to be in a good condition. In general, the belts were exactly in the place of installation; only one had slipped down after installation. Visually, both holding and fastening belts were in good condition, except for normal algae growth and some slightly abraded parts in the areas around the connection to the wire cables (Figure 4). The clamping locks in the fastening belts could be opened without problem and were entirely functional.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

A double belt at a secured stem six years after installation. Tree and crown protection system are in a good condition.

The bark beneath the belts showed only partially visible deformation—a 1- to 2-mm-thick fold on the bark in the area of the strap and the clamping lock (Figure 5). This fold was restricted exclusively to bark tissue.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

On four stems, a 1- to 2-mm-thick (0.04- to 0.08-in.) fold on the bark was visible (arrow); it was found in the area of the strap and the clamping lock

In the wood, neither discoloration nor fungal attack occurred (Figure 6). The cambium did not seem to have been impaired by the belts concerning wood formation.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

No changes of the wood are visible in the area where belt and tree were in contact.

The microscopic investigation of the woody tissue formed before and after the installation of the double belts did not result in altered cell structures (Figure 7); therefore, the disturbances of the cambium activity due to the attachment of the belt to the stem can be excluded.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

The light-microscopic study shows no changes in wood structure and normal increment. Bark at the top; late wood of the 1996 growth ring at the bottom (40×).

DISCUSSION

According to German rules and regulations for tree care methods (ZTV-Baumpflege 1993) crown-securing systems using belts must be inspected close-up in the crown every second year. On the basis of the findings at hand, an inspection interval of five years appears feasible for the System Osnabrũck, if it is dimensioned and installed correctly This interval corresponds to the inspection interval for conventional crown anchorages. For fast-growing trees (e.g., Populus), the inspection interval of the double-belt system should be reduced to allow the functioning of the system to be maintained.

It can be stated that even after six years, no damage to the trees resulted from the installation of the crown-securing systems. In some cases, marks on the bark were observed in the area of the strap and the clamping lock. Bark deformation can be avoided by installing the CrownTex® belt system, which has a flexible element in the fastening belt and padded clamping lock.

Even if the tree compartmentalizes wounds (Shigo and Felix 1980) from crown anchorages using threaded rods or bolts, discoloration and decay occurs in the wounded tissue, especially in the longitudinal direction (Dujesiefken et al. 1989; Dujesiefken and Liese 1990). These wounds can be avoided using systems consisting of belts strapped around the stems.

A professional installation of crown-securing systems with regular inspections of the straps every two to five years causes no impairments for the tree. Safeguarding methods, such as the double-belt System Osnabrũck and other products in normal commercial usage, such as the Cobra System (Lesnino et al. 2000), can be recommended without reservation based on our observations of ten trees over several years. These systems are harmless to slow-growing trees and are easy to tend.

  • Copyright © 2000, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Dujesiefken, D.,
    2. S. Ebenritter, and
    3. W. Liese
    . 1989. Wundreaktionen im Holzgewebe bei Birke, Buche und Linde [Wound reactions in the xylem of birch, beech and lime]. Holz Roh Werkst. 47:495–500.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Dujesiefken, D., and
    2. W. Liese
    . 1990. Einfluß der Verletzungszeit auf die Wundheilung bei Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) [Time of wounding and wound healing in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)]. Holz Roh Werkst. 48:95–99.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Dujesiefken, D., and
    2. P. Kockerbeck
    1. Lesnino, G.,
    2. E. Brudi, and
    3. C. Spieß
    . 2000. Kronensicherung mit dem Cobra System— Erfolgskontrolle nach fũnf Jahren Einsatzdauer [Crown stabilization with the Cobra System—Control five years after installation], pp 211–218. In Dujesiefken, D., and P. Kockerbeck (Eds.). Jahrbuch der Baumpflege 2000. Thalacker Medien, Braunschweig, Germany
  4. ↵
    1. Matheny, P.,
    2. J.R. Clark
    . 1994. A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas (2nd ed). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, USA. 85 pp.
  5. ↵
    1. Mattheck, C., and
    2. H. Breloer
    . 1994. Research for Amenity Trees No. 4. The Body Language of Trees. HMSO, London, England. 240 pp.
  6. ↵
    1. Schröder, K.
    1993. The double-belt system for tree crown stabilization. Arboric. J. 17:375–384.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Schröder, K.,
    2. H. Stobbe, and
    3. D. Dujesiefken
    . 1998. Kronensicherungen mit Doppelgurten “System Osnabrück”—Holzbiologische Untersuchungen sechs Jahre nach dem Einbau [Tree crown stabilization with the double-belt “System Osnabrück”—Wood-biological investigations six years after installation]. LA Land- schaftsarchitektur 28(8):40–42.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Sinn, G.
    1989. Ein neues Kronensicherungssystem zur Ver-kehrssicherheit von Bäumen [A new crown stabilization system for the safety of trees]. Neue Landschaft 34:592–594.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L., and
    2. R. Felix
    . 1980. Cabling and bracing. J. Arboric. 6:5–9.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    ZTV-Baumpflege. 1993. Zusätzliche Technische Vertragsbedingungen und Richtlinien für Baumpflege und Baumsanierung (2nd ed.) [Technical Regulation Guidelines for Arboriculture]. Forschungsgesellschaft Landschaftsentwicklung, Landschaftsbau e.V (FLL), Bonn, Germany. 56 pp.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 26 (5)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 26, Issue 5
September 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tree Crown Stabilization with the Double-Belt System Osnabrück
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Tree Crown Stabilization with the Double-Belt System Osnabrück
Horst Stobbe, Dirk Dujesiefken, Klaus Schröder
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2000, 26 (5) 270-274; DOI: 10.48044/joa.2000.26.5.270

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tree Crown Stabilization with the Double-Belt System Osnabrück
Horst Stobbe, Dirk Dujesiefken, Klaus Schröder
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2000, 26 (5) 270-274; DOI: 10.48044/joa.2000.26.5.270
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIAL AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Included bark
  • branch failure
  • tree care
  • crown stabilization
  • System Osnabrück
  • hazard trees
  • public safety
  • CrownTex®

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire