Growth and Morphology Differ Between Wind-Exposed Families of Sorbus aucuparia (L.)

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Bacilieri, R.,
   2. T. Labbe, and
   3. A. Kremer

   . 1994. Intraspecific genetic structure in a mixed population of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Leibl. and Q. robur L. Heredity 73: 130–141.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Becker, W.A.

   1984. Manuals of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA. 190 pp.
3. ↵
   1. Bruederle, L.P.,
   2. D.F. Tomback,
   3. K.K. Kelly,
   4. R.C. Hardwick

   . 1998. Population genetic structure in a bird- dispersed pine, Pinus albicaulis (Pinaceae). Can. J. Bot. 76:83–90.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Ericsson, T.

   1994. Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) Breeding in Sweden—Results and Prospects Based on Early Evaluation. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå.
5. ↵
   1. Falconer, D.S.

   1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 3rd ed. Longman Scientific and Technical. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 438 pp.
6. ↵
   1. Frascaria, N.,
   2. F. Santi,
   3. P.H. Gouyon

   . 1993. Genetic differentiation within and among populations of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Heredity 70:634–641.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Gianola, D., and
   2. H.W. Norton

   . 1981. Scaling threshold characters. Genetics 99:357–364.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   1. Herzog, S.

   1996. Genetic inventory of European oak populations: Consequences for breeding and gene conservation. Ann. Sci. For. 53:783–793.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Håbjørg, A.

   1978. Photoperiodic ecotypes in Scandinavian trees and shrubs. Scient. Rep. of the Agric. Univ. Norway 57. 20 pp.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Hillebrand, K., and
    2. A. Rosenberg

    . 1996. Hinweise zu höhenzonalem Wachstum und Ökotypen der Vogelbeere. Forst Holz 7:216–220.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Jensen, J.S.

    1993. Variation of growth in Danish provenance trials with oak (Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea Mattuschka Liebl.). Ann. Sci. For. 50:203–207.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Konnert, M.

    1995. Investigations on the genetic variation of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Bavaria. Silvae Genet. 44:346–351.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Kremer, A.,
    2. R.J. Petit

    . 1993. Gene diversity in natural populations of oak species. Ann. Sci. For. 50:186–202.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Lagerström, T., and
    2. G. Eriksson

    . 1996. Improvement of trees and shrubs by phenotypic selection for landscaping in urban and rural areas—A Swedish example. For. Landsc. Res. 1:349–366.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Lambeth, C.C.

    1980. Juvenile-mature correlations in Pinaceae and implications for early selection. For. Sci. 26(4):571–580.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Larsen, A.B.

    1996. Genetic structure of populations of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Denmark. Scand. J. For. Res. 11:220–232.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Löchelt, S., and
    2. A. Franke

    . 1995. Bestimmung der genetischen Konstitution von Buchen-Beständen (Fagus sylvatica L.) entlang eines Höhenstransektes von Freiburg auf den Schauinsland. Silvae Genet. 44:312–318.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Mariette, S.,
    2. M. Lefranc,
    3. P. Legrand,
    4. D. Taneyhill,
    5. N. Frascaria-Lacoste, and
    6. N. Machon

    . 1997. Genetic variability in wild cherry populations in France. Effects of colonizing processes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:904–908.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Nebe, W., and
    2. M. Opfermann

    . 1998. Zur Ernährung der Eberesche (Sorbus aucuparia L.) im Vergleich zur Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Forst Holz 2:48–50.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Popov, A.A.

    1990. Geographical variation in Sorbus aucuparia L. Rastitel’nye-Resursy 26:145–150. [In Russian.]

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Raspe, O., and
    2. A.L. Jacquemart

    . 1998. Allozyme diversity and genetic structure of European populations of Sorbus aucuparia L. (Roseaceae: Maleoideae). Heredity 81:537–545.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Salvesen, P.H.

    1993. Fagerrogn—En særnorsk plante. Naturen 5:198–204.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Samuel, R.,
    2. W. Pinsker, and
    3. F. Ehrendorfer

    . 1995. Electrophoretic analysis of genetic variation within and between populations of Quercus cerris, Q. pubescens, Q. petraea and Q. robur (Fagaceae) from Eastern Austria. Bot. Acta 108:290–299.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
24. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Circle, Cary, NC.
25. ↵
    1. Sperens, U.

    1997. Long-term variation in, and effects of fertiliser addition on, flower, fruit and seed production in the tree Sorbus aucuparia (Roseaceae). Ecography 20:521–534.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Squillace, A.E.

    1974. Average genetic correlation among offspring from open pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet. 23:149–156.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Wang, T., and
    2. P.M.A. Tigerstedt

    . 1993. Variation of growth rhythm among families and correlation between growth rhythm and growth rate in Betula pendula Roth. Scand. J. For. Res. 8:489–497.

    OpenUrl