Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Pruning Trees: The Problem of Forks

Christophe Drénou
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 2000, 26 (5) 264-269; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2000.032
Christophe Drénou
Institut pour le Développement Forestier, Maison de la forêt, 7 chemin de la Lacade, 31320 Auzeville-Tolosane, France, email
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Beeches (Fagus sylvatica) are especially sensitive to light conditions. In open forest, the trunk is straight (A). In dense forest, the tree takes on a temporary architecture, which characterizes itself by a terminal fork and a small flat crown (B).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Recurrent forks appear each year at the end of the trunk and reabsorb themselves after two or three years. Zelkova serrata (A) and Quercus robur (B). Forks are circled.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The main fork of a tree marks the appearance of the main branches of the crown. It is the result of a progressive straightening of the trunk’s branches and can be expressed later by death of the apex, shown on Populus nigra (A); of terminal flowering, shown on Juglans regia (B); or of a perfect equivalence between the trunk and the main branches, shown on Prunus avium (C).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Accidental fork formed by straightening of two branches on a Pinus pinaster.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    In contrast to tree A, tree B formed a perennial fork of accidental origin while still immature.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 26 (5)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 26, Issue 5
September 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pruning Trees: The Problem of Forks
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Pruning Trees: The Problem of Forks
Christophe Drénou
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2000, 26 (5) 264-269; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2000.032

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pruning Trees: The Problem of Forks
Christophe Drénou
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 2000, 26 (5) 264-269; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2000.032
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • TEMPORARY FORKS
    • RECURRENT FORKS
    • MAIN FORKS
    • ACCIDENTAL FORKS
    • DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN ACCIDENTAL AND MAIN FORKS
    • WHAT SHOULD BE PRUNED?
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • tree architecture
  • formation pruning
  • pruning
  • forks

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire